Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/8] test: introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR variable
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:51:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz3gNBTva9qTTIw0@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2771fb73-973b-3dd6-ef87-881f31dcda96@tarantool.org>

Sergey,

On 02.09.22, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 31.08.2022 17:53, Igor Munkin wrote:
> > Sergey,
> >
> > Thanks for your review!
> >
> > On 15.08.22, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> >> Igor,
> >>
> >>    thanks for the patch. See my comments inline.
> >>
> >> On 11.08.2022 14:17, Igor Munkin wrote:
> >>> Before the patch both memprof and sysprof artefacts are generated within
> >>> the binary artefacts tree (i.e. in the same directory LuaJIT binary is
> >>> generated). However, more convenient way is producing these temporary
> >>> profiles in a separate directory (e.g. located on the partition with
> >>> more strict space limits). As a result of the patch all memprof and
> >>> sysprof test chunks consider LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR environment variable to
> >>> set the directory where test profiles are generated. For the case when
> >>> LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR is not set, everything works as before.
> >> Commit message is inconsistent a bit with a patch itself.
> >>
> >> As far as I understand many hunks are not related to introducing
> >> LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR.
> >>
> >> Probably it is better to change commit one-line message from "test:
> >> introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR variable"
> >>
> >> to something like "test: refactoring and introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR
> >> variable". It allows to keep patch
> >>
> >> as is and change expectations for those who will look at your patch.
> > I believe your commit subject is too long, so I propose another
> > solution. Since the only thing affected by LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR is
> > <utils.profilename>, so I can write something like "test: introduce
> > utils.profilename helper" and describe its rationale and functions
> > within the commit message. Are you OK with it?
> 
> I'm ok!

I've rewritten the commit message the following way:
| test: introduce utils.profilename helper
|
| Before the patch both memprof and sysprof artefacts were generated
| within the binary artefacts tree (i.e. in the same directory LuaJIT
| binary is generated). However, more convenient way is producing these
| temporary profiles in a separate directory (e.g. located on the
| partition with more strict space limits).
|
| As a result of the patch <utils.profilename> helper is introduced and
| all memprof and sysprof test chunks are patched to use it. The new
| helper takes the basename of the profile to be created and also
| considers LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR environment variable to set the directory,
| where test profiles are generated. For the case when LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR
| is not set, everything works as before.
|
| Part of tarantool/tarantool#7472

> 
> <snipped>

-- 
Best regards,
IM

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-11 11:17 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/8] LuaJIT tests and CI enhancements Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/8] test: introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR variable Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:08   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18  8:27     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 14:53     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-09-02 12:06       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-10-05 19:51         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/8] test: introduce MakeLuaPath.cmake helper Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:08   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 15:07     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-09-02 12:09       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18  9:37   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 15:19     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-09-01 10:16       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/8] test: fix tarantool suite for out of source build Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:10   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18  9:49   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 17:20     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/8] ci: use out of source build in GitHub Actions Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:13   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18  9:58     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 15:34       ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 15:33     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-09-02 12:09       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 5/8] ci: remove excess parallel level setup Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:14   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18 10:09   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 6/8] ci: remove arch prefix for macOS M1 workflow Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:17   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18 10:14   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 15:55     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 7/8] ci: merge x86_64 and ARM64 workflows Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:22   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18 10:21   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-31 16:02     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-11 11:17 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 8/8] ci: merge Linux and macOS workflows Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-15 12:27   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2022-08-18 10:32   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-11-11  8:56 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/8] LuaJIT tests and CI enhancements Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yz3gNBTva9qTTIw0@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=imun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/8] test: introduce LUAJIT_TEST_VARDIR variable' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox