Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org, tsafin@tarantool.org
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 20/52] sql: introduce mem_compare()
Date: Fri,  9 Apr 2021 20:57:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a71515faac5f305fc3bd1ebbc20d1dd65bf027c.1617984948.git.imeevma@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1617984948.git.imeevma@gmail.com>

Thank you for the review! My answers and new patch below.

On 30.03.2021 02:03, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> I don't understand. Why are there still sqlMemCompare(), sqlBlobCompare()
> if you also have mem_compare(), compare_blobs(), compare_numbers()?
>
Functions compare_blobs(), compare_numbers() and compare_strings() are used to
simplify mem_compare(). Also, now I use them in sqlMemCompare(). Function
mem_compare() is used to perform comparison of two values in opcodes OP_Ge,
OP_Le, etc. Function sqlMemCompare() is used for comparison in other parts.
There two functions Have a bit different way to compare MEMs, which is whong, I
believe. Still, removing each of them will change behaviour, so I decided to
left them both be for now. Function sqlBlobCompare() is the same as function
compare_blobs() (actually it is vice versa), so I removed this function.

>> diff --git a/src/box/sql/mem.c b/src/box/sql/mem.c
>> index 6120939d8..8119644ed 100644
>> --- a/src/box/sql/mem.c
>> +++ b/src/box/sql/mem.c
>> @@ -556,6 +556,247 @@ mem_arithmetic(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int
>> +compare_blobs(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, int *result)> +{
>> +	int nl = left->n;
>> +	int nr = right->n;
>> +	int minlen = MIN(nl, nr);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * It is possible to have a Blob value that has some non-zero content
>> +	 * followed by zero content.  But that only comes up for Blobs formed
>> +	 * by the OP_MakeRecord opcode, and such Blobs never get passed into
>> +	 * mem_compare().
>> +	 */
>> +	assert((left->flags & MEM_Zero) == 0 || nl == 0);
>> +	assert((right->flags & MEM_Zero) == 0 || nr == 0);
>> +
>> +	if (left->flags & right->flags & MEM_Zero) {
>
> Please, use explicit != 0, in the other places below too.
Fixed.


New patch:

commit 5a71515faac5f305fc3bd1ebbc20d1dd65bf027c
Author: Mergen Imeev <imeevma@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Mar 14 13:13:34 2021 +0300

    sql: introduce mem_compare()
    
    This patch introduces mem_compare(). Function mem_compare() compares the
    first and the second MEMs and returns result of comparison.
    
    Part of #5818

diff --git a/src/box/sql/mem.c b/src/box/sql/mem.c
index 859e337aa..eee72a7fe 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/mem.c
+++ b/src/box/sql/mem.c
@@ -624,6 +624,211 @@ mem_rem(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, struct Mem *result)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int
+compare_blobs(const struct Mem *a, const struct Mem *b, int *result)
+{
+	int an = a->n;
+	int bn = b->n;
+	int minlen = MIN(an, bn);
+
+	/*
+	 * It is possible to have a Blob value that has some non-zero content
+	 * followed by zero content.  But that only comes up for Blobs formed
+	 * by the OP_MakeRecord opcode, and such Blobs never get passed into
+	 * mem_compare().
+	 */
+	assert((a->flags & MEM_Zero) == 0 || an == 0);
+	assert((b->flags & MEM_Zero) == 0 || bn == 0);
+
+	if ((a->flags & b->flags & MEM_Zero) != 0) {
+		*result = a->u.nZero - b->u.nZero;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if ((a->flags & MEM_Zero) != 0) {
+		for (int i = 0; i < minlen; ++i) {
+			if (b->z[i] != 0) {
+				*result = -1;
+				return 0;
+			}
+		}
+		*result = a->u.nZero - bn;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if ((b->flags & MEM_Zero) != 0) {
+		for (int i = 0; i < minlen; ++i) {
+			if (a->z[i] != 0){
+				*result = 1;
+				return 0;
+			}
+		}
+		*result = b->u.nZero - an;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	*result = memcmp(a->z, b->z, minlen);
+	if (*result != 0)
+		return 0;
+	*result = an - bn;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+compare_numbers(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, int *result)
+{
+	struct sql_num a, b;
+	/* TODO: Here should be check for right value type. */
+	if (get_number(right, &b) != 0) {
+		*result = -1;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if (get_number(left, &a) != 0) {
+		diag_set(ClientError, ER_SQL_TYPE_MISMATCH, mem_str(left),
+			 "numeric");
+		return -1;
+	}
+	if (a.type == MEM_Real) {
+		if (b.type == MEM_Real) {
+			if (a.d > b.d)
+				*result = 1;
+			else if (a.d < b.d)
+				*result = -1;
+			else
+				*result = 0;
+			return 0;
+		}
+		if (b.type == MEM_Int)
+			*result = double_compare_nint64(a.d, b.i, 1);
+		else
+			*result = double_compare_uint64(a.d, b.u, 1);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if (a.type == MEM_Int) {
+		if (b.type == MEM_Int) {
+			if (a.i > b.i)
+				*result = 1;
+			else if (a.i < b.i)
+				*result = -1;
+			else
+				*result = 0;
+			return 0;
+		}
+		if (b.type == MEM_UInt)
+			*result = -1;
+		else
+			*result = double_compare_nint64(b.d, a.i, -1);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	assert(a.type == MEM_UInt);
+	if (b.type == MEM_UInt) {
+		if (a.u > b.u)
+			*result = 1;
+		else if (a.u < b.u)
+			*result = -1;
+		else
+			*result = 0;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if (b.type == MEM_Int)
+		*result = 1;
+	else
+		*result = double_compare_uint64(b.d, a.u, -1);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+compare_strings(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, int *result,
+		const struct coll *coll)
+{
+	char *a;
+	uint32_t an;
+	char bufl[BUF_SIZE];
+	if ((left->flags & MEM_Str) != 0) {
+		a = left->z;
+		an = left->n;
+	} else {
+		assert((left->flags & (MEM_Int | MEM_UInt | MEM_Real)) != 0);
+		a = &bufl[0];
+		if ((left->flags & MEM_Int) != 0)
+			sql_snprintf(BUF_SIZE, a, "%lld", left->u.i);
+		else if ((left->flags & MEM_UInt) != 0)
+			sql_snprintf(BUF_SIZE, a, "%llu", left->u.u);
+		else
+			sql_snprintf(BUF_SIZE, a, "%!.15g", left->u.r);
+		an = strlen(a);
+	}
+
+	char *b;
+	uint32_t bn;
+	char bufr[BUF_SIZE];
+	if ((right->flags & MEM_Str) != 0) {
+		b = right->z;
+		bn = right->n;
+	} else {
+		assert((right->flags & (MEM_Int | MEM_UInt | MEM_Real)) != 0);
+		b = &bufr[0];
+		if ((right->flags & MEM_Int) != 0)
+			sql_snprintf(BUF_SIZE, b, "%lld", right->u.i);
+		else if ((right->flags & MEM_UInt) != 0)
+			sql_snprintf(BUF_SIZE, b, "%llu", right->u.u);
+		else
+			sql_snprintf(BUF_SIZE, b, "%!.15g", right->u.r);
+		bn = strlen(b);
+	}
+	if (coll) {
+		*result = coll->cmp(a, an, b, bn, coll);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	uint32_t minlen = MIN(an, bn);
+	*result = memcmp(a, b, minlen);
+	if (*result != 0)
+		return 0;
+	*result = an - bn;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int
+mem_compare(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, int *result,
+	    enum field_type type, struct coll *coll)
+{
+	assert(((left->flags | right->flags) & MEM_Null) == 0);
+	int flags_any = left->flags | right->flags;
+	int flags_all = left->flags & right->flags;
+
+	if ((flags_all & MEM_Bool) != 0) {
+		if (left->u.b == right->u.b)
+			*result = 0;
+		else if (left->u.b)
+			*result = 1;
+		else
+			*result = -1;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if ((flags_any & MEM_Bool) != 0) {
+		char *str = (left->flags & MEM_Bool) == 0 ?
+			    mem_type_to_str(left) : mem_type_to_str(right);
+		diag_set(ClientError, ER_SQL_TYPE_MISMATCH, str, "boolean");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if ((flags_all & MEM_Blob) != 0)
+		return compare_blobs(left, right, result);
+	if ((flags_any & MEM_Blob) != 0) {
+		char *str = (left->flags & MEM_Blob) == 0 ?
+			    mem_type_to_str(left) : mem_type_to_str(right);
+		diag_set(ClientError, ER_SQL_TYPE_MISMATCH, str, "varbinary");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (type == FIELD_TYPE_STRING)
+		return compare_strings(left, right, result, coll);
+
+	if (sql_type_is_numeric(type) ||
+	    (flags_any & (MEM_Int | MEM_UInt | MEM_Real)) != 0)
+		return compare_numbers(left, right, result);
+
+	assert((left->flags & MEM_Str) != 0 && (right->flags & MEM_Str) != 0);
+	return compare_strings(left, right, result, coll);
+}
+
 static inline bool
 mem_has_msgpack_subtype(struct Mem *mem)
 {
@@ -2071,45 +2276,6 @@ sqlVdbeMemTooBig(Mem * p)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Compare two blobs.  Return negative, zero, or positive if the first
- * is less than, equal to, or greater than the second, respectively.
- * If one blob is a prefix of the other, then the shorter is the lessor.
- */
-static SQL_NOINLINE int
-sqlBlobCompare(const Mem * pB1, const Mem * pB2)
-{
-	int c;
-	int n1 = pB1->n;
-	int n2 = pB2->n;
-
-	/* It is possible to have a Blob value that has some non-zero content
-	 * followed by zero content.  But that only comes up for Blobs formed
-	 * by the OP_MakeRecord opcode, and such Blobs never get passed into
-	 * sqlMemCompare().
-	 */
-	assert((pB1->flags & MEM_Zero) == 0 || n1 == 0);
-	assert((pB2->flags & MEM_Zero) == 0 || n2 == 0);
-
-	if ((pB1->flags | pB2->flags) & MEM_Zero) {
-		if (pB1->flags & pB2->flags & MEM_Zero) {
-			return pB1->u.nZero - pB2->u.nZero;
-		} else if (pB1->flags & MEM_Zero) {
-			if (!isAllZero(pB2->z, pB2->n))
-				return -1;
-			return pB1->u.nZero - n2;
-		} else {
-			if (!isAllZero(pB1->z, pB1->n))
-				return +1;
-			return n1 - pB2->u.nZero;
-		}
-	}
-	c = memcmp(pB1->z, pB2->z, n1 > n2 ? n2 : n1);
-	if (c)
-		return c;
-	return n1 - n2;
-}
-
 /*
  * Compare the values contained by the two memory cells, returning
  * negative, zero or positive if pMem1 is less than, equal to, or greater
@@ -2123,6 +2289,7 @@ int
 sqlMemCompare(const Mem * pMem1, const Mem * pMem2, const struct coll * pColl)
 {
 	int f1, f2;
+	int res;
 	int combined_flags;
 
 	f1 = pMem1->flags;
@@ -2152,57 +2319,12 @@ sqlMemCompare(const Mem * pMem1, const Mem * pMem2, const struct coll * pColl)
 	/* At least one of the two values is a number
 	 */
 	if ((combined_flags & (MEM_Int | MEM_UInt | MEM_Real)) != 0) {
-		if ((f1 & f2 & MEM_Int) != 0) {
-			if (pMem1->u.i < pMem2->u.i)
-				return -1;
-			if (pMem1->u.i > pMem2->u.i)
-				return +1;
-			return 0;
-		}
-		if ((f1 & f2 & MEM_UInt) != 0) {
-			if (pMem1->u.u < pMem2->u.u)
-				return -1;
-			if (pMem1->u.u > pMem2->u.u)
-				return +1;
-			return 0;
-		}
-		if ((f1 & f2 & MEM_Real) != 0) {
-			if (pMem1->u.r < pMem2->u.r)
-				return -1;
-			if (pMem1->u.r > pMem2->u.r)
-				return +1;
-			return 0;
-		}
-		if ((f1 & MEM_Int) != 0) {
-			if ((f2 & MEM_Real) != 0) {
-				return double_compare_nint64(pMem2->u.r,
-							     pMem1->u.i, -1);
-			} else {
-				return -1;
-			}
-		}
-		if ((f1 & MEM_UInt) != 0) {
-			if ((f2 & MEM_Real) != 0) {
-				return double_compare_uint64(pMem2->u.r,
-							     pMem1->u.u, -1);
-			} else if ((f2 & MEM_Int) != 0) {
-				return +1;
-			} else {
-				return -1;
-			}
-		}
-		if ((f1 & MEM_Real) != 0) {
-			if ((f2 & MEM_Int) != 0) {
-				return double_compare_nint64(pMem1->u.r,
-							     pMem2->u.i, 1);
-			} else if ((f2 & MEM_UInt) != 0) {
-				return double_compare_uint64(pMem1->u.r,
-							     pMem2->u.u, 1);
-			} else {
-				return -1;
-			}
-		}
-		return +1;
+		if ((f1 & (MEM_Real | MEM_Int | MEM_UInt)) == 0)
+			return +1;
+		if ((f2 & (MEM_Real | MEM_Int | MEM_UInt)) == 0)
+			return -1;
+		compare_numbers(pMem1, pMem2, &res);
+		return res;
 	}
 
 	/* If one value is a string and the other is a blob, the string is less.
@@ -2215,27 +2337,13 @@ sqlMemCompare(const Mem * pMem1, const Mem * pMem2, const struct coll * pColl)
 		if ((f2 & MEM_Str) == 0) {
 			return -1;
 		}
-		/* The collation sequence must be defined at this point, even if
-		 * the user deletes the collation sequence after the vdbe program is
-		 * compiled (this was not always the case).
-		 */
-		if (pColl) {
-			return vdbeCompareMemString(pMem1, pMem2, pColl);
-		} else {
-			size_t n = pMem1->n < pMem2->n ? pMem1->n : pMem2->n;
-			int res;
-			res = memcmp(pMem1->z, pMem2->z, n);
-			if (res == 0)
-				res = (int)pMem1->n - (int)pMem2->n;
-			return res;
-		}
-		/* If a NULL pointer was passed as the collate function, fall through
-		 * to the blob case and use memcmp().
-		 */
+		compare_strings(pMem1, pMem2, &res, pColl);
+		return res;
 	}
 
 	/* Both values must be blobs.  Compare using memcmp().  */
-	return sqlBlobCompare(pMem1, pMem2);
+	compare_blobs(pMem1, pMem2, &res);
+	return res;
 }
 
 bool
diff --git a/src/box/sql/mem.h b/src/box/sql/mem.h
index 69a7d9f7a..6c022d8d8 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/mem.h
+++ b/src/box/sql/mem.h
@@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ mem_div(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, struct Mem *result);
 int
 mem_rem(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, struct Mem *result);
 
+/** Compare two non-NULL MEMs and return the result of comparison. */
+int
+mem_compare(const struct Mem *left, const struct Mem *right, int *result,
+	    enum field_type type, struct coll *coll);
+
 /* One or more of the following flags are set to indicate the validOK
  * representations of the value stored in the Mem struct.
  *
diff --git a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
index 67e1cc85a..6a923a8b6 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
+++ b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
@@ -1607,15 +1607,9 @@ case OP_Le:               /* same as TK_LE, jump, in1, in3 */
 case OP_Gt:               /* same as TK_GT, jump, in1, in3 */
 case OP_Ge: {             /* same as TK_GE, jump, in1, in3 */
 	int res, res2;      /* Result of the comparison of pIn1 against pIn3 */
-	u32 flags1;         /* Copy of initial value of pIn1->flags */
-	u32 flags3;         /* Copy of initial value of pIn3->flags */
 
 	pIn1 = &aMem[pOp->p1];
 	pIn3 = &aMem[pOp->p3];
-	flags1 = pIn1->flags;
-	flags3 = pIn3->flags;
-	enum field_type ft_p1 = pIn1->field_type;
-	enum field_type ft_p3 = pIn3->field_type;
 	if (mem_is_any_null(pIn1, pIn3)) {
 		/* One or both operands are NULL */
 		if (pOp->p5 & SQL_NULLEQ) {
@@ -1649,82 +1643,11 @@ case OP_Ge: {             /* same as TK_GE, jump, in1, in3 */
 			}
 			break;
 		}
-	} else if (mem_is_bool(pIn1) || mem_is_bool(pIn3) ||
-		   mem_is_bin(pIn1) || mem_is_bin(pIn3)) {
-		if (!mem_is_same_type(pIn1, pIn3)) {
-			char *inconsistent_type = mem_is_bool(pIn1) ||
-						  mem_is_bin(pIn1) ?
-						  mem_type_to_str(pIn3) :
-						  mem_type_to_str(pIn1);
-			char *expected_type = mem_is_bool(pIn1) ||
-					      mem_is_bin(pIn1) ?
-					      mem_type_to_str(pIn1) :
-					      mem_type_to_str(pIn3);
-			diag_set(ClientError, ER_SQL_TYPE_MISMATCH,
-				 inconsistent_type, expected_type);
-			goto abort_due_to_error;
-		}
-		res = sqlMemCompare(pIn3, pIn1, NULL);
 	} else {
 		enum field_type type = pOp->p5 & FIELD_TYPE_MASK;
-		if (sql_type_is_numeric(type)) {
-			if (mem_is_str(pIn1)) {
-				mem_apply_numeric_type(pIn1);
-				flags3 = pIn3->flags;
-			}
-			if (mem_is_str(pIn3)) {
-				if (mem_apply_numeric_type(pIn3) != 0) {
-					diag_set(ClientError,
-						 ER_SQL_TYPE_MISMATCH,
-						 mem_str(pIn3),
-						 "numeric");
-					goto abort_due_to_error;
-				}
-			}
-			/* Handle the common case of integer comparison here, as an
-			 * optimization, to avoid a call to sqlMemCompare()
-			 */
-			if (mem_is_int(pIn1) && mem_is_int(pIn3)) {
-				if (!mem_is_uint(pIn1) && !mem_is_uint(pIn3)) {
-					if (pIn3->u.i > pIn1->u.i)
-						res = +1;
-					else if (pIn3->u.i < pIn1->u.i)
-						res = -1;
-					else
-						res = 0;
-					goto compare_op;
-				}
-				if (mem_is_uint(pIn1) && mem_is_uint(pIn3)) {
-					if (pIn3->u.u > pIn1->u.u)
-						res = +1;
-					else if (pIn3->u.u < pIn1->u.u)
-						res = -1;
-					else
-						res = 0;
-					goto compare_op;
-				}
-				if (mem_is_uint(pIn1) && !mem_is_uint(pIn3)) {
-					res = -1;
-					goto compare_op;
-				}
-				res = 1;
-				goto compare_op;
-			}
-		} else if (type == FIELD_TYPE_STRING) {
-			if (!mem_is_str(pIn1) && mem_is_num(pIn1)) {
-				sqlVdbeMemStringify(pIn1);
-				flags1 = (pIn1->flags & ~MEM_TypeMask) | (flags1 & MEM_TypeMask);
-				assert(pIn1!=pIn3);
-			}
-			if (!mem_is_str(pIn3) && mem_is_num(pIn3)) {
-				sqlVdbeMemStringify(pIn3);
-				flags3 = (pIn3->flags & ~MEM_TypeMask) | (flags3 & MEM_TypeMask);
-			}
-		}
-		assert(pOp->p4type==P4_COLLSEQ || pOp->p4.pColl==0);
-		res = sqlMemCompare(pIn3, pIn1, pOp->p4.pColl);
+		if (mem_compare(pIn3, pIn1, &res, type, pOp->p4.pColl))
+			goto abort_due_to_error;
 	}
-			compare_op:
 	switch( pOp->opcode) {
 	case OP_Eq:    res2 = res==0;     break;
 	case OP_Ne:    res2 = res;        break;
@@ -1734,14 +1657,6 @@ case OP_Ge: {             /* same as TK_GE, jump, in1, in3 */
 	default:       res2 = res>=0;     break;
 	}
 
-	/* Undo any changes made by mem_apply_type() to the input registers. */
-	assert((pIn1->flags & MEM_Dyn) == (flags1 & MEM_Dyn));
-	pIn1->flags = flags1;
-	pIn1->field_type = ft_p1;
-	assert((pIn3->flags & MEM_Dyn) == (flags3 & MEM_Dyn));
-	pIn3->flags = flags3;
-	pIn3->field_type = ft_p3;
-
 	if (pOp->p5 & SQL_STOREP2) {
 		iCompare = res;
 		res2 = res2!=0;  /* For this path res2 must be exactly 0 or 1 */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09 16:51 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 00/52] Move mem-related functions to mem.c/mem.h Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:51 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 01/52] sql: enhance vdbe_decode_msgpack_into_mem() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 17:42   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 12:01     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 12:12       ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 23:22       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 23:34         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:51 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 02/52] sql: disable unused code in sql/analyze.c Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:51 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 03/52] sql: disable unused code in sql/legacy.c Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:51 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 04/52] sql: remove NULL-termination in OP_ResultRow Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 22:23   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 22:37     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:51 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 05/52] sql: move MEM-related functions to mem.c/mem.h Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:59 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 06/52] sql: refactor port_vdbemem_*() functions Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:59 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 07/52] sql: remove unused MEM-related functions Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:59 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 08/52] sql: disable unused code in sql/vdbemem.c Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:59 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 09/52] sql: introduce mem_str() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 17:44   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 12:36     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 22:23       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 22:42         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 16:59 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 10/52] sql: introduce mem_create() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:36 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 11/52] sql: introduce mem_destroy() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 17:46   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 12:42     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:36 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 12/52] sql: introduce mem_is_*() functions() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 17:59   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 16:09     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 22:48       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:07         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:36 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 13/52] sql: introduce mem_copy() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 18:06   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 16:18     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:36 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 14/52] sql: introduce mem_copy_as_ephemeral() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 18:10   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 16:31     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 15/52] sql: rework mem_move() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 18:10   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 16:38     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 16/52] sql: rework vdbe_decode_msgpack_into_mem() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 17/52] sql: remove sql_column_to_messagepack() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 22:58   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:14     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 18/52] sql: introduce mem_concat() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 18:11   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 16:57     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:04       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:22         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 19/52] sql: introduce arithmetic operations for MEM Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-11 18:13   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 17:06     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:10       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:33         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 17:57 ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-04-11 18:16   ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 20/52] sql: introduce mem_compare() Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 18:33     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:20       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:40         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 21/52] sql: introduce bitwise operations for MEM Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:31   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 20:49     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 22/52] sql: Initialize MEM in sqlVdbeAllocUnpackedRecord() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 23/52] sql: introduce mem_set_null() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 24/52] sql: introduce mem_set_int() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:32   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 20:56     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 18:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 25/52] sql: introduce mem_set_uint() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 19:45 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 26/52] sql: move mem_set_bool() and mem_set_double() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 19:45 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 27/52] sql: introduce mem_set_str_*() functions Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:34   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 21:36     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:49       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-15  1:25         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 19:45 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 28/52] sql: introduce mem_copy_str() and mem_copy_str0() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:35   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 22:00     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 23:54       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-15  0:30         ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 19:45 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 29/52] sql: introduce mem_set_bin_*() functions Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 19:45 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 30/52] sql: introduce mem_copy_bin() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:36   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 22:06     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 31/52] sql: introduce mem_set_zerobin() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 32/52] sql: introduce mem_set_*() for map and array Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:36   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 22:08     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 33/52] sql: introduce mem_set_invalid() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 34/52] sql: refactor mem_set_ptr() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 35/52] sql: introduce mem_set_frame() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:37   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 22:19     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 36/52] sql: introduce mem_set_agg() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:37   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 22:46     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 37/52] sql: introduce mem_set_null_clear() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:38   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 22:50     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 38/52] sql: move MEM flags to mem.c Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 20:42   ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 39/52] sql: introduce mem_to_int*() functions Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 23:39   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 22:58     ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 23:10       ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 20:26 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 40/52] sql: introduce mem_to_double() Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 23:21   ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-15  0:39 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 00/52] Move mem-related functions to mem.c/mem.h Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-15  6:49 ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a71515faac5f305fc3bd1ebbc20d1dd65bf027c.1617984948.git.imeevma@gmail.com \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=imeevma@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tsafin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 20/52] sql: introduce mem_compare()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox