Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Ostanevich <sergos@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:37:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLosjw8cGrZlIkOv@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7D81109B-6734-42E4-914D-2567D1438BE4@tarantool.org>

Hi!

Thanks for the review!

On 02.06.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Thanks for the patch!
> Just one fixup is needed.
> 
> Sergos
> 
> > On 24 May 2021, at 16:27, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Memprof's tests fail for architectures different from x86 and x64,
> > because memprof is not yet implemented for them.
> > 
> > This patch adds skip condition to corresponding test.
> > ---
> > test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> > index b4d66509..4df9cfd8 100644
> > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> > +-- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures.
>                              ^^^^ ——>                          ^
> > +require("utils").skipcond(
> > +  jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64",
> 
> I believe you overcomplicated the condition so it’ll skip even for
> mentioned archs
> 
> tarantool> x='x86'
> ---
> ...
> 
> tarantool> x~='x86' or x~='x64'
> ---
> - true
> ...
> 

Thanks, nice catch!

Fixed.
Branch is force-pushed.

===================================================================
diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
index 4df9cfd8..96beb680 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
--- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures.
+-- Memprof is implemented for only x86 and x64 architectures.
 require("utils").skipcond(
-  jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64",
+  jit.arch ~= "x86" and jit.arch ~= "x64",
   jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof"
 )
 
@@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ local free = fill_ev_type(events, symbols, "free")
 -- the number of allocations.
 -- 1 event - alocation of table by itself + 1 allocation
 -- of array part as far it is bigger than LJ_MAX_COLOSIZE (16).
-test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 21, 19, 2))
+test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 27, 25, 2))
 -- 100 strings allocations.
-test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 26, 19, 100))
+test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 32, 25, 100))
 
 -- Collect all previous allocated objects.
 test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102)
@@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102)
 -- Tests for leak-only option.
 -- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5812.
 local heap_delta = process.form_heap_delta(events, symbols)
-local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(21)]
-local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(26)]
+local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(27)]
+local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(32)]
 test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.nalloc == tab_alloc_stats.nfree)
 test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.dbytes == 0)
 test:ok(str_alloc_stats.nalloc == str_alloc_stats.nfree)
===================================================================

> 
> 
> > +  jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof"
> > +)
> > +
> > local tap = require("tap")
> > 
> > local test = tap.test("misc-memprof-lapi")
> > -- 
> > 2.31.0
> > 
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-04 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-24 13:27 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Fix LuaJIT tests on aarch64, odroid Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/4] ARM, ARM64, PPC: Fix TSETR fallback Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-02 12:04   ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 13:12     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 15:33       ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 15:39         ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-10 13:51   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-11  8:47     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-12 13:09       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-02 12:28   ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 13:37     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-06-04 15:36       ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 16:18         ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-10 13:51   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-11  8:18     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/4] ARM64: Fix xpcall() error case Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-02 12:47   ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 13:45     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-10 13:51   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/4] ARM64: Fix xpcall() error case (really) Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-02 14:43   ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 13:56     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-10 13:52   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-11  8:08     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-01 11:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Fix LuaJIT tests on aarch64, odroid Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-12 16:02 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLosjw8cGrZlIkOv@root \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergos@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox