Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>,
	Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] qsync: provide box.info.synchro interface for monitoring
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:23:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YG8D7wFLhWSa9rmz@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <226c4c61-7174-1789-ffc6-64fdb1bbc642@tarantool.org>

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:17:23PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> 
> 
> 08.04.2021 16:13, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:58:38PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> > > 08.04.2021 15:18, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет:
> > > > In commit 14fa5fd82 (cfg: support symbolic evaluation of
> > > > replication_synchro_quorum) we implemented support of
> > > > symbolic evaluation of `replication_synchro_quorum` parameter
> > > > and there is no easy way to obtain it current run-time value,
> > > > ie evaluated number value.
> > > > 
> > > > Moreover we would like to fetch queue length on transaction
> > > > limbo for tests and extend this statistics in future. Thus
> > > > lets add them.
> > > > 
> > > > Closes #5191
> > > Thanks for the fixes!
> > > 
> > > Please return `box.info.synchro.quorum` assertions to the
> > > test regarding quorum evaluation. Like you had it in the
> > > previous patch version.
> > > 
> > Say like this?
> 
> Yes, but better do it in the test `replication/gh-5446-qsync-eval-quorum`

OK, will move it there and post the final diff

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08 12:18 Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-08 12:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-08 12:58 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-08 13:13   ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-08 13:15     ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-08 13:17     ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-08 13:23       ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-04-08 14:57       ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5] " Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-08 15:24         ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-09 22:24         ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12  5:59 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] " Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YG8D7wFLhWSa9rmz@grain \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] qsync: provide box.info.synchro interface for monitoring' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox