Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 0/1] applier: filter incoming synchro packets via transaction initiator
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 00:58:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <657ec5d8-63e1-25e2-171e-f2ef862ad844@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YM0bUaO3pMSLVDdp@grain>

>>> +box.cfg{replication = {require('fio').cwd() .. "/replica1.sock"}}
>> 2. You don't need require('fio').cwd(). "unix/:./replica1.sock" works
>> just fine. The same for the other socket paths.
> Actually I too this from other examples since I suspect the use of
> absolute path might be critical for test run engine. It is not a problem
> to rename but other our tests do use this trick so meaybe we should stick
> with same approach? Again, I don't mind to use relative path if this
> won't cause problems in future.

Cargo cult does not work. If something is done somewhere, it does not
mean it is correct. I see no issues with using the relative path.
Anyway if it won't work someday, your way won't either, because
cwd() is the same as "./".

>>> +-- Make the master to be RAFT leader, this drops connection
>>> +-- to the replica2.
>> 3. There was no connection to replica2 from master.
> I'll update the comment, thanks! (actually replica2
> connected to the master initialy and this is full
> duplex connection which we close on reconfig, that's
> what I meant saying "dropping" connection, but this
> seems to be confusing).

In the comment you said that this reconfig
drops the connection. But it still does not, even in
the updated definition above.

You dropped this connection a few lines before this

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-15 13:56 Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 13:56 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 1/1] " Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 14:26   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 17:02     ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 18:08       ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-16  8:31         ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-16  8:43           ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-16  8:16       ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-18 21:49 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 0/1] " Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-18 22:16   ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-18 22:58     ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-06-19 11:01       ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-20 14:50         ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-20 17:17           ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-21 21:06 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=657ec5d8-63e1-25e2-171e-f2ef862ad844@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 0/1] applier: filter incoming synchro packets via transaction initiator' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox