Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] relay: yield explicitly every N sent rows
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:08:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538dd07a-ca66-9513-4f5d-1abf2a05ad7a@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCZojN87ply5GGfQ@grain>



12.02.2021 14:37, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:25:41PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
>> @@ -836,11 +836,20 @@ relay_send(struct relay *relay, struct xrow_header *packet)
>>   {
>>   	ERROR_INJECT_YIELD(ERRINJ_RELAY_SEND_DELAY);
>>   
>> +	static uint64_t row_cnt = 0;
>>   	packet->sync = relay->sync;
>>   	relay->last_row_time = ev_monotonic_now(loop());
>>   	coio_write_xrow(&relay->io, packet);
>>   	fiber_gc();
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * It may happen that the socket is always ready for write, so yield
>> +	 * explicitly every now and then to not block the event loop.
>> +	 */
>> +	row_cnt++;
>> +	if (row_cnt % WAL_ROWS_PER_YIELD == 0) {
>> +		fiber_sleep(0);
>> +	}
> Serge, if I'm not missing something obvious, this row counter is
> related to xstream->rows? So maybe define this type as size_t instead,

Thanks for the review!
Yes, it serves the same purpose.
No problem, let it be size_t, updated.

> to be consistent with another occurence of WAL_ROWS_PER_YIELD. Say,
>
> 	static size_t row_cnt = 0;
> 	...
> 	if (++row_cnt % WAL_ROWS_PER_YIELD == 0)
> 		fiber_sleep(0);
>
> I'm fine with uint64_t as well, just out of curiosity.

Looks fine. My bad, I didn't pay enough attention when writing the patch.
=========================================================================
diff --git a/src/box/relay.cc b/src/box/relay.cc
index afc57dfbc..1d8edf116 100644
--- a/src/box/relay.cc
+++ b/src/box/relay.cc
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ relay_send(struct relay *relay, struct xrow_header 
*packet)
  {
      ERROR_INJECT_YIELD(ERRINJ_RELAY_SEND_DELAY);

-    static uint64_t row_cnt = 0;
+    static size_t row_cnt = 0;
      packet->sync = relay->sync;
      relay->last_row_time = ev_monotonic_now(loop());
      coio_write_xrow(&relay->io, packet);
@@ -846,10 +846,9 @@ relay_send(struct relay *relay, struct xrow_header 
*packet)
       * It may happen that the socket is always ready for write, so yield
       * explicitly every now and then to not block the event loop.
       */
-    row_cnt++;
-    if (row_cnt % WAL_ROWS_PER_YIELD == 0) {
+    if (++row_cnt % WAL_ROWS_PER_YIELD == 0)
          fiber_sleep(0);
-    }
+
      struct errinj *inj = errinj(ERRINJ_RELAY_TIMEOUT, ERRINJ_DOUBLE);
      if (inj != NULL && inj->dparam > 0)
          fiber_sleep(inj->dparam);

-- 
Serge Petrenko


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-12 11:25 Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-12 11:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-12 11:46   ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-12 12:08   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-02-12 17:00     ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-12 21:48 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-12 22:25   ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-15  8:45     ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-15  8:40   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-17 21:11     ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-18 20:24       ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-23 22:30         ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-24  9:48           ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-24 10:15             ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-24 10:35               ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-24 12:07                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-24 12:14                   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-24 22:20 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-26  8:41 ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-26 20:24   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-01 11:25     ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-01 21:24       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-02  9:52       ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538dd07a-ca66-9513-4f5d-1abf2a05ad7a@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] relay: yield explicitly every N sent rows' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox