From: Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>,
tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 1/2] router: drop wait_connected from master discovery
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:49:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26e0daed-6f28-c5de-eb8c-8c6a70f09560@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6625ad2-13fb-aaae-9488-2390eb94fe94@tarantool.org>
Thanks for explanation. LGTM.
On 07.12.2021 02:34, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> Hi! Thanks for the review!
>
> On 05.12.2021 18:44, Oleg Babin wrote:
>> Thanks for your patch. Looks reasonable.
>>
>> However I have one question. Before this patch if some
>>
>> connection was down we perform wait_connected and in some
>>
>> cases it could lead to successful reconnection. Currently we just skip
>>
>> broken connections and don't try to reconnect.
>>
>> Could it be a problem or we perform reconnection in another place?
>>
>> What will be happen if all connections will be down?
> All connections use reconnect_after option in netbox. Thus netbox
> handles reconnect. If all are down, netbox_wait_connected won't help
> either. So you will need to make several master discovery iterations
> anyway until one is found.
>
> Also before this patch netbox_wait_connected() couldn't boost
> successful reconnection anyhow. It was just waiting. It didn't affect
> the connection state.
>
> After this patch the waiting is dropped to try to talk to the
> disconnected nodes later on a next master discovery iteration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-04 0:19 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 0/2] VShard replica backoff, part 1 Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-04 0:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 1/2] router: drop wait_connected from master discovery Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-05 17:44 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-06 23:34 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-07 6:49 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-12-04 0:19 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 2/2] router: don't fallback RO to master right away Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-05 17:53 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-06 23:56 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-07 6:49 ` Oleg Babin via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-07 22:38 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 0/2] VShard replica backoff, part 1 Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26e0daed-6f28-c5de-eb8c-8c6a70f09560@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=olegrok@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH vshard 1/2] router: drop wait_connected from master discovery' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox