[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Actually implement maxirconst trace limit.

Sergey Ostanevich sergos at tarantool.org
Sat Jan 29 00:28:47 MSK 2022


Just to avoid misreading : LGTM

Best regards,
Sergos 

Friday, 28 January 2022, 18:11 +0300 from Kaplun Sergey  <skaplun at tarantool.org>:
>Hi, Sergos!
>
>Thanks for the review!
>
>On 28.01.22, sergos wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> I reviewed the one at  https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/commit/2cdd5ac0367629d2f37489dd842d9a6b068cf12c < https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/commit/2cdd5ac0367629d2f37489dd842d9a6b068cf12c >
>> 
>> Overall is LGTM, I would like to update the 2nd test message to something like
>> ’trace should not appear due to maxirconst limit’
>
>Fixed, see the iterative patch below.
>Branch is force-pushed.
>
>===================================================================
>diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>index 79553ecb..10de2520 100644
>--- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>@@ -38,6 +38,6 @@ irconst4()
> irconst4()
> jit.off()
> test:ok(ntrace_old == misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num,
>-        'trace number is the same')
>+        'trace should not appear due to maxirconst limit')
> 
> os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
>===================================================================
>
>> 
>> Sergos
>> 
>> > On 28 Jan 2022, at 15:35, Sergey Kaplun < skaplun at tarantool.org > wrote:
>> > 
>> > Igor,
>> > 
>> > On 28.01.22, Igor Munkin wrote:
>> >> Sergey,
>> >> 
>> >> On 28.01.22, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
>> >>> Igor,
>> >>> 
>> >>> Thanks for the review!
>> >>> 
>> >> 
>> >> <snipped>
>> >> 
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>>> Issue:  https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/430
>> >>>>> Branch:  https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-430-maxirconst-actually-implement-full-ci
>> >>>>> Tarantool branch:  https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/lj-430-maxirconst-actually-implement-full-ci
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>>> src/lj_record.c                               |  5 ++-
>> >>>>> .../lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua                | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
>> >>>>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>>>> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> <snipped>
>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>> >>>>> new file mode 100644
>> >>>>> index 00000000..1829b37d
>> >>>>> --- /dev/null
>> >>>>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
>> >>>>> +-- XXX: avoid any other traces compilation due to hotcount
>> >>>>> +-- collisions for predictible results.
>> >> 
>> >> <snipped>
>> >> 
>> >>>>> +jit.off()
>> >>>>> +jit.flush()
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> Minor: I'd rather move this part closer to 'jit.opt.start' to save the
>> >>>> test structure closer to the other test chunks. Feel free to ignore.
>> >>> 
>> >>> I really want to exclude __any__ JIT work here to avoid false-positive
>> >>> hotcount (was precendents during writing this test :)). Ignoring.
>> >> 
>> >> OK, got it.
>> >> 
>> >>> 
>> >> 
>> >> <snipped>
>> >> 
>> >>>>> +test:ok(ntrace_old + 1 == misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num,
>> >>>>> +	'trace number increases')
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> Typo: I doubt we use tabs in Lua sources, but I might be wrong...
>> >>> 
>> >>> I suggest to use quarter tabs indent style as we use for C code and Mike
>> >>> use in src/jit/*.lua (see bcsave.lua for example).
>> >>> 
>> >>> There was no precedent before, IINM :).
>> >> 
>> >> See test/tarantool-tests/lj-695-ffi-vararg-call.test.lua[1].
>> > 
>> > Fixed, repushed.
>> > 
>> >> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> +
>> >>>>> +ntrace_old = misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num
>> >>>>> +jit.on()
>> >>>>> +irconst4()
>> >>>>> +irconst4()
>> >>>>> +jit.off()
>> >>>>> +test:ok(ntrace_old == misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num,
>> >>>>> +	'trace number is the same')
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> Ditto.
>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> +
>> >>>>> +os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
>> >>>>> -- 
>> >>>>> 2.34.1
>> >>>>> 
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> -- 
>> >>>> Best regards,
>> >>>> IM
>> >>> 
>> >>> -- 
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> Sergey Kaplun
>> >> 
>> >> [1]:  https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/blob/tarantool/test/tarantool-tests/lj-695-ffi-vararg-call.test.lua
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> IM
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > Best regards,
>> > Sergey Kaplun
>> 
>
>-- 
>Best regards,
>Sergey Kaplun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/attachments/20220129/01edc5c0/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tarantool-patches mailing list