[Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Actually implement maxirconst trace limit.
Sergey Ostanevich
sergos at tarantool.org
Sat Jan 29 00:28:47 MSK 2022
Just to avoid misreading : LGTM
Best regards,
Sergos
Friday, 28 January 2022, 18:11 +0300 from Kaplun Sergey <skaplun at tarantool.org>:
>Hi, Sergos!
>
>Thanks for the review!
>
>On 28.01.22, sergos wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I reviewed the one at https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/commit/2cdd5ac0367629d2f37489dd842d9a6b068cf12c < https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/commit/2cdd5ac0367629d2f37489dd842d9a6b068cf12c >
>>
>> Overall is LGTM, I would like to update the 2nd test message to something like
>> ’trace should not appear due to maxirconst limit’
>
>Fixed, see the iterative patch below.
>Branch is force-pushed.
>
>===================================================================
>diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>index 79553ecb..10de2520 100644
>--- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>@@ -38,6 +38,6 @@ irconst4()
> irconst4()
> jit.off()
> test:ok(ntrace_old == misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num,
>- 'trace number is the same')
>+ 'trace should not appear due to maxirconst limit')
>
> os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
>===================================================================
>
>>
>> Sergos
>>
>> > On 28 Jan 2022, at 15:35, Sergey Kaplun < skaplun at tarantool.org > wrote:
>> >
>> > Igor,
>> >
>> > On 28.01.22, Igor Munkin wrote:
>> >> Sergey,
>> >>
>> >> On 28.01.22, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
>> >>> Igor,
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the review!
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> <snipped>
>> >>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Issue: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/430
>> >>>>> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-430-maxirconst-actually-implement-full-ci
>> >>>>> Tarantool branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/lj-430-maxirconst-actually-implement-full-ci
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> src/lj_record.c | 5 ++-
>> >>>>> .../lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
>> >>>>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>>>> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> <snipped>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>> >>>>> new file mode 100644
>> >>>>> index 00000000..1829b37d
>> >>>>> --- /dev/null
>> >>>>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-430-maxirconst.test.lua
>> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
>> >>>>> +-- XXX: avoid any other traces compilation due to hotcount
>> >>>>> +-- collisions for predictible results.
>> >>
>> >> <snipped>
>> >>
>> >>>>> +jit.off()
>> >>>>> +jit.flush()
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Minor: I'd rather move this part closer to 'jit.opt.start' to save the
>> >>>> test structure closer to the other test chunks. Feel free to ignore.
>> >>>
>> >>> I really want to exclude __any__ JIT work here to avoid false-positive
>> >>> hotcount (was precendents during writing this test :)). Ignoring.
>> >>
>> >> OK, got it.
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> <snipped>
>> >>
>> >>>>> +test:ok(ntrace_old + 1 == misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num,
>> >>>>> + 'trace number increases')
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Typo: I doubt we use tabs in Lua sources, but I might be wrong...
>> >>>
>> >>> I suggest to use quarter tabs indent style as we use for C code and Mike
>> >>> use in src/jit/*.lua (see bcsave.lua for example).
>> >>>
>> >>> There was no precedent before, IINM :).
>> >>
>> >> See test/tarantool-tests/lj-695-ffi-vararg-call.test.lua[1].
>> >
>> > Fixed, repushed.
>> >
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> +
>> >>>>> +ntrace_old = misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num
>> >>>>> +jit.on()
>> >>>>> +irconst4()
>> >>>>> +irconst4()
>> >>>>> +jit.off()
>> >>>>> +test:ok(ntrace_old == misc.getmetrics().jit_trace_num,
>> >>>>> + 'trace number is the same')
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ditto.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> +
>> >>>>> +os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> 2.34.1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Best regards,
>> >>>> IM
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> Sergey Kaplun
>> >>
>> >> [1]: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/blob/tarantool/test/tarantool-tests/lj-695-ffi-vararg-call.test.lua
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> IM
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> > Sergey Kaplun
>>
>
>--
>Best regards,
>Sergey Kaplun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/attachments/20220129/01edc5c0/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tarantool-patches
mailing list