From: Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Handle stack reallocation in debug.setmetatable() and lua_setmetatable(). Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:50:05 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <pjr6gl3xxhy4mtmwxcn3okorvtm6vd352widh63p2qe62wltct@qk2uz6z3qbr6> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240311103701.24502-1-skaplun@tarantool.org> Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the patch! Please consider my comments below. The test passes before the patch, as can be seen in CI for this branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/mkokryashkin/test On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 01:37:01PM +0300, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > From: Mike Pall <mike> > > Thanks to Sergey Kaplun. > > (cherry picked from commit 88ed9fdbbba632d174a473a0a97c914089c2916d) > > When we use the aforementioned functions to set a metatable for types > with one shared metatable, we must flush all traces since they are > specialized to base metatables. If we have enabled vmevent handlers, > they invoke a callback on trace flushing. This callback may reallocate > the Lua stack. Thus invalidates the reference to the `TValue *` object > `o` by the given index in the `lua_setmetatable()` and leads to a > heap-use-after-free error. > > This patch fixes the behaviour by recalculating the address by the given > index after possible stack reallocation. > > Sergey Kaplun: > * added the description and the test for the problem > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#9595 > --- > > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1172-debug-handling-ref > Tarantool PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/9786 > Related issues: > * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9595 > * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1172 > > > src/lj_api.c | 1 + > .../lj-1172-debug-handling-ref.test.lua | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1172-debug-handling-ref.test.lua > > diff --git a/src/lj_api.c b/src/lj_api.c > index 3bacad33..2e915306 100644 > --- a/src/lj_api.c > +++ b/src/lj_api.c > @@ -1067,6 +1067,7 @@ LUA_API int lua_setmetatable(lua_State *L, int idx) > /* Flush cache, since traces specialize to basemt. But not during __gc. */ > if (lj_trace_flushall(L)) > lj_err_caller(L, LJ_ERR_NOGCMM); > + o = index2adr(L, idx); /* Stack may have been reallocated. */ > if (tvisbool(o)) { > /* NOBARRIER: basemt is a GC root. */ > setgcref(basemt_it(g, LJ_TTRUE), obj2gco(mt)); > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1172-debug-handling-ref.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1172-debug-handling-ref.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..cac1c223 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1172-debug-handling-ref.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +local tap = require('tap') > + > +-- Test file to demonstrate the heap-use-after-free, error for > +-- `debug.setmetatable()` and enabled `jit.dump()`. > +-- The test fails under ASAN. > +-- See also: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1172. > + > +local test = tap.test('lj-1172-debug-handling-ref'):skipcond({ > + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(), > +}) > + > +local jdump = require('jit.dump') > + > +test:plan(1) > + > +jdump.start('t', '/dev/null') Why do we need that call here? > + > +-- Use `coroutine.wrap()` to create a new Lua stack with a minimum > +-- number of stack slots. > +coroutine.wrap(function() > + -- "TRACE flush" event handler causes stack reallocation and How is flush event caused? > + -- leads to heap-use-after-free. This event handler is called > + -- because all traces are specialized to base metatables, so > + -- if we update any base metatable, we must flush all traces. > + debug.setmetatable(1, {}) > +end)() > + > +test:ok(true, 'no heap-use-after-free error') > + > +test:done(true) > -- > 2.44.0 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 20:50 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-11 10:37 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-03-11 20:50 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2024-03-12 5:43 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-03-12 11:58 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-03-13 7:46 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-03-13 8:49 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-04-04 9:38 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-04-11 17:02 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=pjr6gl3xxhy4mtmwxcn3okorvtm6vd352widh63p2qe62wltct@qk2uz6z3qbr6 \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Handle stack reallocation in debug.setmetatable() and lua_setmetatable().' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox