From: Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Maintain chain invariant in DCE. Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 12:36:40 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <juqtxncc26g64qgfmhkmhwey7mlevde5e24gm3mxtirymfb5m4@6ngl52ufiutg> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240517132918.25926-1-skaplun@tarantool.org> Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the patch! Please consider my comments below. On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:29:18PM UTC, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > From: Mike Pall <mike> > > Thanks to Peter Cawley. > > (cherry picked from commit f72c19e482b6f918b7cf42b0436e2b117d160a29) > > Instructions with strong guards that are sometimes emitted with a guard > and sometimes emitted without a guard (like HREFK, CONV, or SLOAD) may > be eliminated from the IR chain and replaced with the NOP IR. If the > next IR of the same kind on the trace is not eliminated, it may > reference the IR NOP instead of an instruction of the same type. This > may lead to the corresponding assertion failure in the `rec_check_ir()`. > > This patch unconditionally links the IRs during chain maintenance in > DCE. > > Sergey Kaplun: > * added the description and the test for the problem > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#9924 > --- > > Be aware that the reproducer from the ticket does not lead to the > assertion failure (this is why it is omitted in the test). I suppose it > just illustrates the situation when the IR is left off the chain. > Although the reproducer is clumsy, I can't simplify it or make it less > tricky. Please, ideas are welcome :). The test doesn't reproduce before the patch on ARM64. Tested on M1 with the following flags: | -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLUA_USE_ASSERT=ON \ | -DLUAJIT_ENABLE_CHECKHOOK=ON` > > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1094-ir-chain-dce > Related Issues: > * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9924 > * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1094 > > src/lj_opt_dce.c | 2 +- > .../lj-1094-ir-chain-dce.test.lua | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1094-ir-chain-dce.test.lua > > diff --git a/src/lj_opt_dce.c b/src/lj_opt_dce.c > index 2417f324..6948179c 100644 > --- a/src/lj_opt_dce.c > +++ b/src/lj_opt_dce.c > @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ static void dce_propagate(jit_State *J) > IRIns *ir = IR(ins); > if (irt_ismarked(ir->t)) { > irt_clearmark(ir->t); > - pchain[ir->o] = &ir->prev; > } else if (!ir_sideeff(ir)) { > *pchain[ir->o] = ir->prev; /* Reroute original instruction chain. */ > ir->t.irt = IRT_NIL; > @@ -53,6 +52,7 @@ static void dce_propagate(jit_State *J) > ir->prev = 0; > continue; > } > + pchain[ir->o] = &ir->prev; > if (ir->op1 >= REF_FIRST) irt_setmark(IR(ir->op1)->t); > if (ir->op2 >= REF_FIRST) irt_setmark(IR(ir->op2)->t); > } > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1094-ir-chain-dce.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1094-ir-chain-dce.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..3faae7d4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1094-ir-chain-dce.test.lua <snipped>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-26 9:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-05-17 13:29 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-26 9:36 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2024-05-27 7:25 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-27 8:29 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-14 13:47 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-16 19:35 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-17 8:44 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-07-09 8:04 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=juqtxncc26g64qgfmhkmhwey7mlevde5e24gm3mxtirymfb5m4@6ngl52ufiutg \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Maintain chain invariant in DCE.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox