Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>,
	Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Limit exponent range in number parsing.
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:47:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc4661f2-c2a1-40f1-b17e-596c4532a5eb@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbAsOB8rIKe0APjb@root>

Hi, Sergey!

thanks for the patch!


On 1/24/24 00:14, Sergey Kaplun wrote:


<snipped>

> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-788-limit-exponents-range.test.lua
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +local tap = require('tap')
> +
> +-- Test file to demonstrate incorrect behaviour of exponent number
> +-- form parsing.
> +-- See also: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/788.
> +local test = tap.test('lj-788-limit-exponents-range')
> +test:plan(2)
> +
> +-- Before the patch, the powers greater than (1 << 16) * 10
> +-- (655360) were parsed incorrectly. After the patch, powers
> +-- greater than 1 << 20 (1048576 `STRSCAN_MAXEXP`) are considered
> +-- invalid. See <src/lj_strscan.c> for details.
> +-- Choose the first value between these values and the second
> +-- value bigger than `STRSCAN_MAXEXP` to check parsing correctness

typical values on testing boundaries [1] are: value before the boundary,

boundary value and value after the boundary. So I propose to test these 
three values.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary-value_analysis

> +-- for the first one, and `STRSCAN_ERROR` for the second case.
> +local PARSABLE_EXP_POWER  = 1000000
> +local TOO_LARGE_EXP_POWER = 1050000
> +
> +local function form_exp_string(n)
> +  return '0.' .. string.rep('0', n - 1) .. '1e' .. tostring(n)
> +end
> +
> +test:is(tonumber(form_exp_string(PARSABLE_EXP_POWER)), 1,
> +        'correct parsing of large exponent')
> +
> +test:is(tonumber(form_exp_string(TOO_LARGE_EXP_POWER)), nil,
> +        'too big exponent power is not parsed')
> +
> +test:done(true)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-21  8:52 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-11-21 23:14 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 21:14 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-25  7:47   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2024-01-25 10:06     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-25 16:31       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-15 13:50 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc4661f2-c2a1-40f1-b17e-596c4532a5eb@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Limit exponent range in number parsing.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox