From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Cc: kostja@tarantool.org
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/2] swim: implement and expose transport-level encryption
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:52:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb2bdded-1e61-4b5d-fafc-f722e098fccb@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f06694d23bd5fc3e630a42244089193371ce7b3.1556561487.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
I rethought the API and decided that it lacks
flexibility - I can't change private key without
passing crypto algorithm again, in swim_set_codec.
There are some solutions:
- Move algo and key to swim_cfg, and make both of them
optional. But it pads out swim_cfg(), which at this moment
is quite compact, atomic, and contains only really
necessary parameters.
- Make swim_set_codec arguments optional. Then a one could
change private key like this: swim_set_codec(-1, new_key).
These solutions are simple and not too intrusive. But probably we
should do something more global - get rid of swim_cfg and split it
into separate
swim_set_<option>(option_value)
functions. It will look like this:
swim_listen()
swim_set_uuid()
swim_set_ack_timeout()
swim_set_heartbeat_rate()
swim_set_gc_mode()
swim_set_codec()
swim_set_payload()
Therefore it won't be atomic to update several parameters at once.
On the other hand, it looks more consistent and just like box.cfg.
Now the API looks like this:
swim_cfg(uri, heartbeat, ack, gc, uuid)
swim_set_codec()
swim_set_payload()
Please, tell your opinion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 18:13 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] swim crypto Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-29 18:13 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] swim: split send/recv into phases Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-29 18:13 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/2] swim: implement and expose transport-level encryption Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-05-08 8:52 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2019-05-08 9:11 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-05-02 15:43 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/2] swim crypto Vladislav Shpilevoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb2bdded-1e61-4b5d-fafc-f722e098fccb@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=kostja@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/2] swim: implement and expose transport-level encryption' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox