From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Cc: kostja@tarantool.org Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/2] swim: implement and expose transport-level encryption Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:52:01 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <fb2bdded-1e61-4b5d-fafc-f722e098fccb@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5f06694d23bd5fc3e630a42244089193371ce7b3.1556561487.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> I rethought the API and decided that it lacks flexibility - I can't change private key without passing crypto algorithm again, in swim_set_codec. There are some solutions: - Move algo and key to swim_cfg, and make both of them optional. But it pads out swim_cfg(), which at this moment is quite compact, atomic, and contains only really necessary parameters. - Make swim_set_codec arguments optional. Then a one could change private key like this: swim_set_codec(-1, new_key). These solutions are simple and not too intrusive. But probably we should do something more global - get rid of swim_cfg and split it into separate swim_set_<option>(option_value) functions. It will look like this: swim_listen() swim_set_uuid() swim_set_ack_timeout() swim_set_heartbeat_rate() swim_set_gc_mode() swim_set_codec() swim_set_payload() Therefore it won't be atomic to update several parameters at once. On the other hand, it looks more consistent and just like box.cfg. Now the API looks like this: swim_cfg(uri, heartbeat, ack, gc, uuid) swim_set_codec() swim_set_payload() Please, tell your opinion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 8:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-29 18:13 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] swim crypto Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-29 18:13 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] swim: split send/recv into phases Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-29 18:13 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/2] swim: implement and expose transport-level encryption Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-05-08 8:52 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message] 2019-05-08 9:11 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2019-05-02 15:43 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/2] swim crypto Vladislav Shpilevoy
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=fb2bdded-1e61-4b5d-fafc-f722e098fccb@tarantool.org \ --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --cc=kostja@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/2] swim: implement and expose transport-level encryption' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox