From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> To: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>, tarantool-patches@freelists.org Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add surrogate ID for BINARY collation Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 15:34:55 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f72b09c8-2994-6edc-8151-83fb9b42fab7@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <80794eb0182261e1887adc60c170c550de91fabc.1540460716.git.korablev@tarantool.org> Hi! Thanks for the patch! See 3 comments below. > diff --git a/src/box/key_def.h b/src/box/key_def.h > index 20e79f9fe..ecdc199d9 100644 > --- a/src/box/key_def.h > +++ b/src/box/key_def.h > @@ -78,6 +78,23 @@ extern const struct key_part_def key_part_def_default; > */ > #define COLL_NONE UINT32_MAX > > +/** > + * In SQL explicitly specified binary collation and absence of > + * any collation are different in behaviour: according to ANSI > + * it is prohibited to compare strings with different explicitly > + * indicated collations. However, if one of collation is default, > + * (i.e. absent) the second one will be forced. > + * So, lets introduce another id to indicate explicitly specified > + * binary collation. 1. Sorry, I am not sure that we can use imperative while describing not functions. 2. I see, that you actually created a 'phantom' collation. A collation, that has no a record in the collation cache, but is visible to a user via space format. I think for externally visible changes you should consult Kostja. Alternatively, it is possible to create binary collation in the same way as unicode and unicode_ci - via insertion into _collation in upgrade script. Also, I see a bug that we can create a collation in _collation with id = COLL_NONE and COLL_BINARY, but which actually are not NONE nor BINARY. Storing such identifiers in _collation should be prohibited (if we will leave current 'phantom' binary collation as is). Furthermore COLL_NONE for unknown reason is declared in key_def.h instead of coll_id.h. It should be moved out. It is worth to create a separate commit with refactoring right before this one. > + */ > +#define COLL_BINARY (UINT32_MAX - 1) > + > +static inline bool > +coll_is_missing(uint32_t coll_id) > +{ > + return coll_id == COLL_NONE || coll_id == COLL_BINARY; > +} Hence, this should be moved to coll_id.h as well and renamed to coll_id_is_missing. > diff --git a/test/sql/collation.test.lua b/test/sql/collation.test.lua > index 935dea824..f9d653717 100644 > --- a/test/sql/collation.test.lua > +++ b/test/sql/collation.test.lua > @@ -42,4 +42,12 @@ cn = remote.connect(box.cfg.listen) > cn:execute('select 1 limit ? collate not_exist', {1}) > > cn:close() > + > +-- Explicitly set BINARY collation has ID. 3. Please, add more tests, especially for box when you set id to 4294967294. > +-- > +box.sql.execute("CREATE TABLE t (id INT PRIMARY KEY, a TEXT, b TEXT COLLATE BINARY);") > +box.space.T:format()[2]['collation'] > +box.space.T:format()[3]['collation'] > +box.sql.execute("DROP TABLE t;") > + > box.schema.user.revoke('guest', 'read,write,execute', 'universe') >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-31 12:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-25 11:00 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/3] Change collation compatibility rules according to ANSI SQL Nikita Pettik 2018-10-25 11:00 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] sql: do not add explicit <COLLATE "BINARY"> clause Nikita Pettik 2018-10-25 11:00 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Add surrogate ID for BINARY collation Nikita Pettik 2018-10-31 12:34 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message] 2018-10-31 15:47 ` [tarantool-patches] " n.pettik 2018-11-01 11:37 ` Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-01 12:22 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2018-11-01 12:58 ` Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-01 13:08 ` n.pettik 2018-11-01 15:39 ` Konstantin Osipov [not found] ` <95CB17D5-E3ED-4B05-A289-983E2FD0DE37@gmail.com> 2018-11-01 17:45 ` n.pettik 2018-11-01 20:00 ` Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-01 20:06 ` Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-01 20:20 ` n.pettik 2018-10-25 11:00 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/3] sql: change collation compatibility rules Nikita Pettik 2018-10-31 12:34 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2018-11-12 23:46 ` n.pettik
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=f72b09c8-2994-6edc-8151-83fb9b42fab7@tarantool.org \ --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --cc=korablev@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add surrogate ID for BINARY collation' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox