From: Aleksandr Lyapunov <alyapunov@tarantool.org>
To: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 03/13] vinyl: rename tx_manager -> vy_tx_manager
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:17:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6dff250-aed2-d43e-7177-28eb33e1972c@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715160457.GD26087@tarantool.org>
I'm not sure.. Actually I believe one there will be only one
cross-engine transaction engine..
That's why I made it outstanding. But actually I'm note sure it's possible.
What do you think is better? use memtx specific name and if/when it'll
be possible
to used in both engines - rename it OR use general name and rename to memtx
specific if/when it becomes obvious that it's not possible?
On 15.07.2020 19:04, Nikita Pettik wrote:
> On 15 Jul 16:55, Aleksandr Lyapunov wrote:
>> Apart from other vinyl objects that are named with "vy_" prefix,
>> its transaction manager (tx_manager) have no such prefix.
>> It should have in order to avoid conflicts with global tx manager.
>>
>> Needed for #4897
>> ---
> LGTM. The only concern I have now - mb we'd better call
> new TX manager in memtx not tx_manager, but mem_tx_manager or
> memtx_tx_manager? I mean tx_ prefix is more general than memtx_..
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 13:55 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 00/13] Transaction engine for memtx engine Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 01/13] Update license file (2020) Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 02/13] Check data_offset overflow in struct tuple Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-16 14:27 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 03/13] vinyl: rename tx_manager -> vy_tx_manager Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:04 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-16 8:17 ` Aleksandr Lyapunov [this message]
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 04/13] txm: introduce dirty tuples Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:22 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-16 0:05 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 05/13] txm: save txn in txn_stmt Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:23 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 06/13] txm: add TX status Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:42 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-16 0:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 07/13] txm: save does_require_old_tuple flag in txn_stmt Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:49 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-16 0:09 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 08/13] txm: introduce tx manager Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:51 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-15 22:01 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-16 0:10 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 09/13] tmx: introduce prepare sequence number Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 17:13 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-07-16 0:11 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 10/13] tmx: introduce conflict tracker Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-16 0:16 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 11/13] txm: introduce txm_story Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-16 0:20 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-17 6:16 ` Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-16 22:25 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 12/13] txm: clarify all fetched tuples Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 13:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 13/13] tmx: use new tx manager in memtx Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-16 22:26 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-17 5:08 ` Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-23 20:58 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-07-15 15:47 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 00/13] Transaction engine for memtx engine Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:38 ` Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:39 ` Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-15 16:40 ` Aleksandr Lyapunov
2020-07-16 0:05 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6dff250-aed2-d43e-7177-28eb33e1972c@tarantool.org \
--to=alyapunov@tarantool.org \
--cc=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 03/13] vinyl: rename tx_manager -> vy_tx_manager' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox