From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/1] app: exit gracefully when a main script throws an error
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:53:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f49ce585-eee9-d3bf-e1d8-41d0a68e0e14@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024002155.6tn2b2zrju7wmi2n@tkn_work_nb>
Hi!
On 24/10/2019 02:21, Alexander Turenko wrote:
> I know, the patch was already pushed, but I looked on it briefly anyway.
>
If something is wrong, it may be fixed as a follow up.
> It is LGTM, however I have one question: see below.
>
> WBR, Alexander Turenko.
>
>> @@ -678,6 +686,12 @@ tarantool_lua_run_script(char *path, bool interactive,
>> ev_run(loop(), 0);
>> /* The fiber running the startup script has ended. */
>> script_fiber = NULL;
>> + /*
>> + * Result can't be obtained via fiber_join - script fiber
>> + * never dies if os.exit() was called. This is why diag
>> + * is checked explicitly.
>> + */
>> + return diag_is_empty(diag_get()) ? 0 : -1;
>
> This is the only part I'm a bit tentative: can the diagnostic area be
> populated by a user somehow? I tried to do--
>
> | fio.open('non_existent', {'O_RDONLY'})
> | os.exit()
>
> --in the main script and it seems that it uses some other diagnostic
> area, because the fio error was not reported as the main script fail.
Should it have been reported?
Talking of why it is not now - well, yes, it uses another diagnostics
area. tarantool_lua_run_script() starts a special fiber to run a
script or a console. And the error is forwarded to the main fiber
only when the script fiber does it voluntary, in the end of
run_script_f().
In case of os.exit() the script fiber never finishes, and therefore
never moves its diag to the main fiber. Os.exit() breaks event loop
and freezes the current fiber. It makes ev_run() return in
tarantool_lua_run_script(). After that we see that the diag is empty,
because the script fiber never got to the point of filling it.
>
> So, things seems to work good, but I didn't got how exactly.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 22:00 [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-10-24 0:21 ` [Tarantool-patches] " Alexander Turenko
2019-10-24 19:53 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2019-10-24 23:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [tarantool-patches] " Alexander Turenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f49ce585-eee9-d3bf-e1d8-41d0a68e0e14@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/1] app: exit gracefully when a main script throws an error' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox