From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> To: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/1] app: exit gracefully when a main script throws an error Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:53:17 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f49ce585-eee9-d3bf-e1d8-41d0a68e0e14@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191024002155.6tn2b2zrju7wmi2n@tkn_work_nb> Hi! On 24/10/2019 02:21, Alexander Turenko wrote: > I know, the patch was already pushed, but I looked on it briefly anyway. > If something is wrong, it may be fixed as a follow up. > It is LGTM, however I have one question: see below. > > WBR, Alexander Turenko. > >> @@ -678,6 +686,12 @@ tarantool_lua_run_script(char *path, bool interactive, >> ev_run(loop(), 0); >> /* The fiber running the startup script has ended. */ >> script_fiber = NULL; >> + /* >> + * Result can't be obtained via fiber_join - script fiber >> + * never dies if os.exit() was called. This is why diag >> + * is checked explicitly. >> + */ >> + return diag_is_empty(diag_get()) ? 0 : -1; > > This is the only part I'm a bit tentative: can the diagnostic area be > populated by a user somehow? I tried to do-- > > | fio.open('non_existent', {'O_RDONLY'}) > | os.exit() > > --in the main script and it seems that it uses some other diagnostic > area, because the fio error was not reported as the main script fail. Should it have been reported? Talking of why it is not now - well, yes, it uses another diagnostics area. tarantool_lua_run_script() starts a special fiber to run a script or a console. And the error is forwarded to the main fiber only when the script fiber does it voluntary, in the end of run_script_f(). In case of os.exit() the script fiber never finishes, and therefore never moves its diag to the main fiber. Os.exit() breaks event loop and freezes the current fiber. It makes ev_run() return in tarantool_lua_run_script(). After that we see that the diag is empty, because the script fiber never got to the point of filling it. > > So, things seems to work good, but I didn't got how exactly. >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 19:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-09-10 22:00 [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-10-24 0:21 ` [Tarantool-patches] " Alexander Turenko 2019-10-24 19:53 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message] 2019-10-24 23:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [tarantool-patches] " Alexander Turenko
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=f49ce585-eee9-d3bf-e1d8-41d0a68e0e14@tarantool.org \ --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 1/1] app: exit gracefully when a main script throws an error' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox