Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 5/5] limbo: filter incoming requests
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:59:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f25429a1-cc9f-9b0c-2bf6-edc356872662@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210714212328.701280-6-gorcunov@gmail.com>



15.07.2021 00:23, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет:
> FIXME: This is incomplete PoC
>
> Closes #6036
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> ---
>   src/box/applier.cc  |  3 +++
>   src/box/txn_limbo.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   src/box/txn_limbo.h |  9 +++++++-
>   3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/box/applier.cc b/src/box/applier.cc
> index 838aa372d..c3f3a154a 100644
> --- a/src/box/applier.cc
> +++ b/src/box/applier.cc
> @@ -871,6 +871,9 @@ apply_synchro_row(uint32_t replica_id, struct xrow_header *row)
>   		goto err;
>   
>   	txn_limbo_promote_lock(&txn_limbo);
> +	if (txn_limbo_filter_locked(&txn_limbo, &req) != 0)
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +
>   	struct replica_cb_data rcb_data;
>   	struct synchro_entry entry;
>   	/*
> diff --git a/src/box/txn_limbo.c b/src/box/txn_limbo.c
> index d24df3606..330ba57b2 100644
> --- a/src/box/txn_limbo.c
> +++ b/src/box/txn_limbo.c
> @@ -731,6 +731,40 @@ txn_limbo_wait_empty(struct txn_limbo *limbo, double timeout)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +int
> +txn_limbo_filter_locked(struct txn_limbo *limbo,
> +			const struct synchro_request *req)
> +{
> +	struct txn_limbo_promote *pmt = &limbo->promote;
> +	uint32_t replica_id = req->origin_id;
> +	uint64_t term = req->term;
> +
> +	panic_on(!txn_limbo_promote_is_locked(limbo),
> +		 "limbo: unlocked filtering of a request");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In case of split brain has happened the promote
> +	 * request may come in with already seen term.
> +	 */
> +	uint64_t seen_term = txn_limbo_term_locked(limbo, replica_id);

You need to filter by "term_max". Any term smaller than "term_max"
is bad.

> +	if (seen_term >= term) {
> +		if (iproto_type_is_promote_request(req->type) &&
> +		    pmt->terms_max > 1) {
> +			say_info("RAFT: rejecting %s obsolete request "
> +				 "from instance id %u term %llu. "
> +				 "Current max term %llu.",
> +				 iproto_type_name(req->type),
> +				 replica_id, (long long)term,
> +				 (long long)pmt->terms_max);
> +			diag_set(ClientError, ER_UNSUPPORTED,
> +				 "Replication", "obsolete terms");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   void
>   txn_limbo_process_locked(struct txn_limbo *limbo,
>   			 const struct synchro_request *req)
> @@ -742,19 +776,14 @@ txn_limbo_process_locked(struct txn_limbo *limbo,
>   	panic_on(!txn_limbo_promote_is_locked(limbo),
>   		 "limbo: unlocked processing of a request");
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Update promote tracking since bad requests must
> +	 * be filtered out already.
> +	 */
>   	if (txn_limbo_term_locked(limbo, origin) < term) {

Filtering was done above,  shouldn't this if(() always evaluate to true now?

>   		vclock_follow(&pmt->terms_map, origin, term);
>   		if (term > pmt->terms_max)
>   			pmt->terms_max = term;
> -	} else if (iproto_type_is_promote_request(req->type) &&
> -		   pmt->terms_max > 1) {
> -		/* PROMOTE for outdated term. Ignore. */
> -		say_info("RAFT: ignoring %s request from instance "
> -			 "id %u for term %llu. Greatest term seen "
> -			 "before (%llu) is bigger.",
> -			 iproto_type_name(req->type), origin, (long long)term,
> -			 (long long)pmt->terms_max);
> -		return;
>   	}
>   
>   	int64_t lsn = req->lsn;
> @@ -800,12 +829,15 @@ txn_limbo_process_locked(struct txn_limbo *limbo,
>   	return;
>   }
>   
> -void
> +int
>   txn_limbo_process(struct txn_limbo *limbo, const struct synchro_request *req)
>   {
>   	txn_limbo_promote_lock(limbo);
> +	if (txn_limbo_filter_locked(limbo, req) != 0)
> +		return -1;
>   	txn_limbo_process_locked(limbo, req);
>   	txn_limbo_promote_unlock(limbo);
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   void
> diff --git a/src/box/txn_limbo.h b/src/box/txn_limbo.h
> index a2595bcff..bfdfef0e0 100644
> --- a/src/box/txn_limbo.h
> +++ b/src/box/txn_limbo.h
> @@ -358,8 +358,15 @@ txn_limbo_ack(struct txn_limbo *limbo, uint32_t replica_id, int64_t lsn);
>   int
>   txn_limbo_wait_complete(struct txn_limbo *limbo, struct txn_limbo_entry *entry);
>   
> +/**
> + * Verify if the request is valid for processing.
> + */
> +int
> +txn_limbo_filter_locked(struct txn_limbo *limbo,
> +			const struct synchro_request *req);
> +
>   /** Execute a synchronous replication request. */
> -void
> +int
>   txn_limbo_process(struct txn_limbo *limbo, const struct synchro_request *req);
>   
>   void

-- 
Serge Petrenko


      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-15 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-14 21:23 [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 0/5] limbo: implement packets filtering Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 1/5] latch: add latch_is_locked helper Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:15   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 2/5] say: introduce panic_on helper Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 3/5] limbo: gather promote tracking into a separate structure Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:28   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:46     ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 12:00       ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 12:20         ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 4/5] limbo: order access to the promote terms Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:48   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 12:20     ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 5/5] limbo: filter incoming requests Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:59   ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f25429a1-cc9f-9b0c-2bf6-edc356872662@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 5/5] limbo: filter incoming requests' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox