From: Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] x86/x64: Fix math.ceil(-0.9) result sign. Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 12:44:11 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ejcjnahaocbxsy3gjd6ksxkrovhkxe5a4l7pbh3e2qgc2fvzwr@gvxwyxc3d63q> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231102123616.10527-1-skaplun@tarantool.org> Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the patch! LGTM, except for a few nits below. On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:36:16PM +0300, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > From: Mike Pall <mike> > > Reported by minoki. > > (cherry-picked from commit 674afcd4e21d0cf64de3219d347557a0aed8ecc7) > > The `ceil` (`floor`) math function implementation calculates (|x| + > 2^52) - 2^52 for its argument to determine the fractional part of x , so Typo: s/x ,/x,/ > it will be rounded to the nearest integer and its sign is restored. > After that, if the original value is < (>) than the result, the -1 (1) > is subtracted from it. Take a look at the `ceil()` case. The result of > the operation `-1 - (-1)` is +0 for FP arithmetic, against -0 expected > as a result. > > This patch changes the `- (-1)` operation to `+ 1` and restores sign > after it again. > > NB: Since in DUALNUM mode on x86/x64 all results are tried to be > converted to integers the sign of 0 is neglected. Typo: s/integers/integers,/ > > Sergey Kaplun: > * added the description and the test for the problem > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#9145 > --- > > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-859-math-ceil-sign > Tarantool PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/9326 > Related issues: > * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/859 > * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9145 > > src/vm_x64.dasc | 13 ++++++------ > src/vm_x86.dasc | 13 ++++++------ > .../lj-859-math-ceil-sign.test.lua | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-859-math-ceil-sign.test.lua > > diff --git a/src/vm_x64.dasc b/src/vm_x64.dasc > index 399dfcbf..fc4c6259 100644 > --- a/src/vm_x64.dasc > +++ b/src/vm_x64.dasc > @@ -400,9 +400,6 @@ > |.macro sseconst_1, reg, tmp // Synthesize 1.0. > | sseconst_hi reg, tmp, 3ff00000 > |.endmacro > -|.macro sseconst_m1, reg, tmp // Synthesize -1.0. > -| sseconst_hi reg, tmp, bff00000 > -|.endmacro > |.macro sseconst_2p52, reg, tmp // Synthesize 2^52. > | sseconst_hi reg, tmp, 43300000 > |.endmacro > @@ -2598,15 +2595,17 @@ static void build_subroutines(BuildCtx *ctx) > | addsd xmm1, xmm3 // (|x| + 2^52) - 2^52 > | subsd xmm1, xmm3 > | orpd xmm1, xmm2 // Merge sign bit back in. > + | sseconst_1 xmm3, RD > | .if mode == 1 // ceil(x)? > - | sseconst_m1 xmm2, RD // Must subtract -1 to preserve -0. > | cmpsd xmm0, xmm1, 6 // x > result? > + | andpd xmm0, xmm3 > + | addsd xmm1, xmm0 // If yes, add 1. > + | orpd xmm1, xmm2 // Merge sign bit back in (again). > | .else // floor(x)? > - | sseconst_1 xmm2, RD > | cmpsd xmm0, xmm1, 1 // x < result? > + | andpd xmm0, xmm3 > + | subsd xmm1, xmm0 // If yes, subtract 1. > | .endif > - | andpd xmm0, xmm2 > - | subsd xmm1, xmm0 // If yes, subtract +-1. > |.endif > | movaps xmm0, xmm1 > |1: > diff --git a/src/vm_x86.dasc b/src/vm_x86.dasc > index 9fa9a3f7..05a8267b 100644 > --- a/src/vm_x86.dasc > +++ b/src/vm_x86.dasc > @@ -533,9 +533,6 @@ > |.macro sseconst_1, reg, tmp // Synthesize 1.0. > | sseconst_hi reg, tmp, 3ff00000 > |.endmacro > -|.macro sseconst_m1, reg, tmp // Synthesize -1.0. > -| sseconst_hi reg, tmp, bff00000 > -|.endmacro > |.macro sseconst_2p52, reg, tmp // Synthesize 2^52. > | sseconst_hi reg, tmp, 43300000 > |.endmacro > @@ -3089,15 +3086,17 @@ static void build_subroutines(BuildCtx *ctx) > | addsd xmm1, xmm3 // (|x| + 2^52) - 2^52 > | subsd xmm1, xmm3 > | orpd xmm1, xmm2 // Merge sign bit back in. > + | sseconst_1 xmm3, RDa > | .if mode == 1 // ceil(x)? > - | sseconst_m1 xmm2, RDa // Must subtract -1 to preserve -0. > | cmpsd xmm0, xmm1, 6 // x > result? > + | andpd xmm0, xmm3 > + | addsd xmm1, xmm0 // If yes, add 1. > + | orpd xmm1, xmm2 // Merge sign bit back in (again). > | .else // floor(x)? > - | sseconst_1 xmm2, RDa > | cmpsd xmm0, xmm1, 1 // x < result? > + | andpd xmm0, xmm3 > + | subsd xmm1, xmm0 // If yes, subtract 1. > | .endif > - | andpd xmm0, xmm2 > - | subsd xmm1, xmm0 // If yes, subtract +-1. > |.endif > | movaps xmm0, xmm1 > |1: > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-859-math-ceil-sign.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-859-math-ceil-sign.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..df0ca329 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-859-math-ceil-sign.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > +local tap = require('tap') > + > +-- Test file to demonstrate the incorrect LuaJIT's behaviour > +-- for `math.ceil(x)` when argument `x`: -1 < x < -0.5. > +-- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/859. > + > +local test = tap.test('lj-859-math-ceil-sign') > + > +test:plan(1) > + > +local IS_DUALNUM = tostring(tonumber('-0')) ~= tostring(-0) > +local IS_X86_64 = jit.arch == 'x86' or jit.arch == 'x64' > + > +-- Use `tostirng()` to compare sign of the returned value. Typo: s/sign/the sign/ > +-- Take any value from the mentioned range. Chosen one is Typo: s/Chosen/The chosen/ > +-- mentioned in the commit message. > +test:ok((IS_DUALNUM and IS_X86_64) or tostring(math.ceil(-0.9)) == '-0', Nit: maybe we should precalculate the predicate before the `test:ok` call? Or, at least the `IS_DUALNUM and IS_X86_64`, as it is essentially a skipcond. > + 'correct zero sign') > + > +test:done(true) > -- > 2.42.0 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-07 9:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-11-02 12:36 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-11-07 9:44 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2023-11-07 10:21 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-11-07 10:50 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-11-09 13:26 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2023-11-09 14:32 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-11-09 16:04 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2023-11-23 6:31 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ejcjnahaocbxsy3gjd6ksxkrovhkxe5a4l7pbh3e2qgc2fvzwr@gvxwyxc3d63q \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] x86/x64: Fix math.ceil(-0.9) result sign.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox