Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>,
	Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 05/25] test: enable <ffi_call.lua> in LuaJIT-tests
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 12:32:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea276cc9-4bcb-4cd2-83fd-a94096e3bf18@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6785a95ee05ea262eff6226bc7867c9280ea37ea.1705661401.git.skaplun@tarantool.org>

Hi, Sergey!

thanks for the patch!

please take a look on my comments


Sergey

On 1/19/24 14:32, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> This patch removes unused `dofile()`. Also, it uses the basename of the
> ctest library to be loaded via ffi. It adds groups with names of
> subtests and enables the test in <index>. Complex type is undefined on
> Windows, so the correponding tests are not enabled for this platform.
> Fastcalls are enabled only for the x86 architecture. Stdcalls are
> enabled only for Windows on x86. Tests with calls with 10 arguments with
> sizes less than 8 bits are dummy for M1. This suite lacks a mechanism to
> skip subtests satisfying complicated conditions, so it is done manually
> by the corresponding `if` check.
>
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#9398
> ---
>   test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/ffi_call.lua | 180 +++++++++++++------------
>   test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/index        |   1 +
>   2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/ffi_call.lua b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/ffi_call.lua
> index 1eb5e906..c362f3e0 100644
> --- a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/ffi_call.lua
> +++ b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/ffi_call.lua
> @@ -1,8 +1,5 @@
> -
>   local ffi = require("ffi")
>   
> -dofile("../common/ffi_util.inc")
> -
>   local tonumber = tonumber
>   
>   ffi.cdef[[
> @@ -73,81 +70,87 @@ double __stdcall stdcall_dd(double a, double b);
>   float __stdcall stdcall_ff(float a, float b);
>   ]]
>   
> -local C = ffi.load("../clib/ctest")
> +local C = ffi.load("ctest")
>   
> -assert(C.call_i(-42) == -41)
> -assert(C.call_ii(-42, 17) == -42+17)
> -assert(C.call_10i(-42, 17, 12345, 9987, -100, 11, 51, 0x12345678, 338, -78901234) == -42+17+12345+9987-100+11+51+0x12345678+338-78901234)
> +do --- call int enum double float args
> +  assert(C.call_i(-42) == -41)
> +  assert(C.call_ii(-42, 17) == -42+17)
>   
> -assert(C.call_ie(123) == 124)
> +  assert(C.call_ie(123) == 124)
>   
> -assert(tonumber(C.call_ji(0x123456789LL, -17)) == tonumber(0x123456789LL-17))
> -assert(tonumber(C.call_ij(-17, 0x123456789LL)) == tonumber(0x123456789LL-17))
> -assert(tonumber(C.call_jj(-42, 17)) == -42+17)
> -assert(tonumber(C.call_jj(0x123456789abcdef0LL, -0x789abcde99887766LL)) == tonumber(0x123456789abcdef0LL-0x789abcde99887766LL))
> +  assert(tonumber(C.call_ji(0x123456789LL, -17)) == tonumber(0x123456789LL-17))
> +  assert(tonumber(C.call_ij(-17, 0x123456789LL)) == tonumber(0x123456789LL-17))
> +  assert(tonumber(C.call_jj(-42, 17)) == -42+17)
> +  assert(tonumber(C.call_jj(0x123456789abcdef0LL, -0x789abcde99887766LL)) == tonumber(0x123456789abcdef0LL-0x789abcde99887766LL))
>   
> -assert(C.call_dd(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
> -assert(C.call_10d(-42.5, 17.125, 12345.5, 9987, -100.625, 11, 51, 0x12345678, 338, -78901234.75) == -42.5+17.125+12345.5+9987-100.625+11+51+0x12345678+338-78901234.75)
> +  assert(C.call_dd(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
>   
> -assert(C.call_ff(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
> -assert(C.call_10f(-42.5, 17.125, 12345.5, 9987, -100.625, 11, 51, 0x123456, 338, -789012.75) == -42.5+17.125+12345.5+9987-100.625+11+51+0x123456+338-789012.75)
> +  assert(C.call_ff(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
>   
> -assert(C.call_idifjd(-42, 17.125, 0x12345, -100.625, 12345678901234, -789012.75) == -42+17.125+0x12345-100.625+12345678901234-789012.75)
> +  assert(C.call_idifjd(-42, 17.125, 0x12345, -100.625, 12345678901234, -789012.75) == -42+17.125+0x12345-100.625+12345678901234-789012.75)
> +end
> +
> +do --- call 10 args
> +  if not (jit.os == "OSX" and jit.arch == "arm64") then -- NYI
> +    assert(C.call_10i(-42, 17, 12345, 9987, -100, 11, 51, 0x12345678, 338, -78901234) == -42+17+12345+9987-100+11+51+0x12345678+338-78901234)

these tests totally unreadable.

I would rewrite such tests in the following manner:

local args = {-42, 17, 12345, 9987, -100, 11, 51, 0x12345678, 338, 
-78901234}

assert(C.call_10i(unpack(args)) == sum(args))

where `sum` is a function that sum elements in a passed table.

(Or even calculate RHS once and use it and doesn't depend on 
calculations in runtime.)

Same comment for other similar tests.


> +    assert(C.call_10f(-42.5, 17.125, 12345.5, 9987, -100.625, 11, 51, 0x123456, 338, -789012.75) == -42.5+17.125+12345.5+9987-100.625+11+51+0x123456+338-789012.75)
> +  end
> +  assert(C.call_10d(-42.5, 17.125, 12345.5, 9987, -100.625, 11, 51, 0x12345678, 338, -78901234.75) == -42.5+17.125+12345.5+9987-100.625+11+51+0x12345678+338-78901234.75)
> +end
>   
> -do
> +do --- call pointer arg
>     local a = ffi.new("int[10]", -42)
>     assert(C.call_p_i(a) == -42+1)
>     assert(tonumber(ffi.cast("intptr_t", C.call_p_p(a+3))) == tonumber(ffi.cast("intptr_t", a+4)))
>     assert(C.call_pp_i(a+8, a+5) == 3)
>   end
>   
> --- vararg
> -assert(C.call_ividi(-42, ffi.new("int", 17), 12.5, ffi.new("int", 131)) == -42+17+12.5+131)
> +do --- vararg
> +  assert(C.call_ividi(-42, ffi.new("int", 17), 12.5, ffi.new("int", 131)) == -42+17+12.5+131)
> +end
>   
>   -- complex
> -if pcall(function() return C.call_dd_cd end) then
> -  do
> -    local c = C.call_dd_cd(12.5, -3.25)
> -    assert(c.re == 12.5 and c.im == -3.25*2)
> -  end
> -  do
> -    local c1 = ffi.new("complex", 12.5, -3.25)
> -    local cz = C.call_cd(c1)
> -    assert(cz.re == 12.5+1 and cz.im == -3.25-2)
> -  end
> -  do
> -    local c1 = ffi.new("complex", 12.5, -3.25)
> -    local c2 = ffi.new("complex", -17.125, 100.625)
> -    local cz = C.call_cdcd(c1, c2)
> -    assert(cz.re == 12.5-17.125 and cz.im == -3.25+100.625)
> -  end
> +do --- dd_cd -windows
> +  local c = C.call_dd_cd(12.5, -3.25)
> +  assert(c.re == 12.5 and c.im == -3.25*2)
> +end
> +do --- cd -windows
> +  local c1 = ffi.new("complex", 12.5, -3.25)
> +  local cz = C.call_cd(c1)
> +  assert(cz.re == 12.5+1 and cz.im == -3.25-2)
> +end
> +do --- cdcd -windows
> +  local c1 = ffi.new("complex", 12.5, -3.25)
> +  local c2 = ffi.new("complex", -17.125, 100.625)
> +  local cz = C.call_cdcd(c1, c2)
> +  assert(cz.re == 12.5-17.125 and cz.im == -3.25+100.625)
> +end
>   
> -  do
> -    local c = C.call_ff_cf(12.5, -3.25)
> -    assert(c.re == 12.5 and c.im == -3.25*2)
> -  end
> -  do
> -    local c1 = ffi.new("complex float", 12.5, -3.25)
> -    local cz = C.call_cf(c1)
> -    assert(cz.re == 12.5+1 and cz.im == -3.25-2)
> -  end
> -  do
> -    local c1 = ffi.new("complex float", 12.5, -3.25)
> -    local c2 = ffi.new("complex float", -17.125, 100.625)
> -    local cz = C.call_cfcf(c1, c2)
> -    assert(cz.re == 12.5-17.125 and cz.im == -3.25+100.625)
> -  end
> +do --- ff_cf -windows
> +  local c = C.call_ff_cf(12.5, -3.25)
> +  assert(c.re == 12.5 and c.im == -3.25*2)
> +end
> +do --- cf -windows
> +  local c1 = ffi.new("complex float", 12.5, -3.25)
> +  local cz = C.call_cf(c1)
> +  assert(cz.re == 12.5+1 and cz.im == -3.25-2)
> +end
> +do --- cfcf -windows
> +  local c1 = ffi.new("complex float", 12.5, -3.25)
> +  local c2 = ffi.new("complex float", -17.125, 100.625)
> +  local cz = C.call_cfcf(c1, c2)
> +  assert(cz.re == 12.5-17.125 and cz.im == -3.25+100.625)
>   end
>   
>   -- structs
> -do
> +do --- s_ii
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_ii", -42, 17)
>     local sz = C.call_sii(s1)
>     assert(s1.x == -42 and s1.y == 17)
>     assert(sz.x == -42 and sz.y == 17)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_jj
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_jj", 0x123456789abcdef0LL, -0x789abcde99887766LL)
>     local sz = C.call_sjj(s1)
>     assert(s1.x == 0x123456789abcdef0LL)
> @@ -156,28 +159,28 @@ do
>     assert(sz.y == -0x789abcde99887766LL)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_ff
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_ff", 12.5, -3.25)
>     local sz = C.call_sff(s1)
>     assert(s1.x == 12.5 and s1.y == -3.25)
>     assert(sz.x == 12.5 and sz.y == -3.25)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_dd
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_dd", 12.5, -3.25)
>     local sz = C.call_sdd(s1)
>     assert(s1.x == 12.5 and s1.y == -3.25)
>     assert(sz.x == 12.5 and sz.y == -3.25)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_8i
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_8i", -42, 17, 12345, 9987, -100, 11, 51, 0x12345678)
>     local sz = C.call_s8i(s1)
>     assert(s1.a+s1.b+s1.c+s1.d+s1.e+s1.f+s1.g+s1.h == -42+17+12345+9987-100+11+51+0x12345678)
>     assert(sz.a+sz.b+sz.c+sz.d+sz.e+sz.f+sz.g+sz.h == -42+17+12345+9987-100+11+51+0x12345678)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_ii s_ii
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_ii", -42, 17)
>     local s2 = ffi.new("s_ii", 0x12345, -98765)
>     local sz = C.call_siisii(s1, s2)
> @@ -186,7 +189,7 @@ do
>     assert(sz.x == -42+0x12345 and sz.y == 17-98765)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_ff s_ff
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_ff", 12.5, -3.25)
>     local s2 = ffi.new("s_ff", -17.125, 100.625)
>     local sz = C.call_sffsff(s1, s2)
> @@ -195,7 +198,7 @@ do
>     assert(sz.x == 12.5-17.125 and sz.y == -3.25+100.625)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_dd s_dd
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_dd", 12.5, -3.25)
>     local s2 = ffi.new("s_dd", -17.125, 100.625)
>     local sz = C.call_sddsdd(s1, s2)
> @@ -204,7 +207,7 @@ do
>     assert(sz.x == 12.5-17.125 and sz.y == -3.25+100.625)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- s_8i s_8i
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_8i", -42, 17, 12345, 9987, -100, 11, 51, 0x12345678)
>     local s2 = ffi.new("s_8i", 99, 311, 98765, -51, 312, 97, 17, 0x44332211)
>     local sz = C.call_s8is8i(s1, s2)
> @@ -215,7 +218,7 @@ do
>     assert(sz.h == 0x12345678+0x44332211)
>   end
>   
> -do
> +do --- is8ii
>     local s1 = ffi.new("s_8i", -42, 17, 12345, 9987, -100, 11, 51, 0x12345678)
>     local sz = C.call_is8ii(19, s1, -51)
>     assert(s1.a+s1.b+s1.c+s1.d+s1.e+s1.f+s1.g+s1.h == -42+17+12345+9987-100+11+51+0x12345678)
> @@ -225,42 +228,41 @@ do
>   end
>   
>   -- target-specific
> -if jit.arch == "x86" then
> +do --- fastcall void int double +x86
>     assert(C.fastcall_void() == 1)
>     assert(C.fastcall_i(-42) == -41)
>     assert(C.fastcall_ii(-42, 17) == -42+17)
>     assert(C.fastcall_iii(-42, 17, 139) == -42+17+139)
>     assert(tonumber(C.fastcall_ji(0x123456789LL, -17)) == tonumber(0x123456789LL-17))
>     assert(C.fastcall_dd(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
> +end
>   
> -  do
> -    local a = ffi.new("int[10]", -42)
> -    assert(C.fastcall_pp_i(a+8, a+5) == 3)
> -  end
> -
> -  do
> -    local s1 = ffi.new("s_ii", -42, 17)
> -    local s2 = ffi.new("s_ii", 0x12345, -98765)
> -    local sz = C.fastcall_siisii(s1, s2)
> -    assert(s1.x == -42 and s1.y == 17)
> -    assert(s2.x == 0x12345 and s2.y == -98765)
> -    assert(sz.x == -42+0x12345 and sz.y == 17-98765)
> -  end
> +do --- fastcall pp_i +x86
> +  local a = ffi.new("int[10]", -42)
> +  assert(C.fastcall_pp_i(a+8, a+5) == 3)
> +end
>   
> -  do
> -    local s1 = ffi.new("s_dd", 12.5, -3.25)
> -    local s2 = ffi.new("s_dd", -17.125, 100.625)
> -    local sz = C.fastcall_sddsdd(s1, s2)
> -    assert(s1.x == 12.5 and s1.y == -3.25)
> -    assert(s2.x == -17.125 and s2.y == 100.625)
> -    assert(sz.x == 12.5-17.125 and sz.y == -3.25+100.625)
> -  end
> +do --- fastcall s_ii s_ii +x86
> +  local s1 = ffi.new("s_ii", -42, 17)
> +  local s2 = ffi.new("s_ii", 0x12345, -98765)
> +  local sz = C.fastcall_siisii(s1, s2)
> +  assert(s1.x == -42 and s1.y == 17)
> +  assert(s2.x == 0x12345 and s2.y == -98765)
> +  assert(sz.x == -42+0x12345 and sz.y == 17-98765)
> +end
>   
> -  if jit.os == "Windows" then
> -    assert(C.stdcall_i(-42) == -41)
> -    assert(C.stdcall_ii(-42, 17) == -42+17)
> -    assert(C.stdcall_dd(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
> -    assert(C.stdcall_ff(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
> -  end
> +do --- fastcall s_dd s_dd +x86
> +  local s1 = ffi.new("s_dd", 12.5, -3.25)
> +  local s2 = ffi.new("s_dd", -17.125, 100.625)
> +  local sz = C.fastcall_sddsdd(s1, s2)
> +  assert(s1.x == 12.5 and s1.y == -3.25)
> +  assert(s2.x == -17.125 and s2.y == 100.625)
> +  assert(sz.x == 12.5-17.125 and sz.y == -3.25+100.625)
>   end
>   
> +do --- stdcall +x86 +windows
> +  assert(C.stdcall_i(-42) == -41)
> +  assert(C.stdcall_ii(-42, 17) == -42+17)
> +  assert(C.stdcall_dd(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
> +  assert(C.stdcall_ff(12.5, -3.25) == 12.5-3.25)
> +end
> diff --git a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/index b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/index
> index 8d833107..599a0182 100644
> --- a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/index
> +++ b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/ffi/index
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ copy_fill.lua
>   err.lua
>   ffi_arith_ptr.lua
>   ffi_bitfield.lua
> +ffi_call.lua
>   istype.lua
>   jit_array.lua
>   jit_complex.lua

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-23  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-19 11:32 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 00/25] More tests from LuaJIT-tests, part 1 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 01/25] test: prepare lauxilarily libs for LuaJIT-tests Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:10   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 02/25] test: separate LuaJIT helpers from ffi_util.inc Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:17   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 12:35     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 03/25] test: enable <ffi_arith_ptr.lua> in LuaJIT-tests Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:21   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 13:10     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 04/25] test: enable <ffi_bitfield.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 05/25] test: enable <ffi_call.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:32   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2024-01-23 12:46     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-24 11:05       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 06/25] test: enable <ffi_callback.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:36   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 12:01     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 12:58     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 07/25] test: enable <ffi_const.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:38   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 11:59     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 12:52       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 12:49     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 08/25] test: enable <ffi_convert.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:39   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23 12:51     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 09/25] test: enable <ffi_enum.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 10/25] test: enable <ffi_gcstep_recursive.lua> Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 11/25] test: enable <ffi_jit_arith.lua> in LuaJIT-tests Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 12/25] test: enable <ffi_jit_call.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-24 14:43   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 13/25] test: enable <ffi_jit_conv.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 14/25] test: enable <ffi_lex_number.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 15/25] test: enable <ffi_metatype.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 16/25] test: enable <ffi_new.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 17/25] test: enable <ffi_parse_array.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 18/25] test: enable <ffi_parse_basic.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 19/25] test: enable <ffi_parse_cdef.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 20/25] test: enable <ffi_parse_struct.lua> LuaJIT test Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 21/25] test: enable <ffi_tabov.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 22/25] test: enable <lightud.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 23/25] test: enable <api_call.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 24/25] test: enable <catch_wrap.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-19 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 25/25] test: enable <catch_cpp.lua> " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-23  9:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 00/25] More tests from LuaJIT-tests, part 1 Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ea276cc9-4bcb-4cd2-83fd-a94096e3bf18@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 05/25] test: enable <ffi_call.lua> in LuaJIT-tests' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox