From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org,
Roman Khabibov <roman.habibov@tarantool.org>
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] box: fix bug with module_reload() without box.cfg{}
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:41:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8cdfb5b-866f-64b7-d8d5-878642323449@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190205001737.8475-1-roman.habibov@tarantool.org>
Hi! Thanks for the patch! See 5 comments below.
On 05/02/2019 01:17, Roman Khabibov wrote:
> Fix bug with segfault when use module_reload() before box.cfg{}.
1. Instead of duplicating commit title, it is usually
better to describe here a reason why the bug existed.
>
> Closes #3770
>
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/romanhabibov/gh-3770-module-reload
> Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3770
2. Please, put branch and issue links after '---'.
> ---
Here.
> src/box/func.c | 3 +++
> test/box/func_reload.result | 9 +++++++++
> test/box/func_reload.test.lua | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/box/func.c b/src/box/func.c
> index a817851fd..ee6dd55dc 100644
> --- a/src/box/func.c
> +++ b/src/box/func.c
> @@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ module_sym(struct module *module, const char *name)
> int
> module_reload(const char *package, const char *package_end, struct module **module)
> {
> + if (!modules)
> + return -1;
3. As you know, we use == NULL instead of ! when dealing with pointers.
4. Instead of checking for modules != NULL in each public func.h function,
it is better to move module_init() call from box_cfg_xc() to box_init(). Then
main() will create modules hash.
> +
> struct module *old_module = module_cache_find(package, package_end);
> if (old_module == NULL) {
> /* Module wasn't loaded - do nothing. */
> diff --git a/test/box/func_reload.test.lua b/test/box/func_reload.test.lua
> index 8906898ec..00fe8cf48 100644
> --- a/test/box/func_reload.test.lua
> +++ b/test/box/func_reload.test.lua
> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
> +-- gh-3770 Check no segfault with module_reload() without box.cfg{}.
> +
> +box.internal.module_reload('')
> +box.internal.module_reload('xxx')
5. Not-tap tests are always run with already called box.cfg(),
so these lines here will work regardless of your patch. Please,
move it to a tap test, in app-tap directory. Now I do not see
there any existing and suitable file for this test, so you
should create a new one. For example, app-tap/func.test.lua.
> +
> fio = require('fio')
> net = require('net.box')
> fiber = require('fiber')
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-05 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-05 0:17 [tarantool-patches] " Roman Khabibov
2019-02-05 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2019-02-07 11:31 ` [tarantool-patches] " Roman
2019-02-15 13:28 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-15 14:58 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8cdfb5b-866f-64b7-d8d5-878642323449@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=roman.habibov@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] box: fix bug with module_reload() without box.cfg{}' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox