From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Roman Khabibov <roman.habibov@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] box: fix bug with module_reload() without box.cfg{} Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:41:53 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <d8cdfb5b-866f-64b7-d8d5-878642323449@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190205001737.8475-1-roman.habibov@tarantool.org> Hi! Thanks for the patch! See 5 comments below. On 05/02/2019 01:17, Roman Khabibov wrote: > Fix bug with segfault when use module_reload() before box.cfg{}. 1. Instead of duplicating commit title, it is usually better to describe here a reason why the bug existed. > > Closes #3770 > > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/romanhabibov/gh-3770-module-reload > Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3770 2. Please, put branch and issue links after '---'. > --- Here. > src/box/func.c | 3 +++ > test/box/func_reload.result | 9 +++++++++ > test/box/func_reload.test.lua | 5 +++++ > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/box/func.c b/src/box/func.c > index a817851fd..ee6dd55dc 100644 > --- a/src/box/func.c > +++ b/src/box/func.c > @@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ module_sym(struct module *module, const char *name) > int > module_reload(const char *package, const char *package_end, struct module **module) > { > + if (!modules) > + return -1; 3. As you know, we use == NULL instead of ! when dealing with pointers. 4. Instead of checking for modules != NULL in each public func.h function, it is better to move module_init() call from box_cfg_xc() to box_init(). Then main() will create modules hash. > + > struct module *old_module = module_cache_find(package, package_end); > if (old_module == NULL) { > /* Module wasn't loaded - do nothing. */ > diff --git a/test/box/func_reload.test.lua b/test/box/func_reload.test.lua > index 8906898ec..00fe8cf48 100644 > --- a/test/box/func_reload.test.lua > +++ b/test/box/func_reload.test.lua > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ > +-- gh-3770 Check no segfault with module_reload() without box.cfg{}. > + > +box.internal.module_reload('') > +box.internal.module_reload('xxx') 5. Not-tap tests are always run with already called box.cfg(), so these lines here will work regardless of your patch. Please, move it to a tap test, in app-tap directory. Now I do not see there any existing and suitable file for this test, so you should create a new one. For example, app-tap/func.test.lua. > + > fio = require('fio') > net = require('net.box') > fiber = require('fiber') > -- > 2.17.1 > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-05 15:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-02-05 0:17 [tarantool-patches] " Roman Khabibov 2019-02-05 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message] 2019-02-07 11:31 ` [tarantool-patches] " Roman 2019-02-15 13:28 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-15 14:58 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=d8cdfb5b-866f-64b7-d8d5-878642323449@tarantool.org \ --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --cc=roman.habibov@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH] box: fix bug with module_reload() without box.cfg{}' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox