Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] box: fail in box_check_config() on bad sql cache size
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:17:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7bd35b4-7eb6-6ee1-814c-b165705c03a5@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305210029.GA12214@tarantool.org>



On 05/03/2020 22:00, Nikita Pettik wrote:
> On 05 Mar 21:53, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
>> Hi! Thanks for the review!
>>
>> On 05/03/2020 12:35, Nikita Pettik wrote:
>>> On 05 Mar 01:14, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
>>>> It was calling box_check_sql_cache_size() assuming that it
>>>> throws. But it returns 0/-1.
>>>> ---
>>>>  src/box/box.cc | 3 ++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/box/box.cc b/src/box/box.cc
>>>> index 09dd67ab4..0212f34ad 100644
>>>> --- a/src/box/box.cc
>>>> +++ b/src/box/box.cc
>>>> @@ -669,7 +669,8 @@ box_check_config()
>>>>  	box_check_memtx_memory(cfg_geti64("memtx_memory"));
>>>>  	box_check_memtx_min_tuple_size(cfg_geti64("memtx_min_tuple_size"));
>>>>  	box_check_vinyl_options();
>>>> -	box_check_sql_cache_size(cfg_geti("sql_cache_size"));
>>>> +	if (box_check_sql_cache_size(cfg_geti("sql_cache_size")) != 0)
>>>> +		diag_raise();
>>>>  }
>>>
>>> Is it possible to test this scenario: box.sql_cache_size is set to
>>> incorrect value but box.internal:cfg_check() doesn't verify it?
>>> I mean supply this patch with test case. If it turns out to be
>>> too complicated, then nevermind. LGTM otherwise.
>>
>> It is not testable. Sql_cache_size is always set from
>> box_set_prepared_stmt_cache_size(), on first and all
>> next configurations, and is always checked for returned
>> value.
> 
> Ok, then mb it would be better to check rc in assertion
> instead of diag_raise().. (since it can't fail here anyway)?
> 

It can fail in box_check_config(). But the error won't be different
from checking it later during set.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-05 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05  0:14 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] box.cfg() check memtx/vinyl_memory Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05  0:14 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] box: fail in box_check_config() on bad sql cache size Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 11:35   ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-05 20:53     ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 21:00       ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-05 21:17         ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2020-03-19 15:27   ` Igor Munkin
2020-03-20  0:11     ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05  0:14 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/2] box: on cfg properly check memory quota Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-05 11:41   ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-20 13:56 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] box.cfg() check memtx/vinyl_memory Nikita Pettik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7bd35b4-7eb6-6ee1-814c-b165705c03a5@tarantool.org \
    --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --cc=korablev@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] box: fail in box_check_config() on bad sql cache size' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox