From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, gorcunov@gmail.com,
sergepetrenko@tarantool.org, korablev@tarantool.org
Subject: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH msgpuck 0/2] MP_EXT virtual serializer
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 01:46:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1589240001.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> (raw)
The patchset makes MP_EXT serializer for mp_snprint() and
mp_fprint() functions virtual.
The patch implements one possible solution - return recursion
instead of mp_stack into the printers, and make external code
overload both mp_fprint() and mp_snprint(). The most
straightforward solution.
However it is possible to avoid overloading both mp_fprint() and
mp_snprint(). Instead, msgpuck could expose just one virtual
method, which takes an opaque object with method print() having
signature like snprintf() and fprintf() - format and arguments.
mp_snprint() would create that opaque object's print() method as
snprintf(). While mp_fprint() would create this object's print()
method as fprintf(). Drawback of the solution - ton of virtual
calls, because serializers tend to call print() a lot, on small
strings like ':', ', ', and so on. On the other hand, this should
simplify code in Tarantool, especially MP_ERROR serializer, where
code duplication was so big for mp_snprint_error() and
mp_fprint_error(), that I invented some kind of C template for it.
With one virtual method, which accepts a virtual object it would
be just one mp_print_error().
I decided to leave the final decision to a review discussion.
Should we keep it like it is done now, or make it even more
virtual like I described above, or probably there are other ideas.
Branch: http://github.com/tarantool/msgpuck/tree/gerold103/mp_print_ext
Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4719
Vladislav Shpilevoy (2):
Return recursion to mp_snprint() and mp_fprint()
Make MP_EXT mp_snprint() and mp_fprint() customizable
msgpuck.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
msgpuck.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++
test/msgpuck.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
--
2.21.1 (Apple Git-122.3)
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-11 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 23:46 Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2020-05-11 23:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH msgpuck 1/2] Return recursion to mp_snprint() and mp_fprint() Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-11 23:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH msgpuck 2/2] Make MP_EXT mp_snprint() and mp_fprint() customizable Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-19 20:48 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-14 21:26 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH msgpuck 1.5/2] Provide more details at MP_EXT mp_fprint/snprint() Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-19 12:14 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-05-19 20:48 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-05-18 15:18 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH msgpuck 0/2] MP_EXT virtual serializer Serge Petrenko
2020-05-19 9:10 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-05-21 18:23 ` Alexander Turenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1589240001.git.v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH msgpuck 0/2] MP_EXT virtual serializer' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox