Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imeev Mergen <imeevma@tarantool.org>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/1] sql: do not change order of inserted values
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:21:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf08c4da-3870-092d-2dfe-eb16443fa18e@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3cd0b73-d7f7-e6ff-d648-bce82964059a@tarantool.org>


On 4/12/20 5:02 PM, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
>>>> --- a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
>>>> +++ b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
>>>> @@ -2694,23 +2694,10 @@ case OP_Column: {
>>>>            pC->cacheStatus = p->cacheCtr;
>>>>        }
>>>>        enum field_type field_type = field_type_MAX;
>>>> -    if (pC->eCurType == CURTYPE_TARANTOOL) {
>>>> -        /*
>>>> -         * Ephemeral spaces feature only one index
>>>> -         * covering all fields, but ephemeral spaces
>>>> -         * lack format. So, we can fetch type from
>>>> -         * key parts.
>>>> -         */
>>>> -        if (pC->uc.pCursor->curFlags & BTCF_TEphemCursor) {
>>>> -            field_type = pC->uc.pCursor->index->def->
>>>> -                    key_def->parts[p2].type;
>>>> -        } else if (pC->uc.pCursor->curFlags & BTCF_TaCursor) {
>>>> -            field_type = pC->uc.pCursor->space->def->
>>>> -                    fields[p2].type;
>>>> -        }
>>>> -    } else if (pC->eCurType == CURTYPE_SORTER) {
>>>> +    if (pC->eCurType == CURTYPE_TARANTOOL)
>>>> +        field_type = pC->uc.pCursor->space->def->fields[p2].type;
>>>> +    else if (pC->eCurType == CURTYPE_SORTER)
>>>>            field_type = vdbe_sorter_get_field_type(pC->uc.pSorter, p2);
>>>> -    }
>>>>        struct Mem *default_val_mem =
>>>>            pOp->p4type == P4_MEM ? pOp->p4.pMem : NULL;
>>>>        if (vdbe_field_ref_fetch(&pC->field_ref, p2, pDest) != 0)
>>> Shouldn't this be a part of the previous commit, which
>>> introduces the ephemeral space format?
>> They should, along with 3962. But, they have different milistones,
>> I wasn't sure that it is right to put all three tickets in one
>> patch-set.
> But they already depend on each other. So what is a problem?
True. Should I resend the patch-set?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-12 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-02 10:45 imeevma
2020-04-06 21:42 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-10  9:49   ` Mergen Imeev
2020-04-11 14:34     ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-12 10:21       ` Imeev Mergen
2020-04-12 14:02         ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-12 15:21           ` Imeev Mergen [this message]
2020-04-12 16:00             ` Vladislav Shpilevoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf08c4da-3870-092d-2dfe-eb16443fa18e@tarantool.org \
    --to=imeevma@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/1] sql: do not change order of inserted values' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox