From: Olga Arkhangelskaia <arkholga@tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] cmake: add LTO support for building luajit
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 18:00:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbb50299-cb85-7cd3-d238-c1bf3b29090d@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525125827.GA20107@pony.bronevichok.ru>
Hello Sergey!
Thanks for review and testing.
However, -DENABLE_LTO=ON is not set by default, yu have to set it.
I followed your way:
cmake . -DCMAKE_LINKER=/usr/bin/ld.gold -DENABLE_LTO=ON
-- ld version string: GNU ld version 2.30-58.el8_1.2
-- Found ld.bfd version: 2.30
CMake Error at cmake/lto.cmake:79 (message):
ld.bfd >= 2.31 is needed for LTO
Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:68 (include)
As far as I understand there gold/bfd is the frontend to binutils, so it
is impossible om msc.
I did the same at the debian docker container:
Generating third_party/luajit/src/libluajit.a
cd /tarantool/third_party/luajit && make BUILDMODE=static
HOST_CC="/usr/bin/cc" TARGET_CC="/usr/bin/cc"
TARGET_CFLAGS="-fexceptions -funwind-tables -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-fno-stack-protector -fno-common -fopenmp -msse2
-Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-tautological-compare
-Wno-misleading-indentation -Wno-varargs -Wno-implicit-fallthrough -flto
-fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects" TARGET_LD="/usr/bin/ld"
TARGET_LDFLAGS=" -Wno-lto-type-mismatch" TARGET_AR="gcc-ar rcus"
TARGET_STRIP="/usr/bin/strip" TARGET_SYS="Linux" CCOPT="-O2" CCDEBUG=""
XCFLAGS="-D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND
-DNVALGRIND=1 -DLUAJIT_ENABLE_PAIRSMM=1 -DLUAJIT_SMART_STRINGS=1" Q=''
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET="" clean
So the -flto is passet to luajit.
I will check formatting once again.
25.05.2020 15:58, Sergey Bronnikov пишет:
> Olya,
>
> I have reviewed patch in a branch and below my comments.
>
> formatting issues still exist:
>
> + if (CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_CLANG)
> + if (${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 3.9)
> + set (luajit_cflags ${luajit_cflags} -flto=full)
> + else()
> + # ThinLTO that is both scalable and incremental
> + # due to parallel IPO, available since 3.9 and above.
> + # See http://blog.llvm.org/2016/06/thinlto-scalable-and-incremental-lto.html
> + set (luajit_cflags ${luajit_cflags} -flto=thin)
> + endif()
> + # XCode linker dynamically load libLTO.dylib to perform
> + # link-time optimization.
> + # http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2009-November/027103.html
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> + if (NOT TARGET_OS_DARWIN)
> + # llvm-ar is just a wrapper over ar to pass --plugin= option,
> + # so that ar can understand LTO objects.
> + # See https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/122018.html
> + set (CMAKE_AR llvm-ar)
> + endif()
> + else()
> + # GNU opts to support lto
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> + # Due to some problems (bugs, slow work, etc) we support LTO
> + # only for 5.0+. The same is for binutils prior to 2.27
> + # See comments in scripts/Makefile.lto in scope of
>
>
> + # the patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10078207/
> + if (NOT ${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 5.0
> + AND NOT ${linker_version} VERSION_LESS 2.27)
> + set (luajit_cflags ${luajit_cflags} -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects)
> + endif()
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> + # gcc-ar is just a wrapper over ar to pass --plugin option
>
> Unfortunatlely I have no minimal required version of binutils on my system
> and I tested patch with ld gold (cmake -DCMAKE_LINKER=/usr/bin/ld.gold ..),
> as Timur Safin advised.
>
> How I tested:
> $ mkdir build; cd build
> $ make build_bundled_libs VERBOSE=1 2>&1 | tee log.txt
>
> with commands above output in log.txt doesn't contain LTO related options
> in compilation lines for luajit.
>
> gcc 8.3.1, clang 8.0.1, CentOS 8.1.1911
>
> Sergey
>
> On 17:33 Tue 14 Apr , Olga Arkhangelskaia wrote:
>> Fixed tabs:
>>
>> + # Depending of compiler we need to set appropriate llvm/gcc-ar
>> lib
>> + # llvm/gcc -ar is just a wrapper over ar to pass --plugin=
>> option,
>> + # so that ar can understand LTO objects.
>>
>> 14.04.2020 12:18, Igor Munkin пишет:
>>> Olya,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch! I left several comments below, please consider
>>> them.
>>>
>>> On 12.03.20, Olga Arkhangelskaia wrote:
>>>> Tarantool has LTO support, however while building luajit this opt. was
>>>> omitted. Patch adds necessary flag to turn it on.
>>>>
>>>> Minimum compiler/linker versions: clang 3.4, gcc 5.0+, ld 2.27+.
>>>>
>>>> Closes #3743
>>>> ---
>>>> Branch: OKriw/gh-3743-LuaJIT-does-not-use-LTO-with-DENABLE_LTO=ON-full-ci
>>>> cmake/lto.cmake | 3 ++-
>>>> cmake/luajit.cmake | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/cmake/lto.cmake b/cmake/lto.cmake
>>>> index 95ade75f4..9f29f3324 100644
>>>> --- a/cmake/lto.cmake
>>>> +++ b/cmake/lto.cmake
>>>> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ if (NOT TARGET_OS_DARWIN)
>>>> if (linker_version VERSION_LESS "2.31")
>>>> message(FATAL_ERROR "ld.bfd >= 2.31 is needed for LTO")
>>>> endif()
>>>> - elseif(matched_gold)
>>>> +
>>>> + elseif(matched_gold)
>>> Typo: there is a mess with whitespace above.
>>>
>>> However this chunk provides no changes except whitespace and newline.
>>> Please drop it.
>>>
>>>> set(linker_version ${CMAKE_MATCH_1})
>>>> message(STATUS "Found ld.gold version: ${linker_version}")
>>>> diff --git a/cmake/luajit.cmake b/cmake/luajit.cmake
>>>> index 072db8269..da1b4926d 100644
>>>> --- a/cmake/luajit.cmake
>>>> +++ b/cmake/luajit.cmake
>>>> @@ -225,6 +225,32 @@ macro(luajit_build)
>>>> set(luajit_xcflags ${luajit_xcflags} -D${def})
>>>> endforeach()
>>>> + # Add LTO option to luajit
>>>> + if (CMAKE_INTERPROCEDURAL_OPTIMIZATION)
>>>> + message("Setting LTO flags for building luajit")
>>>> + # Clang opt to support LTO
>>>> + if (CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_CLANG AND
>>>> + NOT ${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 3.4)
>>> So, if clang toolchain is used but version is less than 3.4, then gcc
>>> toolchain settings are used. It's either totally wrong or definitely
>>> need to be clarified with a corresponding comment.
>>>
>>> Also, AFAICS LTO support for toolchain is checked via CheckIPOSupported
>>> CMake module. So additional check here looks to be excess or also need
>>> to be clarified.
>>>
>>>> + if (${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 3.9)
>>>> + set(luajit_cflags ${luajit_cflags} -flto=full)
>>>> + else()
>>>> + set(luajit_cflags ${luajit_cflags} -flto=full)
>>>> + endif()
>>> I see no difference in the branches above.
>>>
>>>> + if (NOT TARGET_OS_DARWIN)
>>>> + # Depending of compiler we need to set appropriate llvm/gcc-ar lib
>>>> + set (CMAKE_AR llvm-ar)
>>> What ar is used on systems different from Darwin based ones when clang
>>> toolchain is used?
>>>
>>>> + endif()
>>>> + # GNU opts to support lto
>>>> + else()
>>>> + #Due to some problems (bugs, slow work, etc) we support LTO only for 5.0+
>>>> + #The same is for binutils prior 2.27
>>>> + if (NOT ${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 5.0
>>>> + AND NOT ${linker_version} VERSION_LESS 2.27)
>>>> + set(luajit_cflags ${luajit_cflags} -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects)
>>>> + endif()
>>>> + set (CMAKE_AR gcc-ar)
>>> Could you please clarify why ar is set explicitly here?
>>>
>>>> + endif()
>>>> + endif()
>>> Typo: there is a mess with indent above. Unfortunately I failed to find
>>> our CMake style guide, so please adjust your changes considering the
>>> code nearby.
>>>
>>>> # Pass the same toolchain that is used for building of
>>>> # tarantool itself, because tools from different toolchains
>>>> # can be incompatible. A compiler and a linker are already set
>>>> --
>>>> 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-12 10:05 Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-03-12 10:10 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-04-14 9:18 ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-14 9:59 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-04-14 12:32 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-04-14 17:00 ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-15 13:22 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-04-17 11:47 ` Igor Munkin
2020-04-17 14:41 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-04-27 23:04 ` Igor Munkin
2020-05-06 10:47 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-04-14 14:33 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-05-25 12:58 ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-05-25 15:00 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia [this message]
2020-05-25 15:12 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-05-25 15:43 ` Sergey Bronnikov
2020-05-26 10:11 ` Igor Munkin
2020-05-27 10:01 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-06-16 1:02 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-06-16 11:36 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-06-16 12:01 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-06-16 17:34 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-06-25 9:19 ` Timur Safin
2020-06-16 18:31 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-06-29 20:16 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
2020-06-16 12:53 ` Igor Munkin
2020-06-25 9:45 ` Timur Safin
2020-06-25 9:47 ` Timur Safin
2020-07-08 12:23 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-07-08 12:34 ` Kirill Yukhin
2020-07-08 12:42 ` Kirill Yukhin
2020-07-08 12:38 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-07-09 5:13 ` Olga Arkhangelskaia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cbb50299-cb85-7cd3-d238-c1bf3b29090d@tarantool.org \
--to=arkholga@tarantool.org \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] cmake: add LTO support for building luajit' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox