From: Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>, gorcunov@gmail.com Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 09/16] box: split promote() into reasonable parts Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:26:30 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <c73cebab-dcf5-4a43-2937-92cf2c324f47@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5c38c2b4f516ce3777b2f3374f6c76f8e9229448.1626287002.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> Thanks for working on this! See 3 comments below. > diff --git a/src/box/box.cc b/src/box/box.cc > index 86370514a..445875f8f 100644 > --- a/src/box/box.cc > +++ b/src/box/box.cc > @@ -1527,6 +1527,147 @@ box_wait_quorum(uint32_t lead_id, int64_t target_lsn, int quorum, <...> > + > +/** > + * Check whether the greatest promote term has changed since it was last read. > + * IOW check that a foreign PROMOTE arrived while we were sleeping. > + */ > +static int > +box_check_promote_term_changed(uint64_t promote_term) 1. Normally you call check functions using the pattern "check_something_correct". Here the correct behaviour is the term being intact. So I propose to rename it to box_check_promote_term_intact. > +{ > + if (txn_limbo.promote_greatest_term != promote_term) { > + diag_set(ClientError, ER_INTERFERING_PROMOTE, > + txn_limbo.owner_id); > + return -1; > + } > + return 0; > +} <...> > + > +/** > + * A helper to wait until all limbo entries are ready to be confirmed, i.e. > + * written to WAL and have gathered a quorum of ACKs from replicas. > + * Return lsn of the last limbo entry on success, -1 on error. > + */ > +static int64_t > +box_wait_limbo_acked(void) > +{ > + if (txn_limbo_is_empty(&txn_limbo)) > + return txn_limbo.confirmed_lsn; > + > + uint64_t promote_term = txn_limbo.promote_greatest_term; > + int quorum = replication_synchro_quorum; > + struct txn_limbo_entry *last_entry; > + last_entry = txn_limbo_last_synchro_entry(&txn_limbo); > + /* Wait for the last entries WAL write. */ > + if (last_entry->lsn < 0) { > + int64_t tid = last_entry->txn->id; > + > + if (wal_sync(NULL) < 0) > + return -1; > + > + if (box_check_promote_term_changed(promote_term) < 0) 2. Why < 0? It is not a in the code guidelines, but don't we usually use '!= 0'? '< 0' normally assumes you can get > 0, 0, and < 0 meaning different things, like it is done in iproto occassionally. > + return -1; > + if (txn_limbo_is_empty(&txn_limbo)) > + return txn_limbo.confirmed_lsn; > + if (tid != txn_limbo_last_synchro_entry(&txn_limbo)->txn->id) { > + diag_set(ClientError, ER_QUORUM_WAIT, quorum, > + "new synchronous transactions appeared"); > + return -1; > + } > + } <...> > + > +/** Write and process a PROMOTE request. */ > +static void > +box_issue_promote(uint32_t prev_leader_id, int64_t promote_lsn) > +{ > + assert(box_raft()->volatile_term == box_raft()->term); > + assert(promote_lsn >= 0); > + txn_limbo_write_promote(&txn_limbo, promote_lsn, > + box_raft()->term); 3. Maybe cache box_raft() value in a variable? Its usage would look shorter then. The same in other places where it is used more than once. Up to you. > + struct synchro_request req = { > + .type = IPROTO_PROMOTE, > + .replica_id = prev_leader_id, > + .origin_id = instance_id, > + .lsn = promote_lsn, > + .term = box_raft()->term, > + }; > + txn_limbo_process(&txn_limbo, &req); > + assert(txn_limbo_is_empty(&txn_limbo)); > +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 23:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-14 18:25 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 00/16] forbid implicit limbo ownership transition Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 01/16] replication: always send raft state to subscribers Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 02/16] txn_limbo: fix promote term filtering Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 03/16] txn_limbo: persist the latest effective promote in snapshot Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 04/16] replication: encode version in JOIN request Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 05/16] replication: add META stage to JOIN Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 06/16] replication: send latest effective promote in initial join Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-21 23:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-23 7:44 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-26 23:43 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 07/16] replication: send current Raft term in join response Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-21 23:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-23 7:44 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-26 23:43 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-29 20:46 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 08/16] raft: refactor raft_new_term() Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 09/16] box: split promote() into reasonable parts Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-21 23:26 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-07-23 7:45 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-26 23:44 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-29 20:46 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 10/16] box: make promote always bump the term Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-26 23:45 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-29 20:46 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 11/16] box: make promote on the current leader a no-op Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-21 23:26 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-23 7:45 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 12/16] box: fix an assertion failure after a spurious wakeup in promote Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-21 23:29 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-23 7:45 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 13/16] box: allow calling promote on a candidate Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-15 14:06 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 14/16] box: extract promote() settings to a separate method Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 15/16] replication: forbid implicit limbo owner transition Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-14 18:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 16/16] box: introduce `box.ctl.demote` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-15 17:13 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-15 20:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 17/16] replication: fix flaky election_qsync.test Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-26 23:43 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 00/16] forbid implicit limbo ownership transition Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-07-29 20:47 ` Sergey Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=c73cebab-dcf5-4a43-2937-92cf2c324f47@tarantool.org \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 09/16] box: split promote() into reasonable parts' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox