From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: Nikita Pettik <korablev@tarantool.org>, tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Cc: kostja@tarantool.org
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 9/9] sql: make <search condition> accept only boolean
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:12:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <babeb4a1-0859-15d4-4d30-646b0de2b045@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <103cef3d31c59d1b869a7675a01ed2e6279a47ef.1555252410.git.korablev@tarantool.org>
Thanks for the patch! See 4 comments below.
On 14/04/2019 18:04, Nikita Pettik wrote:
> <search condition> is a predicate used as a part of WHERE and
> JOIN clauses. ANSI SQL states that <search condition> must
> accept only boolean arguments. In our SQL it is implemented as
> bytecode instruction OP_If which in turn carries out logic of
> conditional jump. Since it can be involved in executing other routines
> different from <search condition>,
1. Which other routines? What is a valid case of OP_If with non-boolean
value in check?
> we pass to it additional argument
> when generating bytecode for WHERE and JOIN clauses. When VDBE performs
> OP_If and detects such flag, it checks passed argument to be boolean.
>
> Closes #3723
2. In addition, it fixes https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3651,
doesn't it?
> diff --git a/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua b/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua
> index a58dc87c7..374a7d3e4 100755
> --- a/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua
> +++ b/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua
> @@ -89,15 +89,15 @@ test:do_delete_tests("e_delete-1.1", {
> -- NULL are retained.
> --
> test:do_delete_tests("e_delete-1.2", {
> - {1, "DELETE FROM t3 WHERE 1 ; SELECT x FROM t3", {}},
> - {2, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE 0 ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}},
> - {3, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE 0.0 ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}},
> + {1, "DELETE FROM t3 WHERE true ; SELECT x FROM t3", {}},
> + {2, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE false ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}},
> + {3, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE false ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}},
3. The last two lines are exactly the same. Why not to drop one?
> {4, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE NULL ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}},
> {5, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE y!='two'; SELECT x FROM t4", {2}},
> {6, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE y='two' ; SELECT x FROM t4", {}},
> {7, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE x=(SELECT max(x) FROM t5);SELECT x FROM t5", {1, 2, 3, 4}},
> {8, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE (SELECT max(x) FROM t4) ;SELECT x FROM t5", {1, 2, 3, 4}},
> - {9, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE (SELECT max(x) FROM t6) ;SELECT x FROM t5", {}},
> + {9, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE (SELECT max(x) FROM t6) != 0 ;SELECT x FROM t5", {}},
> {10, "DELETE FROM t6 WHERE y>'seven' ; SELECT y FROM t6", {"one", "four", "five"}},
> })
>
> diff --git a/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua b/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua
> index 970eeeed9..e47b0f43d 100755
> --- a/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua
> +++ b/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua
> @@ -448,15 +448,15 @@ test:do_select_tests(
> -- true are included from the dataset.
> --
> local data ={
> - {"1"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (1) ",t1_cross_t2},
> - {"2"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (0) ",{}},
> + {"1"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2},
> + {"2"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (false) ",{}},
> {"3"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (NULL) ",{}},
> - {"6"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (0.9) ",t1_cross_t2},
> - {"7"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON ('0.9') ",t1_cross_t2},
> - {"8"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (0.0) ",{}},
> + {"6"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2},
> + {"7"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2},
> + {"8"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2},
4. The same. 3 duplicates.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-16 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-14 15:03 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/9] Introduce type BOOLEAN in SQL Nikita Pettik
2019-04-14 15:03 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/9] sql: refactor mem_apply_numeric_type() Nikita Pettik
2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/9] sql: disallow text values participate in sum() aggregate Nikita Pettik
2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik
2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik
2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/9] sql: use msgpack types instead of custom ones Nikita Pettik
2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik
2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik
2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/9] sql: introduce type boolean Nikita Pettik
2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik
2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik
2019-04-23 21:06 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/9] sql: improve type determination for column meta Nikita Pettik
2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik
2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik
2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 6/9] sql: make comparison predicate return boolean Nikita Pettik
2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik
2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 7/9] sql: make predicates accept and " Nikita Pettik
2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-18 17:55 ` n.pettik
2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 9/9] sql: make <search condition> accept only boolean Nikita Pettik
2019-04-16 14:12 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2019-04-18 17:55 ` [tarantool-patches] " n.pettik
2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-23 19:59 ` n.pettik
2019-04-23 21:06 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-23 22:01 ` n.pettik
[not found] ` <b2a84f129c2343d3da3311469cbb7b20488a21c2.1555252410.git.korablev@tarantool.org>
2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 8/9] sql: make LIKE predicate return boolean result Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-18 17:55 ` n.pettik
2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik
2019-04-24 10:28 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/9] Introduce type BOOLEAN in SQL Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-04-25 8:46 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=babeb4a1-0859-15d4-4d30-646b0de2b045@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=kostja@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 9/9] sql: make <search condition> accept only boolean' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox