From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maxim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>,
tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, skaplun@tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Throw any errors before stack changes in trace stitching.
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:58:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b330210f-3772-4284-be97-6bae07ae5756@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c07d575-620b-4832-bcc9-04a7ccbfa35e@tarantool.org>
Max, thanks for fixes! LGTM
On 2/20/24 11:08, Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> Hello, Max,
>
> thanks for the patch! see my comments
>
> Sergey
>
> On 2/16/24 14:11, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
>> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>>
>> Thanks to doujiang24.
>>
>> (cherry-picked from commit 3f9389edc6cdf3f78a6896d550c236860aed62b2)
>>
>> The Lua stack is changed in the `lj_record_stop`, so if the trace
>> is aborted, for example, when the `maxsnap` is reached, and an
>> error is thrown from there, the execution continues with an
>> unbalanced stack.
>>
>> Since the only error that is thrown from the `lj_record_stop`
>> with modified stack is `LJ_TRERR_SNAPOV`, this patch adds a
>
> As I see lj_record_stop [1] throws only LJ_TRERR_RETRY or
>
> I got you wrong.
>
>
> 1.
> https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/blob/0d313b243194a0b8d2399d8b549ca5a0ff234db5/src/lj_record.c#L299
>
>> check for snapshot overflow to the `recff_stitch`.
>>
>> Maxim Kokryashkin:
>> * added the description and the test for the problem
>>
>> Part of tarantool/tarantool#9595
>> ---
>> Branch:
>> https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/lj-pr-720-errors-before-stitch
>> PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/9703
>> Issues:
>> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9595
>> https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/720
>>
>> src/lj_ffrecord.c | 4 ++++
>> .../lj-pr-720-errors-before-stitch.test.lua | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644
>> test/tarantool-tests/lj-pr-720-errors-before-stitch.test.lua
>>
>> diff --git a/src/lj_ffrecord.c b/src/lj_ffrecord.c
>> index 1b2ddb72..e3ed80fb 100644
>> --- a/src/lj_ffrecord.c
>> +++ b/src/lj_ffrecord.c
>> @@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ static void recff_stitch(jit_State *J)
>> const BCIns *pc = frame_pc(base-1);
>> TValue *pframe = frame_prevl(base-1);
>>
>> + /* Check for this now. Throwing in lj_record_stop messes up the
>> stack. */
>> + if (J->cur.nsnap >= (MSize)J->param[JIT_P_maxsnap])
>> + lj_trace_err(J, LJ_TRERR_SNAPOV);
>> +
>> /* Move func + args up in Lua stack and insert continuation. */
>> memmove(&base[1], &base[-1-LJ_FR2], sizeof(TValue)*nslot);
>> setframe_ftsz(nframe, ((char *)nframe - (char *)pframe) +
>> FRAME_CONT);
>> diff --git
>> a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-pr-720-errors-before-stitch.test.lua
>> b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-pr-720-errors-before-stitch.test.lua
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..53b7b5ea
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-pr-720-errors-before-stitch.test.lua
>
> You could omit "-pr" in the name, anyway
>
> https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/720 redirects to
> https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/720.
>
>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>> +local tap = require('tap')
>> +local test = tap.test('lj-pr-720-errors-before-stitch'):skipcond({
>> + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
>> +})
>> +test:plan(1)
>> +
>> +-- `math.modf` recording is NYI.
>> +local modf = require('math').modf
>> +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1', 'maxsnap=1')
>> +
>> +-- The loop has only two iterations: the first to detect its
>> +-- hotness and the second to record it. The snapshot limit is
>> +-- set to one and is certainly reached.
>> +for _ = 1, 2 do
>> + -- Forcify stitch.
>> + modf(1.2)
>> +end
>> +
>> +test:ok(true, 'stack is balanced')
>> +test:done(true)
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 11:11 Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-20 8:08 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-03-11 15:58 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2024-02-21 12:34 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-22 14:03 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b330210f-3772-4284-be97-6bae07ae5756@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Throw any errors before stack changes in trace stitching.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox