From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Evgeniy Temirgaleev <e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] ARM64: Make tobit conversions match JIT backend behavior.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:31:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ammsZW1JL3yiIMPm@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1785262820.423211546@f512.i.mail.ru>
Hi, Evgeniy!
Thanks for the review.
Please consider my answers below.
On 28.07.26, Evgeniy Temirgaleev wrote:
> Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the patch!
>
> LGTM with a comment, please see below.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Evgeniy Temirgaleev
>
> >
> > From: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
> > To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>, Evgeniy Temirgaleev <e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org
> > >
> > Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org
> > >
> > Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 5:53 PM +03:00
> > From: Mike Pall <mike>
> >
> > Thanks to Peter Cawley.
> >
> > (cherry picked from commit cdc2db3aeac442e139c3b1fda715fdfa78da8791)
> >
> > On the aarch64 architecture, the `tobit()` function incorrectly
> > truncates instead of rounding to the nearest integer. This leads to
> > inconsistency between various VMs (comparing to x86/x64, for example)
> > and between the arm64 VM and JIT.
> >
> > This patch uses an addition of 2^52 + 2^51 constant to the given
> > argument to convert it to the nearest integer value. After reading the
> > lowest 32 bits of the register, we get the expected result.
> >
> > Sergey Kaplun:
> > * added the description and the test for the problem
> >
> > Part of tarantool/tarantool#12880
> > ---
> > src/vm_arm64.dasc | 20 ++++---------
> > .../lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua
> >
> > diff --git a/src/vm_arm64.dasc b/src/vm_arm64.dasc
> > index 57131140..4ffd7378 100644
> > --- a/src/vm_arm64.dasc
> > +++ b/src/vm_arm64.dasc
<snipped>
> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua
> > b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..31cf97ca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua
> > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > +local tap = require('tap')
> > +
> > +-- Test file to demonstrate LuaJIT's incorrect bit.tobit
> > +-- behaviour for arm64.
> > +-- See also: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1253.
> > +
> > +local test = tap.test('lj-1253-tobit-conversion')
> > +
> > +test:plan(2)
> > +
> > +test:is(bit.tobit(1.7), 2, 'correct bit.tobit rounding')
> >
>
> I suppose, what Sergey Bronnikov proposes adding parentheses in the messages also. Here,
Maybe, but we use parentheses only in the comments AFAICS:
| grep "test:\(ok\|is\|match\|samevalues\).*'.*\`" -R test/tarantool-tests/ | wc -l
| 0
And there are examples of mentioning the functions in the test names:
| test/tarantool-tests/lj-928-int-min-negation.test.lua:test:is(tonumber('-0x80000000'), INT32_MIN, 'no UB during strscan_hex')
| test/tarantool-tests/lj-928-int-min-negation.test.lua:test:is(tonumber('-0b10000000000000000000000000000000'), INT32_MIN,
| test/tarantool-tests/lj-928-int-min-negation.test.lua:test:is(tonumber('-2147483648'), INT32_MIN, 'no UB during strscan_scan')
So, this part is ignored.
> >
> > +
> > +test:skipcond({
> > + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
> > +})
> > +
> > +local results = {}
> > +
> > +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
> > +
> > +for i = 1, 4 do
> > + -- Use constants on trace.
> > + results[i] = bit.tobit(1.7)
> > +end
> > +
> > +test:samevalues(results, 'consistent JIT and VM behaviour for bit.tobit')
> >
> >
>
> and here.
Ditto.
>
> >
> > +
> > +test:done(true)
> > --
> > 2.55.0
> >
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 14:53 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix tobit conversion on arm architectures Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-21 14:53 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] ARM64: Make tobit conversions match JIT backend behavior Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-24 10:00 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-24 10:59 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-28 18:20 ` Evgeniy Temirgaleev via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-29 7:31 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2026-07-21 14:53 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] ARM: Make hard-float " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-24 10:02 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-24 11:03 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-28 18:36 ` Evgeniy Temirgaleev via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ammsZW1JL3yiIMPm@root \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] ARM64: Make tobit conversions match JIT backend behavior.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox