From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>,
Evgeniy Temirgaleev <e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] ARM64: Make tobit conversions match JIT backend behavior.
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:00:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a098bc2-ddb1-4fca-afdf-2a91cc80f7b9@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5577cfb5077811aa4c918227df30e059ce4fb4e.1784642965.git.skaplun@tarantool.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3190 bytes --]
Hello,
thanks for the patch! LGTM with a minor comment.
Sergey
On 7/21/26 17:53, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>
> Thanks to Peter Cawley.
>
> (cherry picked from commit cdc2db3aeac442e139c3b1fda715fdfa78da8791)
>
> On the aarch64 architecture, the `tobit()` function incorrectly
> truncates instead of rounding to the nearest integer. This leads to
> inconsistency between various VMs (comparing to x86/x64, for example)
> and between the arm64 VM and JIT.
>
> This patch uses an addition of 2^52 + 2^51 constant to the given
> argument to convert it to the nearest integer value. After reading the
> lowest 32 bits of the register, we get the expected result.
>
> Sergey Kaplun:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
>
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#12880
> ---
> src/vm_arm64.dasc | 20 ++++---------
> .../lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua
>
> diff --git a/src/vm_arm64.dasc b/src/vm_arm64.dasc
> index 57131140..4ffd7378 100644
> --- a/src/vm_arm64.dasc
> +++ b/src/vm_arm64.dasc
> @@ -1613,22 +1613,14 @@ static void build_subroutines(BuildCtx *ctx)
> |
> |//-- Bit library --------------------------------------------------------
> |
> - |// FP number to bit conversion for soft-float. Clobbers CARG1-CARG3
> + |// FP number to bit conversion. Clobbers CARG1-CARG2, FARG1-FARG2.
> |->vm_tobit_fb:
> | bls ->fff_fallback
> - | add CARG2, CARG1, CARG1
> - | mov CARG3, #1076
> - | sub CARG3, CARG3, CARG2, lsr #53
> - | cmp CARG3, #53
> - | bhi >1
> - | and CARG2, CARG2, #U64x(001fffff,ffffffff)
> - | orr CARG2, CARG2, #U64x(00200000,00000000)
> - | cmp CARG1, #0
> - | lsr CARG2, CARG2, CARG3
> - | cneg CARG1w, CARG2w, mi
> - | br lr
> - |1:
> - | mov CARG1w, #0
> + | fmov FARG1, CARG1
> + | movz CARG2, #0x4338, lsl #48
> + | fmov FARG2, CARG2
> + | fadd FARG1, FARG1, FARG2
> + | fmov CARG1w, s0
> | br lr
> |
> |.macro .ffunc_bit, name
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..31cf97ca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1253-tobit-conversion.test.lua
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +local tap = require('tap')
> +
> +-- Test file to demonstrate LuaJIT's incorrect bit.tobit
We usually add parentheses to the name of the function. Here and below.
Feel free to ignore.
> +-- behaviour for arm64.
> +-- See also:https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1253.
> +
> +local test = tap.test('lj-1253-tobit-conversion')
> +
> +test:plan(2)
> +
> +test:is(bit.tobit(1.7), 2, 'correct bit.tobit rounding')
> +
> +test:skipcond({
> + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
> +})
> +
> +local results = {}
> +
> +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
> +
> +for i = 1, 4 do
> + -- Use constants on trace.
> + results[i] = bit.tobit(1.7)
> +end
> +
> +test:samevalues(results, 'consistent JIT and VM behaviour for bit.tobit')
> +
> +test:done(true)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3805 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 14:53 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix tobit conversion on arm architectures Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-21 14:53 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] ARM64: Make tobit conversions match JIT backend behavior Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-24 10:00 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2026-07-24 10:59 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-21 14:53 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] ARM: Make hard-float " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-24 10:02 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-07-24 11:03 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a098bc2-ddb1-4fca-afdf-2a91cc80f7b9@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] ARM64: Make tobit conversions match JIT backend behavior.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox