From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: fix libfficcall compilation for old GCC
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:00:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aihUqtEG4QqA7-vl@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b4838ea-4ada-4bf5-8e20-8083133139df@tarantool.org>
Sergey,
Thanks for the review!
Fixed your comment and force-pushed the branch.
On 09.06.26, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hello, Sergey,
>
> Thanks for the patch! LGTM with a minor comment.
>
> Sergey
>
> On 6/8/26 13:23, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > On CentOS 7 GCC has no std=c99 by default. This leads to compilation
> > warnings and errors for ‘for’ loop initial declarations. This patch
> > fixes that by declaring the variable out of the loop body.
> > ---
> >
> > Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-noticket-fix-tests-old-gcc
> > CI failure:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/actions/runs/27124968515/job/80063067169#step:6:10593
> >
> > test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
> > index 2145b556..129bc75d 100644
> > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
> > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
> > @@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ int test_2_large_agg_a16(int x, large_agg_a16 s1, large_agg_a16 s2)
> > const int *v1 = s1.v;
> > const int *v2 = s2.v;
> > int sum = x;
> > - for (int i = 0; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
> > + int i = 0;
> > + for (; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
>
> isn't better declaring outside the loop and define in a loop?
>
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
>
> It looks more familiar this way. Feel free to ignore.
Fixed:
===================================================================
diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
index 129bc75d..85d76436 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/ffi-ccall/libfficcall.c
@@ -307,8 +307,8 @@ int test_2_large_agg_a16(int x, large_agg_a16 s1, large_agg_a16 s2)
const int *v1 = s1.v;
const int *v2 = s2.v;
int sum = x;
- int i = 0;
- for (; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < lengthof(s1.v); i++) {
sum += v1[i] + v2[i];
}
return sum;
===================================================================
>
> > sum += v1[i] + v2[i];
> > }
> > return sum;
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 10:23 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-09 13:55 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-09 18:00 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aihUqtEG4QqA7-vl@root \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: fix libfficcall compilation for old GCC' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox