From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Bronnikov <estetus@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] misc: introduce flags with profiler support status
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:00:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abKq8Jd2tHow9Efs@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aee5ffc345f4e25ed20112224c659ac1744ec583.1769081050.git.sergeyb@tarantool.org>
Hi, Sergey!
Thanks for the patch!
Please consider my comments below.
On 22.01.26, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> The patch introduce flags in module "misc" with support status
> for sysprof and memprof: `misc.sysprof.enabled` and
> `misc.memprof.enabled`. Both flags are boolean and always
Let's rename it to `available` instead. The `enabled` may be interpreted
as `is_running`, and confuse the user then.
> available on platforms supported by profilers (Windows is not
> supported).
>
> Closes tarantool/tarantool#12215
Minor: Should be Resolves, since it is closed when we bump LuaJIT in the
Tarantool repository.
> ---
> src/lib_misc.c | 4 ++++
> .../profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua | 5 ++++-
> test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua | 5 ++++-
> .../profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua | 5 ++++-
> test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua | 5 ++++-
> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lib_misc.c b/src/lib_misc.c
> index 034ff878..6b2278c1 100644
> --- a/src/lib_misc.c
> +++ b/src/lib_misc.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,11 @@ LUALIB_API int luaopen_misc(struct lua_State *L)
> LJ_LIB_REG(L, LUAM_MISCLIBNAME, misc);
> #if !LJ_TARGET_WINDOWS
> LJ_LIB_REG(L, LUAM_MISCLIBNAME ".memprof", misc_memprof);
> + lua_pushboolean(L, LJ_HASMEMPROF);
> + lua_setfield(L, -2, "enabled");
> LJ_LIB_REG(L, LUAM_MISCLIBNAME ".sysprof", misc_sysprof);
> + lua_pushboolean(L, LJ_HASSYSPROF);
> + lua_setfield(L, -2, "enabled");
Is it possible to use standard `LJLIB_PUSH() LJLIB_SET()` machinery
instead?
> #endif /* !LJ_TARGET_WINDOWS */
> return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua
> index de0aa136..f867cfc6 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ local test = tap.test('misclib-memprof-lapi-disabled'):skipcond({
> ['Memprof is enabled'] = not os.getenv('LUAJIT_DISABLE_MEMPROF'),
> })
>
> -test:plan(6)
> +test:plan(8)
>
> -- Attempt to start memprof when it is disabled.
> local res, err, errno = misc.memprof.start()
> @@ -19,4 +19,7 @@ test:ok(err:match('profiler is disabled'),
> 'error on stop when memprof is disabled')
> test:ok(type(errno) == 'number', 'errno on start when memprof is disabled')
>
> +test:ok(type(misc.memprof.enabled) == 'boolean', 'misc.memprof.enabled exists')
I suppose that
| test:is(misc.memprof.available, false, 'misc.memprof.enabled correct')
is enough.
Same for other tests below.
> +test:ok(misc.memprof.enabled == false, 'misc.memprof.enabled is false')
> +
> test:done(true)
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> index cd675864..44ba8b08 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua
<snipped>
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua
> index 2a9ce796..c023d8f1 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi-disabled.test.lua
<snipped>
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
> index 701d58e4..41ed43e0 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/profilers/misclib-sysprof-lapi.test.lua
<snipped>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 11:24 Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-01-22 13:49 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-03-12 12:00 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2026-03-12 17:04 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abKq8Jd2tHow9Efs@root \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=estetus@gmail.com \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] misc: introduce flags with profiler support status' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox