From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] ARM64: Fix LDP/STP fusing for unaligned accesses. Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 10:26:24 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <aGI8IIVX8HfKci7G@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <63170032-dc7a-47e4-ad84-9627a02070e0@tarantool.org> Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the review! Fixed your comments and force-pushed the branch. On 27.06.25, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > Hi, Sergey, > > thanks for the patch! LGTM with a minor two comments below. > > Sergey > > On 6/26/25 18:12, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > > From: Mike Pall <mike> > > > > Thanks to Peter Cawley. > > > > (cherry picked from commit 0fa2f1cbcf023ad0549f1428809e506fa2c78552) > > > > The arm64 emitting of load/store operation works incorrectly in the > > case when at least one offset of load/store to be fused into ldp/stp is > > misaligned. In this case this misaligning is ignored, and instructions > > are fused, which leads to loading/storing from/to at least one incorrect > > address. > > > > For example, the following instructions: > > | stur w0, [x1, #17] > > | stur w0, [x1, #21] > > > > May be fused to the following: > > | stp w0, w0, [x1, #16] > > > > This patch prevents fusion in this case by testing the alignment with > > the help of bitwise ROR by the alignment value. In case of misaligned > > offset, the value overflows the 7-bit length mask in the check. > > > > The negative immediate (7-bit width including sign bit) is limited by > > the corresponding addition of `64 << sc` (it is harmless in the case of > > positive values). > > > > Sergey Kaplun: > > * added the description and the test for the problem > > > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#11278 > > --- > > > > Related issues: > > *https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1056 > > *https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/11278 > > Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing > > > > src/lj_emit_arm64.h | 2 +- > > ...6-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua | 98 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua > > > > diff --git a/src/lj_emit_arm64.h b/src/lj_emit_arm64.h > > index 30cd3505..5c1bc372 100644 > > --- a/src/lj_emit_arm64.h > > +++ b/src/lj_emit_arm64.h <snipped> > > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua > > new file mode 100644 > > index 00000000..5d03097e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua > > @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ > > +local tap = require('tap') > > +local ffi = require('ffi') > > + > > +-- This test demonstrates LuaJIT's incorrect emitting of LDP/STP > > +-- instructions from LDUR/STUR instructions with misaligned offset > > +-- on arm64. > > +-- See alsohttps://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issue/1056. > s/issue/issues/ Fixed, thanks! =================================================================== diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua index 815da15d..5ff040e7 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ local ffi = require('ffi') -- This test demonstrates LuaJIT's incorrect emitting of LDP/STP -- instructions from LDUR/STUR instructions with misaligned offset -- on arm64. --- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issue/1056. +-- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1056. local test = tap.test('lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing'):skipcond({ ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(), }) =================================================================== > > +local test = tap.test('lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing'):skipcond({ > > + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(), > > +}) > > + <snipped> > > + > > +test:is(resl, 0x4030201, 'pair of misaligned loads, left') > > +test:is(resr, 0x8070605, 'pair of misaligned loads, right') > > What does mean these magic numbers? Please add a comment or > > use a variable with self-explained name. Here and below. Added the comments nearby, see the corresponding patch below: =================================================================== diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua index 5d03097e..815da15d 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1056-arm64-ldp-sdp-misaligned-fusing.test.lua @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ for _ = 1, N_ITERATIONS do resr = ffi.cast('int32_t *', ptr + 5)[0] end +-- Values are resulted from the `init_buf()` function with the +-- corresponding offset. test:is(resl, 0x4030201, 'pair of misaligned loads, left') test:is(resr, 0x8070605, 'pair of misaligned loads, right') @@ -92,6 +94,8 @@ for _ = 1, N_ITERATIONS do resl = ffi.cast('int32_t *', ptr)[0] end +-- Values are resulted from the `init_buf()` function with the +-- corresponding offset. test:is(resl, 0x3020100, 'aligned / misaligned load, aligned') test:is(resr, 0x8070605, 'aligned / misaligned load, misaligned') =================================================================== <snipped> -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 7:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2025-06-26 15:12 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2025-06-27 13:20 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2025-06-30 7:26 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2025-07-01 8:53 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=aGI8IIVX8HfKci7G@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] ARM64: Fix LDP/STP fusing for unaligned accesses.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox