From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] sysprof: fix sampling outside the VM Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:11:25 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <aF0czX4z5r60_ujE@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4569e398-f93d-4192-8eae-5408eeaed9e7@tarantool.org> Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the review! Fixed your comments and force-pushed the branch. On 25.06.25, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > Hi, Sergey, > > thanks for the patch! Please see my comments below. > > Sergey > > On 6/25/25 13:03, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > > If the signal by timer is handled outside the VM, the `g->vmstate` > > equals zero. This was interpreted by the sysprof as the trace with the > > corresponding number and leads to the assertion failure. > > > > This patch fixes that by checking this case and dumping only the host > > stack outside the VM. > > > > Resolves tarantool/tarantool#11185 > > Resolves tarantool/tarantool#11429 > > --- > > > > Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert > > Related issues: > > *https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/11185 > > *https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/11429 > > > > Mentinoned in the test: > > *https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/10803 > > > > src/lj_sysprof.c | 4 +- > > .../gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c > > > > diff --git a/src/lj_sysprof.c b/src/lj_sysprof.c > > index cf6161a5..013df2cd 100644 > > --- a/src/lj_sysprof.c > > +++ b/src/lj_sysprof.c > > @@ -297,7 +297,9 @@ static void sysprof_record_sample(struct sysprof *sp, siginfo_t *info) > > { > > global_State *g = sp->g; > > uint32_t _vmstate = ~(uint32_t)(g->vmstate); > > - uint32_t vmstate = _vmstate < LJ_VMST_TRACE ? _vmstate : LJ_VMST_TRACE; > > + /* `g->vmstate` is 0 outside the VM. Hence, dump only the host stack. */ > > + uint32_t vmstate = ~_vmstate == 0 ? LJ_VMST_INTERP : > > + _vmstate < LJ_VMST_TRACE ? _vmstate : LJ_VMST_TRACE; > > Nested ternary operators is not convenient for reading, I would probably > convert at least outer condition to > > if-else. Feel free to ignore. Fixed. See the iterative patch below: =================================================================== diff --git a/src/lj_sysprof.c b/src/lj_sysprof.c index 013df2cd..4c109074 100644 --- a/src/lj_sysprof.c +++ b/src/lj_sysprof.c @@ -297,9 +297,15 @@ static void sysprof_record_sample(struct sysprof *sp, siginfo_t *info) { global_State *g = sp->g; uint32_t _vmstate = ~(uint32_t)(g->vmstate); + uint32_t vmstate; + /* `g->vmstate` is 0 outside the VM. Hence, dump only the host stack. */ - uint32_t vmstate = ~_vmstate == 0 ? LJ_VMST_INTERP : - _vmstate < LJ_VMST_TRACE ? _vmstate : LJ_VMST_TRACE; + if (g->vmstate == 0) + vmstate = LJ_VMST_INTERP; + else if (_vmstate < LJ_VMST_TRACE) + vmstate = _vmstate; + else + vmstate = LJ_VMST_TRACE; lj_assertX(pthread_self() == sp->thread, "bad thread during sysprof record sample"); =================================================================== > > > > > lj_assertX(pthread_self() == sp->thread, > > "bad thread during sysprof record sample"); > > diff --git a/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c b/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 00000000..c4d7ea67 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ > > +#include "lua.h" > > +#include "lauxlib.h" > > + > > +/* Need for skipcond for OS and ARCH. */ > > +#include "lj_arch.h" > > + > > +#include "test.h" > > +#include "utils.h" > > + > > +#include <signal.h> > > +#include <unistd.h> > > + > > +/* > > + * Check that there is no assertion failure during the dump of the > > + * sample outside the VM. > > + */ > > +static int gh_11185_stream_trace_assert(void *test_state) > > +{ > > I got the following warnings produced by compiler: > > [ 97%] Building C object > test/tarantool-c-tests/CMakeFiles/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.dir/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c.o > /home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c:17:12: > warning: ‘gh_11185_stream_trace_assert’ defined but not used > [-Wunused-function] > 17 | static int gh_11185_stream_trace_assert(void *test_state) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from > /home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c:8: > /home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/test/tarantool-c-tests/utils.h:34:13: > warning: ‘utils_lua_close’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > 34 | static void utils_lua_close(lua_State *L) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/test/tarantool-c-tests/utils.h:17:19: > warning: ‘utils_lua_init’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > 17 | static lua_State *utils_lua_init(void) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > [100%] Linking C executable gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.c_test Fixed like the following: =================================================================== diff --git a/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c b/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c index 78f08cde..69cd4da1 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c +++ b/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c @@ -5,7 +5,10 @@ #include "lj_arch.h" #include "test.h" + +#if LJ_HASSYSPROF && !defined(LUAJIT_USE_VALGRIND) #include "utils.h" +#endif /* LJ_HASSYSPROF && !defined(LUAJIT_USE_VALGRIND) */ #include <signal.h> #include <unistd.h> @@ -32,8 +35,10 @@ static int stream_trace_assert(void *test_state) int main(void) { #if LUAJIT_USE_VALGRIND + UNUSED(stream_trace_assert); return skip_all("Disabled due to #10803"); -#elif LUAJIT_DISABLE_SYSPROF +#elif !LJ_HASSYSPROF + UNUSED(stream_trace_assert); return skip_all("Sysprof is disabled"); #else /* LUAJIT_DISABLE_SYSPROF */ if (LUAJIT_OS != LUAJIT_OS_LINUX) =================================================================== > > CMake config string: cmake -S . -B build -DLUAJIT_USE_VALGRIND=ON > -DLUAJIT_USE_ASAN=OFF -DLUAJIT_USE_SYSMALLOC=ON -DLUAJIT_ENABLE_GC64=ON > -DLUA_USE_APICHECK=ON -DLUA_USE_ASSERT=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug > > > + lua_State *L = test_state; > > + (void)luaL_dostring(L, > > + "misc.sysprof.start({mode = 'C', path = '/dev/null'})"); > > + > > + pid_t self_pid = getpid(); > > + /* Dump the single sample outside the VM. */ > > + kill(self_pid, SIGPROF); > > + > > + /* No assertion fail -- stop the profiler and exit. */ > > + (void)luaL_dostring(L, "misc.sysprof.stop()"); > > + return TEST_EXIT_SUCCESS; > > +} > > + > > +int main(void) > > +{ > > +#if LUAJIT_USE_VALGRIND > > + return skip_all("Disabled due to #10803"); > > +#elif LUAJIT_DISABLE_SYSPROF > > + return skip_all("Sysprof is disabled"); > > +#else /* LUAJIT_DISABLE_SYSPROF */ > > + if (LUAJIT_OS != LUAJIT_OS_LINUX) > > + return skip_all("Sysprof is implemented for Linux only"); > > + if (LUAJIT_TARGET != LUAJIT_ARCH_X86 > > + && LUAJIT_TARGET != LUAJIT_ARCH_X64) > > + return skip_all("Sysprof is implemented for x86_64 only"); > > + > > + lua_State *L = utils_lua_init(); > > + > > + const struct test_unit tgroup[] = { > > + test_unit_def(gh_11185_stream_trace_assert) > > Do we really need a prefix "gh_11185_" when it is already present in the > filename? > > I would omit it. Removed prefix: =================================================================== diff --git a/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c b/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c index c4d7ea67..78f08cde 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c +++ b/test/tarantool-c-tests/gh-11185-stream-trace-assert.test.c @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ * Check that there is no assertion failure during the dump of the * sample outside the VM. */ -static int gh_11185_stream_trace_assert(void *test_state) +static int stream_trace_assert(void *test_state) { lua_State *L = test_state; (void)luaL_dostring(L, @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int main(void) lua_State *L = utils_lua_init(); const struct test_unit tgroup[] = { - test_unit_def(gh_11185_stream_trace_assert) + test_unit_def(stream_trace_assert) }; const int test_result = test_run_group(tgroup, L); utils_lua_close(L); =================================================================== > > > + }; > > + const int test_result = test_run_group(tgroup, L); > > + utils_lua_close(L); > > + return test_result; > > +#endif /* LUAJIT_DISABLE_SYSPROF */ > > +} -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 10:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2025-06-25 10:03 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2025-06-25 13:45 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2025-06-26 10:11 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2025-06-27 13:00 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=aF0czX4z5r60_ujE@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] sysprof: fix sampling outside the VM' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox