Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org,
	Konstantin Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org>
Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] box: rework box_lua_{call, eval} to use input port
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:44:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a87d6a5d-d82b-e404-50ef-2e3124e9f948@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190620080945.GJ15155@atlas>

On 20.06.2019 11:09, Konstantin Osipov wrote:
> * Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org> [19/06/20 10:54]:
>>        /**
>> 	 * Dump the content of a port to a given Lua stack.
>> 	 * When is_flat == true is specified, the data is dumped
>> 	 * directly to Lua stack, item-by-item. Otherwise, a
>> 	 * result table is created.
>> 	 */
> 
> Still I miss why we need this mode from this comment. Is this for
> 1.6 compatibility? I would ditch it in this case, we are not
>   obliged to support 1.6 in 2.3.
	/**
	 * Dump the content of a port to a given Lua stack.
	 * When is_flat == true is specified, the data is dumped
	 * directly to Lua stack, item-by-item. Otherwise, a
	 * result table is created. The is_flat == true mode
	 * follows Lua functions convention to pass arguments
	 * and return a results, while is_flat == false follows
	 * Tarantool's :select convention when the table of
	 * results is returned.
	 */
	void (*dump_lua)(struct port *port, struct lua_State *L, bool is_flat);
	

> 
>> 	void (*dump_lua)(struct port *port, struct lua_State *L, bool is_flat);
>> 	
>>        /**
>> 	 * Get the content of a port as a msgpack data.
>> 	 * The lifecycle of the returned value is
>> 	 * implementation-specific: it may either be returned
>> 	 * directly from the port, in which case the data will
>> 	 * stay alive as long as the port is alive, or it may be
>> 	 * allocated on the fiber()->gc, in which case the caller
>> 	 * is responsible for cleaning up.
>> 	 **/
> 
> Once again, please also explain how it is going tobe used - by an
> obsolete convention, C stored routines expect msgpack data as
> input format for its arguments.
> 
>> 	const char *(*get_msgpack)(struct port *port, uint32_t *size);
	/**
	 * Get the content of a port as a msgpack data.
	 * By an obsolete convention, C stored routines expect
	 * msgpack data as input format for its arguments.
	 * This API is also usefull to process a function
	 * returned value as msgpack data in memory.
	 * The lifecycle of the returned value is
	 * implementation-specific: it may either be returned
	 * directly from the port, in which case the data will
	 * stay alive as long as the port is alive, or it may be
	 * allocated on the fiber()->gc, in which case the caller
	 * is responsible for cleaning up.
	 **/
	const char *(*get_msgpack)(struct port *port, uint32_t *size);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-13 14:08 [PATCH v3 0/6] box: rework functions machinery Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-13 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] box: rework func cache update machinery Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-18 10:52   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-19 15:51     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-13 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] box: rework box_lua_{call, eval} to use input port Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-17  9:35   ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-06-17 10:27     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-18 12:12   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-19 15:51     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-19 16:11       ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-18 13:58   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-19 18:28   ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2019-06-20  7:53     ` Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-20  8:09       ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-06-20  8:44         ` Kirill Shcherbatov [this message]
2019-06-19 18:30   ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-06-13 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] box: rework func object as a function frontend Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-18 13:23   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-19 15:51     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-13 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] box: export registered functions in box.func folder Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-18 14:06   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-19 15:51     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-18 16:11   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-13 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] box: refactor box_lua_find helper Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-18 14:22   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-19 15:51     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-13 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] box: introduce Lua persistent functions Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-06-18 16:23   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-19 15:51     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a87d6a5d-d82b-e404-50ef-2e3124e9f948@tarantool.org \
    --to=kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \
    --cc=kostja@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] box: rework box_lua_{call, eval} to use input port' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox