Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lvasiliev <lvasiliev@tarantool.org>
To: Eugene Leonovich <gen.work@gmail.com>,
	Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>,
	alexander.turenko@tarantool.org,
	tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/6] iproto: Add negotiation phase
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:37:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a756fe8e-3651-a2b8-2fd7-c1a1835caa35@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADqioP3WatCGO6MdYSSH9bxD_kJcOpYjFxqV=uSh87_0WTWnew@mail.gmail.com>

On 25.03.2020 13:56, Eugene Leonovich wrote:
> 
>     A much simpler way to do it is to have a server switch to enable
>     new features.
>     It is less flexible, of course, because you can't have old and new
>     clients, but do you really want to have old and new clients?
> 
> 
> I do agree with Kostya, I think it's a good compromise. In my humble 
> opinion, the extended error feature in its current state is not worth 
> the complexity and overhead it adds. Instead, why not introduce a 
> Tarantool setting to choose whether you want to deal with a legacy or 
> extended error response type (and it's very unlikely that someone will 
> need to have 2 types at the same time). By default this setting will be 
> set to use the legacy mode, then after N minor 2.x releases, it can be 
> changed to use the new error type, the setting itself will be marked as 
> deprecated and removed in the next major release. From a connector's 
> point of view, it will also be easy to check if there are any additional 
> fields in the response body, which would mean that the connector has 
> received a "new" error.
> 
> -- 
> Thank you and best regards,
> Eugene Leonovich
Hi! Thanks for the feedback.
It sounds like a soft break of the backward compatibility.
"From a connector's point of view, it will also be easy to check if 
there are any additional fields in the response body, which would mean 
that the connector has received a "new" error." - No, the format of a 
message has been changed.
About negotiation phase - it's optional and I think it can be used for 
flexible session setup in the future (not only for errors).
If you use a default settings of the session negotiation phase is absent 
and don't add additional overhad.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-24 12:45 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/6] Extending error functionality Leonid Vasiliev
2020-03-24 12:45 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/6] error: Add a Lua backtrace to error Leonid Vasiliev
2020-04-05 22:14   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-08 13:56     ` Igor Munkin
2020-03-24 12:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/6] error: Add the custom error type Leonid Vasiliev
2020-04-05 22:14   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-03-24 12:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/6] iproto: Add negotiation phase Leonid Vasiliev
2020-03-24 20:02   ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-25  7:35     ` lvasiliev
2020-03-25  8:42       ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-25 10:56         ` Eugene Leonovich
2020-03-25 11:13           ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 11:37           ` lvasiliev [this message]
2020-03-26 11:18         ` lvasiliev
2020-03-26 12:16           ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 12:54             ` Kirill Yukhin
2020-03-26 13:19               ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 13:31                 ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 21:13       ` Alexander Turenko
2020-03-26 21:53         ` Alexander Turenko
2020-03-27  8:28         ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-26 23:35       ` Alexander Turenko
2020-03-27  8:39         ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-03-24 12:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/6] error: Add extended error transfer format Leonid Vasiliev
2020-03-24 12:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/6] error: Add test for extended error Leonid Vasiliev
2020-03-24 12:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 6/6] error: Transmit an error through IPROTO_OK as object Leonid Vasiliev
2020-03-27 23:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/6] Extending error functionality lvasiliev
2020-03-28 13:54   ` Alexander Turenko
2020-03-30 10:48     ` lvasiliev
2020-04-01 15:35 ` Alexander Turenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a756fe8e-3651-a2b8-2fd7-c1a1835caa35@tarantool.org \
    --to=lvasiliev@tarantool.org \
    --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=gen.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=kostja.osipov@gmail.com \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/6] iproto: Add negotiation phase' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox