* [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...)
@ 2024-09-23 11:28 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-24 10:28 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-09-23 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Kokryashkin, Sergey Bronnikov; +Cc: tarantool-patches
From: Mike Pall <mike>
Thanks to Peter Cawley.
(cherry picked from commit 92b89d005ab721a61bce6d471b052bcb236b81d7)
Before the patch, the recording of `select()` with a string argument
leads to the following IR:
| rcx > int CONV "1" int.num index
Where the operand has string type instead of number type.
This leads to the corresponding mcode:
| cvttsd2si ecx, xmm1
Where xmm1 has an undefined value. Thus leads to the undefined behaviour
for the recording trace.
This patch adds the missing coercion.
Sergey Kaplun:
* added the description and the test for the problem
Part of tarantool/tarantool#10199
---
Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select
Related issues:
* https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/10199
* https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1083
src/lj_record.c | 5 ++-
...ssing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
diff --git a/src/lj_record.c b/src/lj_record.c
index 96fe26d8..311d9fe7 100644
--- a/src/lj_record.c
+++ b/src/lj_record.c
@@ -1871,8 +1871,11 @@ static void rec_varg(jit_State *J, BCReg dst, ptrdiff_t nresults)
TRef tr = TREF_NIL;
ptrdiff_t idx = lj_ffrecord_select_mode(J, tridx, &J->L->base[dst-1]);
if (idx < 0) goto nyivarg;
- if (idx != 0 && !tref_isinteger(tridx))
+ if (idx != 0 && !tref_isinteger(tridx)) {
+ if (tref_isstr(tridx))
+ tridx = emitir(IRTG(IR_STRTO, IRT_NUM), tridx, 0);
tridx = emitir(IRTGI(IR_CONV), tridx, IRCONV_INT_NUM|IRCONV_INDEX);
+ }
if (idx != 0 && tref_isk(tridx)) {
emitir(IRTGI(idx <= nvararg ? IR_GE : IR_LT),
fr, lj_ir_kint(J, frofs+8*(int32_t)idx));
diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8089247f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+local tap = require('tap')
+
+-- Test file to demonstrate LuaJIT incorrect recording of
+-- `select()` fast function.
+-- See also: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1083.
+
+local test = tap.test('lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select'):skipcond({
+ ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
+})
+
+test:plan(1)
+
+-- Simplify the `jit.dump()` output.
+local select = select
+
+local function test_select(...)
+ local result
+ for _ = 1, 4 do
+ -- Before the patch, with the missed coercion to string, the
+ -- recording of `select()` below leads to the following IR:
+ -- | rcx > int CONV "1" int.num index
+ -- Where the operand has string type instead of number type.
+ -- This leads to the corresponding mcode:
+ -- | cvttsd2si ecx, xmm1
+ -- Where xmm1 has an undefined value. Thus leads to the
+ -- incorrect result for the call below.
+ result = select('1', ...)
+ end
+ return result
+end
+
+jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
+
+-- XXX: amount of arguments is empirical, see the comment above.
+local result = test_select(1, 2, 3, 4)
+
+test:is(result, 1, 'corect select result after recording')
+
+test:done(true)
--
2.46.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...)
2024-09-23 11:28 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...) Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
@ 2024-09-24 10:28 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-24 10:33 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-10-11 19:04 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-10-18 15:17 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-09-24 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Kaplun, Maxim Kokryashkin; +Cc: tarantool-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3677 bytes --]
Hi, Sergey,
thanks for the patch!
See minor comment below.
LGTM
On 23.09.2024 14:28, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>
> Thanks to Peter Cawley.
>
> (cherry picked from commit 92b89d005ab721a61bce6d471b052bcb236b81d7)
>
> Before the patch, the recording of `select()` with a string argument
> leads to the following IR:
> | rcx > int CONV "1" int.num index
> Where the operand has string type instead of number type.
> This leads to the corresponding mcode:
> | cvttsd2si ecx, xmm1
> Where xmm1 has an undefined value. Thus leads to the undefined behaviour
> for the recording trace.
>
> This patch adds the missing coercion.
>
> Sergey Kaplun:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
>
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#10199
> ---
>
> Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select
> Related issues:
> *https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/10199
> *https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1083
>
> src/lj_record.c | 5 ++-
> ...ssing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
>
> diff --git a/src/lj_record.c b/src/lj_record.c
> index 96fe26d8..311d9fe7 100644
> --- a/src/lj_record.c
> +++ b/src/lj_record.c
> @@ -1871,8 +1871,11 @@ static void rec_varg(jit_State *J, BCReg dst, ptrdiff_t nresults)
> TRef tr = TREF_NIL;
> ptrdiff_t idx = lj_ffrecord_select_mode(J, tridx, &J->L->base[dst-1]);
> if (idx < 0) goto nyivarg;
> - if (idx != 0 && !tref_isinteger(tridx))
> + if (idx != 0 && !tref_isinteger(tridx)) {
> + if (tref_isstr(tridx))
> + tridx = emitir(IRTG(IR_STRTO, IRT_NUM), tridx, 0);
> tridx = emitir(IRTGI(IR_CONV), tridx, IRCONV_INT_NUM|IRCONV_INDEX);
> + }
> if (idx != 0 && tref_isk(tridx)) {
> emitir(IRTGI(idx <= nvararg ? IR_GE : IR_LT),
> fr, lj_ir_kint(J, frofs+8*(int32_t)idx));
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..8089247f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +local tap = require('tap')
> +
> +-- Test file to demonstrate LuaJIT incorrect recording of
> +-- `select()` fast function.
> +-- See also:https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1083.
> +
> +local test = tap.test('lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select'):skipcond({
> + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
> +})
> +
> +test:plan(1)
> +
> +-- Simplify the `jit.dump()` output.
> +local select = select
> +
> +local function test_select(...)
> + local result
> + for _ = 1, 4 do
> + -- Before the patch, with the missed coercion to string, the
> + -- recording of `select()` below leads to the following IR:
> + -- | rcx > int CONV "1" int.num index
> + -- Where the operand has string type instead of number type.
> + -- This leads to the corresponding mcode:
> + -- | cvttsd2si ecx, xmm1
> + -- Where xmm1 has an undefined value. Thus leads to the
> + -- incorrect result for the call below.
> + result = select('1', ...)
> + end
> + return result
> +end
> +
> +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
> +
> +-- XXX: amount of arguments is empirical, see the comment above.
> +local result = test_select(1, 2, 3, 4)
> +
> +test:is(result, 1, 'corect select result after recording')
s/corect/correct/
> +
> +test:done(true)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4803 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...)
2024-09-24 10:28 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
@ 2024-09-24 10:33 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-09-24 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Bronnikov; +Cc: tarantool-patches
Hi, Sergey!
Thanks for the review!
Fixed your comment and force-pushed the branch.
On 24.09.24, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hi, Sergey,
>
> thanks for the patch!
>
> See minor comment below.
>
> LGTM
>
>
> On 23.09.2024 14:28, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
<snipped>
> > +
> > +test:is(result, 1, 'corect select result after recording')
>
> s/corect/correct/
Fixed, thanks!
===================================================================
diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.
lua
index 8089247f..5145efd5 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1083-missing-tostring-coercion-in-select.test.lua
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
-- XXX: amount of arguments is empirical, see the comment above.
local result = test_select(1, 2, 3, 4)
-test:is(result, 1, 'corect select result after recording')
+test:is(result, 1, 'correct select result after recording')
test:done(true)
===================================================================
>
>
> > +
> > +test:done(true)
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...)
2024-09-23 11:28 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...) Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-24 10:28 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
@ 2024-10-11 19:04 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-10-18 15:17 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-10-11 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Kaplun; +Cc: tarantool-patches
Hi, Sergey!
Thanks for the patch!
LGTM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...)
2024-09-23 11:28 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...) Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-24 10:28 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-10-11 19:04 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
@ 2024-10-18 15:17 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-10-18 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Kokryashkin, Sergey Bronnikov; +Cc: tarantool-patches
I've applied the patch into all long-term branches in tarantool/luajit
and bumped a new version in master [1], release/3.2 [2] and
release/2.11 [3].
[1]: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/10712
[2]: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/10713
[3]: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/10714
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-18 15:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-23 11:28 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Add missing coercion when recording select(string, ...) Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-24 10:28 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-24 10:33 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-10-11 19:04 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-10-18 15:17 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox