From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop().
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:57:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvERUBfiTjptO_hQ@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6xbb7bbda3bm7ryzzdovwq32wukphxi7aykr5wm3oxc3wsxxao@povjteevh5va>
Hi, Maxim!
Thanks for the review!
Fixed your comments and force-pushed the branch.
On 23.09.24, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
> Thanks for the patch!
> LGTM, except for a few nits below.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:37:40PM GMT, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > From: Mike Pall <mike>
> >
> > Thanks to Sergey Kaplun.
> >
> > (cherry picked from commit e45fd4cb713b610506213692f3b55a1869febb03)
> >
> > `narrow_conv_backprop()` misses the stack pointer (`nc->sp`) limit check
> > after a bunch of recursive calls that may change its value. As a result,
> It took me a minute to understand that sentence. Let's paraphrase it the
> following way:
>
> | The function narrow_conv_backprop() does not include a limit
> | check for the stack pointer (nc->sp), even though its value may
> | change after several recursive calls.
Rephrased as you suggested. The new commit message is the following:
| Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop().
|
| Thanks to Sergey Kaplun.
|
| (cherry picked from commit e45fd4cb713b610506213692f3b55a1869febb03)
|
| The function `narrow_conv_backprop()` does not include a limit check for
| the stack pointer (`nc->sp`), even though its value may change after
| several recursive calls. As a result, it leads to stack-buffer-overflow
| during the instruction narrowing. This patch adds the missing check.
|
| Sergey Kaplun:
| * added the description and the test for the problem
|
| Part of tarantool/tarantool#10199
>
> > it leads to stack-buffer-overflow during the instruction narrowing. This
> > patch adds a missing check.
> Typo: s/a missing/the missing
Fixed, thanks!
>
> >
> > Sergey Kaplun:
> > * added the description and the test for the problem
> >
> > Part of tarantool/tarantool#10199
> > ---
> >
> > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop
> > Related issues:
> > * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/10199
> > * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1262
>
> <snipped>
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-26 12:37 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-17 10:32 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-17 12:01 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-23 6:41 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-09-23 6:57 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2024-10-18 15:15 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvERUBfiTjptO_hQ@root \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop().' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox