From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop(). Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 09:57:20 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZvERUBfiTjptO_hQ@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <6xbb7bbda3bm7ryzzdovwq32wukphxi7aykr5wm3oxc3wsxxao@povjteevh5va> Hi, Maxim! Thanks for the review! Fixed your comments and force-pushed the branch. On 23.09.24, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote: > Hi, Sergey! > Thanks for the patch! > LGTM, except for a few nits below. > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 03:37:40PM GMT, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > > From: Mike Pall <mike> > > > > Thanks to Sergey Kaplun. > > > > (cherry picked from commit e45fd4cb713b610506213692f3b55a1869febb03) > > > > `narrow_conv_backprop()` misses the stack pointer (`nc->sp`) limit check > > after a bunch of recursive calls that may change its value. As a result, > It took me a minute to understand that sentence. Let's paraphrase it the > following way: > > | The function narrow_conv_backprop() does not include a limit > | check for the stack pointer (nc->sp), even though its value may > | change after several recursive calls. Rephrased as you suggested. The new commit message is the following: | Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop(). | | Thanks to Sergey Kaplun. | | (cherry picked from commit e45fd4cb713b610506213692f3b55a1869febb03) | | The function `narrow_conv_backprop()` does not include a limit check for | the stack pointer (`nc->sp`), even though its value may change after | several recursive calls. As a result, it leads to stack-buffer-overflow | during the instruction narrowing. This patch adds the missing check. | | Sergey Kaplun: | * added the description and the test for the problem | | Part of tarantool/tarantool#10199 > > > it leads to stack-buffer-overflow during the instruction narrowing. This > > patch adds a missing check. > Typo: s/a missing/the missing Fixed, thanks! > > > > > Sergey Kaplun: > > * added the description and the test for the problem > > > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#10199 > > --- > > > > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop > > Related issues: > > * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/10199 > > * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1262 > > <snipped> -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 6:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-08-26 12:37 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-09-17 10:32 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-09-17 12:01 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-09-23 6:41 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-09-23 6:57 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2024-10-18 15:15 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZvERUBfiTjptO_hQ@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop().' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox