From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] build: introduce LUAJIT_USE_UBSAN option Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:03:10 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZnP-Xu-HJncl2Q32@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <ccf8a42e-ad88-443a-94fb-39d546706eb0@tarantool.org> Hi, Sergey! Thanks for the reply! On 20.06.24, Sergey Bronnikov wrote: > Hi, Sergey, > > On 16.05.2024 13:14, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > > Hi, folks! > > Some more thoughts below. > > > > On 15.05.24, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > > > > <snipped> > > > >> + string(JOIN "," UBSAN_IGNORE_OPTIONS > >> + # Misaligned pseudo-pointers are used to determine internal > >> + # variable names inside the `for` cycle. > >> + alignment > >> + # Not interested in float cast overflow errors. > >> + float-cast-overflow > >> + # NULL checking is disabled because this is not a UB and > >> + # raises lots of false-positive fails. > >> + null > > Maybe it is worth to add also "nonnull-attribute" to the ignore options: > > > > ``` > > LSAN_OPTIONS="abort_on_error=1" src/luajit -e 'error("bad usage", 3)' > > /home/burii/builds_workspace/luajit/gh-8473-ubsan/src/lj_buf.h:75:25: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null > > /usr/include/string.h:44:28: note: nonnull attribute specified here > > ``` > > > > Here, `memcpy()` gets the NULL pointer as the first argument and the > > `len` == 0. So there are no problems here. Also, the nullability > > violation is not a UB, as mentioned in the documentation. > > > > Thoughts? > > I agree with arguments provided by Maxim - it's UB, the standard states > it clearly, > > and it should be fixed. I propose to do the following: > > - suppress the check (add it to UBSAN_IGNORE_OPTIONS) with appropriate > comment > > (something like "we know it is bad, but it is unfixed in upstream, we > will wait a fix"). > > Probably we should suppress it per file like you did with other checks. I suppress this particular failure inline, like for other checks. Should I add the test for it? > > - send a fix to upstream or submit an issue to the upstream (I'll not > insist, but it would be desirable) I suppose this issue will be marked as won't fix or invalid. Feel free to submit the ticket if you want. > > > <snipped> > >> + ) -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 10:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-05-15 12:31 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Add UBSan support Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-15 12:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] build: introduce LUAJIT_USE_UBSAN option Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-16 10:14 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-26 9:56 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-27 7:22 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-27 8:28 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-20 10:01 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-20 10:03 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2024-05-27 8:52 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-27 12:28 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-14 12:03 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-07 10:17 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-13 10:56 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-13 15:13 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-15 12:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] ci: enable UBSan for sanitizers testing workflow Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-26 9:50 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2024-05-27 12:30 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-07 10:20 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-13 10:35 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-06-13 15:06 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2024-07-09 8:06 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Add UBSan support Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZnP-Xu-HJncl2Q32@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] build: introduce LUAJIT_USE_UBSAN option' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox