From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Consider slots used by upvalues in use-def analysis.
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:48:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zc4WSWnCc1gDK4u9@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207145108.29786-1-skaplun@tarantool.org>
Sergey,
I've checked the patchset into all long-term branches in
tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, release/3.0 and
release/2.11.
On 07.02.24, Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>
> Reported by XmiliaH.
>
> (cherry picked from commit 3a654999c6f00de4cb9e61232d23579442e544a0)
>
> `snap_usedef()` analysis doesn't check slots for child upvalues of the
> currentlly recorded function in use-def analysis. Hence, such slots may
> be considered unused and not stored in the snapshot. So on snapshot
> restoration, values from these slots may be lost.
>
> This patch adds a marking for all such local upvalues.
>
> Sergey Kaplun:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
>
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#9595
> ---
>
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-737-snap-usedef-upvalues
> Tarantool PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/9662
> Related issues:
> * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9595
> * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/737
>
> src/lj_snap.c | 35 +++++++++++-
> .../lj-737-snap-use-def-upvalues.test.lua | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-737-snap-use-def-upvalues.test.lua
>
<snipped>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Best regards,
IM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-15 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 14:51 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08 11:11 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08 11:24 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08 12:49 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-09 16:54 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-15 13:48 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zc4WSWnCc1gDK4u9@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=imun@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Consider slots used by upvalues in use-def analysis.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox