Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Avoid out-of-range number of results when compiling select(k, ...).
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:47:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zc4V6mcshBN-ZZr2@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207120648.12416-1-skaplun@tarantool.org>

Sergey,

I've checked the patchset into all long-term branches in
tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, release/3.0 and
release/2.11.

On 07.02.24, Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
> 
> The interpreter will throw and abort the trace, anyway.
> 
> (cherry picked from commit 6ca580155b035fd369f193cdee59391b594a5028)
> 
> The `recff_select()` sets the amount of `RecordFFData` structure even
> for a negative first argument when trace is not recording (since the
> interpreter will throw an error anyway). This leads to excess IR
> emission and possible reads of dirty memory.
> 
> This patch updates the `rd->nres` only in the case when a trace will be
> recorded.
> 
> Sergey Kaplun:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
> 
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#9595
> ---
> 
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/fix-ff-select-recording
> Tarantool PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/9659
> Related issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9595
> 
>  src/lj_ffrecord.c                             |  2 +-
>  .../fix-ff-select-recording.test.lua          | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/fix-ff-select-recording.test.lua
> 

<snipped>

> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

-- 
Best regards,
IM

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-07 12:06 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08  9:30 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08  9:36   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08 13:05     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08 13:57 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-09 16:41 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-15 13:47 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zc4V6mcshBN-ZZr2@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=imun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Avoid out-of-range number of results when compiling select(k, ...).' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox