From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Cc: Maksim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2] Mark CONV as non-weak, to prevent elimination of its side-effect. Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:27:35 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZSPHh1WVVG3l_pWH@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <nf6lmn3q444l2a5nbxdszqrghbebaxes7gqb6wkhroos6xtnnd@hbt25ax5d2dw> Hi, Maxim! Thanks for the patch! LGTM, just a minor nit below. On 06.10.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote: <snipped> > > > +-- Before the patch, the `0022 > int CONV 0017 int.num` > > I see that IR "0022 > int CONV ..." is present in both IR traces... > Yep, they are omitted due to DCE and it happens on the trace assembly > stage. Dropped a comment. > > > +-- instruction is omitted due to DCE, which results in the > > > +-- third side exit being taken, instead of the second, > > > +-- and, hence, incorrect summation. After the patch, `CONV` > > > +-- is left intact and is not omitted; it remains as a guarded > > > +-- instruction, so the second side exit is taken and sum is > > > +-- performed correctly. > > > + > > > +for _, val in ipairs(data) do > > > + if val == val then > > > + sum = sum + val > > > + end > > > +end > Here is the diff with changes. Branch is force-pushed: > === > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/mark-conv-non-weak.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/mark-conv-non-weak.test.lua > index f54f30ba..b71be4da 100644 > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/mark-conv-non-weak.test.lua > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/mark-conv-non-weak.test.lua > @@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ local test = tap.test('mark-conv-non-weak'):skipcond({ > }) > > test:plan(1) > +-- XXX: These values were chosen to create type instability > +-- in the loop-carried dependency, so the checked `CONV int.num` > +-- instruction is emitted. See `loop_unrool` in `lj_opt_loop.c`. > +local data = {0, 0.1, 0, 0 / 0} > +local sum = 0.1 Do we really need to start the sum from 0.1, why just not 0? > > -local data = {0.1, 0, 0.1, 0, 0 / 0} > -local sum = 0 > - > -jit.opt.start('hotloop=2', 'hotexit=2') > +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1') > > -- XXX: The test fails before the patch only > -- for `DUALNUM` mode. All of the IRs below are > @@ -104,6 +106,9 @@ jit.opt.start('hotloop=2', 'hotexit=2') <snipped> -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 9:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-10-03 13:37 Maksim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-10-03 16:24 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches 2023-10-06 10:49 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-10-09 9:27 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2023-10-13 10:11 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-10-23 14:59 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-10-03 16:25 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZSPHh1WVVG3l_pWH@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2] Mark CONV as non-weak, to prevent elimination of its side-effect.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox