Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>
Cc: Sergey Bronnikov <estetus@gmail.com>,
	tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, max.kokryashkin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2][v2] Followup fix for embedded bytecode loader.
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 12:26:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZP7dVhnvZwG_kcDX@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed1c9205-0761-6713-9cd3-04c682111262@tarantool.org>

Hi, Sergey!
Thanks for the fixes and clarifications!
LGTM, after answering to my comments below.

On 07.09.23, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hi, Sergey
> 
> On 9/5/23 15:55, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > Hi, Sergey!
> > Thanks for the patch!
> > Please, consider my comments below.
> >
> > On 31.08.23, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> >> From: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>
> >>
> >> (cherry-picked from commit e49863eda13d095b1a78fd4ca0fd3a6a9a17d782)
> >>
> >> The patch follows up a previous patch and limits the total size of a
> >> chunk load by `lua_load` with size `LJ_MAX_BUF - 1`.
> >>
> >> Sergey Bronnikov:
> >> * added the description and the test
> >> ---

<snipped>

> >> diff --git a/test/tarantool-c-tests/lj-549-lua_load.test.c b/test/tarantool-c-tests/lj-549-lua_load.test.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 00000000..9baa7a1a
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/test/tarantool-c-tests/lj-549-lua_load.test.c

<snipped>

> >
> >> + 	 * `lex_more`.
> >> + 	 */
> >> + 	assert_true(res != LUA_ERRMEM);
> > Maybe it's better to use here codition res == LUA_OK?
> >
> >> + 	lua_settop(L, 0);
> >> +
> >> + 	return TEST_EXIT_SUCCESS;
> >> + }

<snipped>

> >> + static const char *
> >> + bc_reader_with_eof(lua_State *L, void *data, size_t *size)
> >> + {
> >> + 	UNUSED(L);
> >> + 	dt *test_data = (dt *)data;
> >> + 	if (test_data->state == EMIT_EOF) {
> >> + 		*size = 0;
> >> + 		return NULL;
> >> + 	}
> >> +
> >> + 	static char *bc_chunk = NULL;
> >> + 	free(bc_chunk);
> > This free is called only once, when bc_chunk is already NULL.
> > I suggest moving the initialization of the `bc_chunk` to the beginning
> > of the scope and calling `free()` only for the `EMIT_EOF` state (it's
> > also a little bit more readable -- a reader shouldn't remember that
> > `free(NULL)` is OK).
> Updated.

Unfortunately, I don't see these changes on branch [1].

> >
> >> +

<snipped>

> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Sergey Kaplun

[1]: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/blob/f7e5e8abe396411065f8941d04879577e7fae175/test/tarantool-c-tests/lj-549-lua-load.test.c#L70

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-11  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-31 11:29 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2][v2] Fix " Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-08-31 11:30 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2][v2] " Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-08-31 11:49   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-01  9:42   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-04  9:31     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-05  6:34       ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-05 14:10   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-07 15:21     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-11  8:45       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-12 10:20         ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-10-31 11:30           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-05 14:12   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-07  7:06     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-08-31 11:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2][v2] Followup fix for " Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-01 10:05   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-04 16:34     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-05  6:45       ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-05 12:55   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-07  7:04     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-11  9:26       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2023-09-12 10:30         ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZP7dVhnvZwG_kcDX@root \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=estetus@gmail.com \
    --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2][v2] Followup fix for embedded bytecode loader.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox