Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix use-def analysis for varargs
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:09:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKRSOk6qSF4ppIRH@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1686299850.git.skaplun@tarantool.org>

Sergey,

I've checked the patchset into all long-term branches in
tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, release/2.11 and
release/2.10.

On 09.06.23, Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> The first patch in the patchset fixes the problem related to the flaky
> test from tarantool/tarantool#8718. And a really similar issue is fixed
> via the second commit.
> 
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-704-bc-varg-use-def
> PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/8754
> Related Issues:
> * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/8516
> * https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/8718
> * https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/704
> 
> Mike Pall (2):
>   Fix use-def analysis for BC_VARG.
>   Fix use-def analysis for vararg functions.
> 
>  src/lj_snap.c                                 | 10 ++-
>  .../lj-704-bc-varg-use-def.test.lua           | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-704-bc-varg-use-def.test.lua
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Best regards,
IM

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-04 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-09  9:32 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-09  9:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Fix use-def analysis for BC_VARG Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-14 14:46   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-21  8:40     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-21  8:52       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-22  8:50         ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-28 10:19           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-28 18:44             ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-04 10:34   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-09  9:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] Fix use-def analysis for vararg functions Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-16  9:23   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-21  9:00     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-22  8:57       ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-04 11:41   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-04 17:09 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZKRSOk6qSF4ppIRH@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=imun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix use-def analysis for varargs' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox