Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Fix use-def analysis for BC_VARG.
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 13:19:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJwJKm9U4pO5bxoH@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1687423856.141170953@f477.i.mail.ru>

Hi, Maxim!
Thanks for the review!
Fixed your comment and force-pushed the branch.

On 22.06.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> Thanks for the fixes!
> LGTM, except for a single nit below.
>  
> > 

<snipped>

> >>> > >>+-- Test file to demonstrate LuaJIT misbehaviour in use-def
> >>> > >>+-- snapshot analysis for BC_VARG.
> >>> > >>+-- See also  https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/704 .
> >>> > >>+local test = tap.test('lj-704-bc-varg-use-def'):skipcond({
> >>> > >>+ ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
> >>> > >>+})
> >>> > >>+
> >>> > >>+test:plan(1)
> >>> > >>+
> >>> > >>+-- XXX: we don't really need to store this builtins, but this is
> >>> > >Typo: s/this/these/
> >>>
> >>> Fixed, thanks!
> >Typo: s/this is/this/

Fixed, thanks!

> >>>

<snipped>

> >--
> >Best regards,
> >Maxim Kokryashkin
> > 

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-09  9:32 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix use-def analysis for varargs Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-09  9:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Fix use-def analysis for BC_VARG Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-14 14:46   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-21  8:40     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-21  8:52       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-22  8:50         ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-28 10:19           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2023-06-28 18:44             ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-04 10:34   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-09  9:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] Fix use-def analysis for vararg functions Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-16  9:23   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-21  9:00     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-06-22  8:57       ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-04 11:41   ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-07-04 17:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix use-def analysis for varargs Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZJwJKm9U4pO5bxoH@root \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Fix use-def analysis for BC_VARG.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox