From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Maxim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] sysprof: move symtab update into profile hook Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 12:46:34 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZG3c+hemT3g6JIVr@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20230523152748.203212-1-m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Hi, Maxim! Thanks for the patch! Please, consider my comments below. On 23.05.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote: > Before the patch, the symtab update was done in the signal > handler. That update requires memory allocation, which > can't be done safely in a signal handler. This patch reuses > LuaJIT's HOOK_PROFILE for symtab update routine execution, so > it is now possible to update it safely after the signal > handler exit. > > Resolves tarantool/tarantool#8140 > --- > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash > Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/8140 > PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/8691 > > src/lj_dispatch.c | 10 ++++ > src/lj_sysprof.c | 34 +++++++++++++- > src/lj_sysprof.h | 4 ++ > test/tarantool-tests/CMakeLists.txt | 1 + > .../gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash.test.lua | 46 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../CMakeLists.txt | 9 ++++ > .../sysprofalloc.c | 17 +++++++ > 7 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash.test.lua > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/CMakeLists.txt > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/sysprofalloc.c > > diff --git a/src/lj_dispatch.c b/src/lj_dispatch.c > index ee735450..65948a0c 100644 > --- a/src/lj_dispatch.c > +++ b/src/lj_dispatch.c <snipped> > diff --git a/src/lj_sysprof.c b/src/lj_sysprof.c > index 2e9ed9b3..5b5cbe2a 100644 > --- a/src/lj_sysprof.c > +++ b/src/lj_sysprof.c > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct sysprof { > lj_profile_timer timer; /* Profiling timer. */ > int saved_errno; /* Saved errno when profiler failed. */ > uint32_t lib_adds; /* Number of libs loaded. Monotonic. */ > + volatile sig_atomic_t symtab_update_needed; /* Symtab update request flag. */ > }; > /* > ** XXX: Only one VM can be profiled at a time. > @@ -88,6 +89,36 @@ static struct sysprof sysprof = {0}; > static const uint8_t ljp_header[] = {'l', 'j', 'p', LJP_FORMAT_VERSION, > 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}; > > +void lj_symtab_update_hook(lua_State *L) { > + struct sysprof *sp = &sysprof; > + global_State *g = G(L); > + uint8_t mask; > + mask = (g->hookmask & ~HOOK_PROFILE); Nit: I suppose, that two lines above may be joined. > + sp->symtab_update_needed = 0; > + if (!(mask & HOOK_VMEVENT)) { Does it mean, that if we have signal inside VMEVENT we don't update our symtab table (since flag is reset) (*)? Should we move the line | sp->symtab_update_needed = 0; inside if condition? > + g->hookmask = HOOK_VMEVENT; > + lj_dispatch_update(g); > + lj_symtab_dump_newc(&sp->lib_adds, &sp->out, LJP_SYMTAB_CFUNC_EVENT, L); > + } > + g->hookmask = mask; > + lj_dispatch_update(g); > +} > + > +int lj_symtab_update_requested() { > + struct sysprof *sp = &sysprof; > + return sp->symtab_update_needed; > +} > + > +static void setup_symtab_update_hook(struct sysprof *sp) { > + global_State *g = sp->g; > + uint8_t mask = g->hookmask; > + if (!(mask & (HOOK_PROFILE|HOOK_VMEVENT|HOOK_GC))) { Why GC hook is mentioned here? > + sp->symtab_update_needed = 1; > + g->hookmask = (mask | HOOK_PROFILE); > + lj_dispatch_update(g); > + } The similar to (*) question here: If we have a signal inside VMEVENT, does this mean that there is no symbols to load for sure? If so, coment is highly desired. > +} > + > static int stream_is_needed(struct sysprof *sp) > { > return sp->opt.mode != LUAM_SYSPROF_DEFAULT; > @@ -240,8 +271,7 @@ static void stream_guest(struct sysprof *sp, uint32_t vmstate) <snipped> > diff --git a/src/lj_sysprof.h b/src/lj_sysprof.h > index 7e8c2e6e..456ca76f 100644 > --- a/src/lj_sysprof.h > +++ b/src/lj_sysprof.h > @@ -108,4 +108,8 @@ void lj_sysprof_add_proto(const struct GCproto *pt); <snipped> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/CMakeLists.txt b/test/tarantool-tests/CMakeLists.txt > index a428d009..25244733 100644 > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/CMakeLists.txt > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/CMakeLists.txt <snipped> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..afce83e2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ > +local tap = require('tap') > +local test = tap.test('gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash'):skipcond({ > + ["Sysprof is implemented for x86_64 only"] = jit.arch ~= "x86" and > + jit.arch ~= "x64", > + ["Sysprof is implemented for Linux only"] = jit.os ~= "Linux", > +}) I've reverted your changes and test still passes before the patch: | /home/burii/reviews/luajit/gh-8140-sysprof-in-alloc/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash.test.lua ............. ok | All tests successful. I've restored the sysprof.[ch] and dispatch changes, and leave tests as is. | gst | On branch fckxorg/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash | Your branch is behind 'origin/fckxorg/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash' by 1 commit, and can be fast-forwarded. | (use "git pull" to update your local branch) | | Changes to be committed: | (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage) | modified: test/tarantool-tests/CMakeLists.txt | new file: test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash.test.lua | new file: test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/CMakeLists.txt | new file: test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/sysprofalloc.c I've tried several times and test still passes. > +test:plan(2) > + > +local profilename = require("utils").profilename > +local profile = require('jit.profile') > + > +local TMP_BINFILE = profilename("sysprofdata.tmp.bin") > +local callback_called = false > + > +local function payload() > + local r = 0 > + for i = 1, 1e8 do > + r = r + i > + end > + return r > +end May be we should use more GC-specific payload? > + > +local function callback(_, _, _) > + callback_called = true > +end > + > +profile.start('f', callback) > +payload() > +profile.stop() > + > +test:ok(callback_called, 'LuaJIT profiler callback was not called.') Looks like it should be "was called"? > + > +jit.off() > +misc.sysprof.start{mode='C', interval=1, path=TMP_BINFILE} > +for _ = 1, 1e4 do > + require('sysprofalloc').get_string() Why do you try to require the module several times? Is it saved in `package.loaded` anyway? > + -- Make sure that C library is collected, so it will be loaded > + -- again on the next iteration. > + collectgarbage() > +end > +misc.sysprof.stop() > + > +test:ok(true, 'Sysprof has crashed.') Looks like it should be "has not crashed"? > + > +os.remove(TMP_BINFILE) > +os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1) > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/CMakeLists.txt b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/CMakeLists.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..dbe60219 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/CMakeLists.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ > +if (NOT(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME STREQUAL "Darwin")) > + BuildTestCLib(sysprofalloc sysprofalloc.c) > + # Unfortunately, <target_link_options> command is introduced > + # since CMake 3.13, so we can't use it now considering ancient > + # distros support. Just build linker flags by hands. > + set(CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS > + "${CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS} -Wl,--hash-style=both" Do we need both hashes here? > + ) > +endif() > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/sysprofalloc.c b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/sysprofalloc.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..d3c41d42 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/gh-8140-sysprof-allocator-crash/sysprofalloc.c > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ > +#include <lua.h> > +#include <lauxlib.h> > + > +int get_string(lua_State *L) { > + lua_pushstring(L, "test string"); > + return 1; Something strange with indentation: please, use tabs for __our__ C code in tests. > +} > + > +static const struct luaL_Reg sysprofalloc [] = { > + {"get_string", get_string}, > + {NULL, NULL} > +}; > + > +int luaopen_sysprofalloc(lua_State *L) { > + luaL_register(L, "sysprofalloc", sysprofalloc); > + return 1; > +} > -- > 2.40.1 > -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 9:50 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-05-23 15:27 Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-05-24 9:46 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZG3c+hemT3g6JIVr@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] sysprof: move symtab update into profile hook' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox