From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maksim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v8] Fix math.min()/math.max() inconsistencies.
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:37:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCXI1VZQ81YAvBJX@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230208200550.48291-1-max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>
Max,
I've checked the patchset into all long-term branches in
tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, 2.11 and 2.10.
On 08.02.23, Maksim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>
> (cherry-picked from commit 03208c8162af9cc01ca76ee1676ca79e5abe9b60)
>
> `math.min()`/`math.max()` could produce different results.
> Previously, dirty values on the Lua stack could be
> treated as arguments to `math.min()`/`math.max()`.
> This patch adds check for the number of arguments provided to
> math.min/max, which fixes the issue.
>
> Also, several fold optimizations were modified or
> deleted due to inconsistencies between compiler
> and interpreter on NaN-values.
>
> Changes in `fold_kfold_numarith()` also required
> to replace the `CC_LO/CC_HI` comparison modes with the `CC_LE/CC_PL`
> on aarch64 platforms. The issue is thoroughly described just before
> the corresponding test.
>
> Changes for MIPS and PPC architectures are ommited, due to the
> absence of other patches the are dependent on.
>
> Maxim Kokryashkin & Sergey Kaplun:
> * added the description and tests for the problem
>
> Resolves tarantool/tarantool#6163
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> - Fixed comments as per review by Sergey
>
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/gh-6163-min-max
> PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/7455
> Issue for x86 misbehavior: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/957
> src/lj_asm_arm.h | 6 +-
> src/lj_asm_arm64.h | 6 +-
> src/lj_opt_fold.c | 53 ++--
> src/lj_vmmath.c | 4 +-
> src/vm_arm.dasc | 4 +-
> src/vm_arm64.dasc | 4 +-
> src/vm_x64.dasc | 2 +-
> src/vm_x86.dasc | 2 +-
> test/tarantool-tests/gh-6163-min-max.test.lua | 263 ++++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/gh-6163-min-max.test.lua
>
<snipped>
> --
> 2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
>
--
Best regards,
IM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-08 20:05 Maksim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-03 12:28 ` sergos via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-06 14:52 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-06 14:57 ` sergos via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-30 17:37 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCXI1VZQ81YAvBJX@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=imun@tarantool.org \
--cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v8] Fix math.min()/math.max() inconsistencies.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox