From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Maxim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/5] test: disable `lj-603-snap-restore` test Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:25:04 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZBROEIuDGT1FIvZd@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <790098febd3a94337e892e4d7b1444ad1495b154.1678794695.git.m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Hi, Maxim! Thanks for the patch! Please, consider my comment below. On 14.03.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote: > The test is extremely fragile and it is burdening > to fix it in scope of every major change. > --- > test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua > index 6eb53dfd..2f2eec7d 100644 > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua > @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ local tap = require('tap') > -- Test to demonstrate the incorrect JIT behaviour when an error > -- is raised on restoration from the snapshot. > -- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/603. > -local test = tap.test('lj-603-err-snap-restore') > +local test = tap.test('lj-603-err-snap-restore'):skipcond({ > + ['Too fragile, temporarily disabled.'] = true > +}) I've reverted your patch at the last commit (4d5e9afe) and everything working just fine. I suggest to drop these changes. > > test:plan(2) > > -- > 2.39.0 > -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 11:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-03-14 12:01 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 0/5] jit: add exception unwinding Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/5] test: disable `lj-603-snap-restore` test Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-03-17 11:25 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2023-03-20 14:09 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 2/5] Handle on-trace OOM errors from helper functions Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 3/5] Disable unreliable assertion for external frame unwinding Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 4/5] OSX: " Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 5/5] Fix IR_RENAME snapshot number. Follow-up fix for a32aeadc Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZBROEIuDGT1FIvZd@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/5] test: disable `lj-603-snap-restore` test' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox