From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maxim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/5] test: disable `lj-603-snap-restore` test
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:25:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBROEIuDGT1FIvZd@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <790098febd3a94337e892e4d7b1444ad1495b154.1678794695.git.m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Hi, Maxim!
Thanks for the patch!
Please, consider my comment below.
On 14.03.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> The test is extremely fragile and it is burdening
> to fix it in scope of every major change.
> ---
> test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua
> index 6eb53dfd..2f2eec7d 100644
> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-603-err-snap-restore.test.lua
> @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ local tap = require('tap')
> -- Test to demonstrate the incorrect JIT behaviour when an error
> -- is raised on restoration from the snapshot.
> -- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/603.
> -local test = tap.test('lj-603-err-snap-restore')
> +local test = tap.test('lj-603-err-snap-restore'):skipcond({
> + ['Too fragile, temporarily disabled.'] = true
> +})
I've reverted your patch at the last commit (4d5e9afe) and everything
working just fine. I suggest to drop these changes.
>
> test:plan(2)
>
> --
> 2.39.0
>
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 12:01 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 0/5] jit: add exception unwinding Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/5] test: disable `lj-603-snap-restore` test Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-17 11:25 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2023-03-20 14:09 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 2/5] Handle on-trace OOM errors from helper functions Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 3/5] Disable unreliable assertion for external frame unwinding Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 4/5] OSX: " Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-03-14 12:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 5/5] Fix IR_RENAME snapshot number. Follow-up fix for a32aeadc Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZBROEIuDGT1FIvZd@root \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/5] test: disable `lj-603-snap-restore` test' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox