From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] ARM64: Fix assembly of HREFK.
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:11:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yr2S5oFWSssIB/Te@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211027130222.15625-1-skaplun@tarantool.org>
Sergey,
I've checked the patch into all long-term branches with ARM64 support in
tarantool/luajit and bumped a new version in master, 2.10.
On 27.10.21, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>
> Reported by Jason Teplitz.
>
> (cherry picked from commit 06cd9fce7df440323647174f1ca4a01281ec8acd)
>
> LDR instruction with register offset [1] has a restriction, that the
> destination register must be different from the register used for offset
> base. HREFK IR emits LDR instruction for a load of node key to a
> register. Base register to offset contains a node address. The register
> holding the node address is not excluded from a allow set, when loading
> the key value to a new register, and may be chosen by the register
> allocator as a destination for the key value, which violates the
> aforementioned restriction.
>
> This patch excludes the node register from the allowing set in the
> allocation of register for a key value.
>
> Sergey Kaplun:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
>
> [1]: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dui0489/c/arm-and-thumb-instructions/memory-access-instructions/ldr-and-str--register-offset-
>
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#6548
> ---
>
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-357-arm64-hrefk
> Tarantool branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/lj-357-arm64-hrefk
> LuaJIT issue: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/357
> Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/6548
>
> src/lj_asm_arm64.h | 11 ++++----
> .../lj-357-arm64-hrefk.test.lua | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-357-arm64-hrefk.test.lua
>
<snipped>
> --
> 2.31.0
>
--
Best regards,
IM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-30 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-27 13:02 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-03-30 10:26 ` sergos via Tarantool-patches
2022-04-04 8:55 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-06-29 9:16 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-06-30 12:11 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2025-06-12 9:36 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-25 14:20 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-25 14:41 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-26 9:47 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2025-07-25 9:19 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yr2S5oFWSssIB/Te@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=imun@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] ARM64: Fix assembly of HREFK.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox