Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Mikhail Shishatskiy <m.shishatskiy@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/3] memprof: add symbol epochs
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 10:56:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjBGwYOLcfxeMV3J@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202110329.664738-2-m.shishatskiy@tarantool.org>

Hi!

Thanks for the patch!
Please, sorry for such long response.
LGTM, except a few nits regarding the commit message.

Also, maybe we should add some tests to the patch?
Case for traces looks easy, doesn't it?

On 02.12.21, Mikhail Shishatskiy wrote:
> There may be situations, when new prototype or trace has the same
> address than the previously dumped one. In this case, the new symtab
> entry will shadow the preceeding, and if we demangle symbols when all

Typo: s/preceeding/preceding one/

> the events are parsed, we can get irrelevant information.
> 
> For this reason, the symtab now stores not a single entry, but array of

Typo: s/array/the array/

> entries for each location. The structure <loc> was extended by the field
> <epoch> representing the generation of symtab entry associated with this
> particular location entry. Also, the <utils/symtab.lua> API has extended
> by function symtab.new_loc(symbols, addr, line, traceno) so that it can
> assign an epoch for a new location.
> 
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#5815
> ---

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-15  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02 11:03 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 0/3] memprof: enrich symtab when meeting new prototype Mikhail Shishatskiy via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-02 11:03 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/3] memprof: add symbol epochs Mikhail Shishatskiy via Tarantool-patches
2022-03-15  7:56   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-12-02 11:03 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 2/3] memprof: enrich symtab when meeting new prototype Mikhail Shishatskiy via Tarantool-patches
2022-01-19 16:56   ` Mikhail Shishatskiy via Tarantool-patches
2022-01-25  8:14     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-12-02 11:03 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 3/3] memprof: substitute long proto names with aliases Mikhail Shishatskiy via Tarantool-patches
2022-01-25 10:12   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2022-04-12 14:30 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 0/3] memprof: enrich symtab when meeting new prototype Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YjBGwYOLcfxeMV3J@root \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=m.shishatskiy@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2 1/3] memprof: add symbol epochs' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox