From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>, Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v19 3/3] test: add gh-6036-qsync-order test Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:16:41 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YVtvOYqBT2PLE+dE@grain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <42713720-689c-221c-29a4-7087ccbc472f@tarantool.org> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:30:41PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote: > > Thanks for the test! > Please, find a couple of comments below. > I think the test won't be flaky anymore once you fix my comments. Thanks for comments, Serge! > > + > > +box.once("bootstrap", function() > > + box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'super') > > +end) > > Looks like "election_replica.lua" suits our needs perfectly now. > No need to introduce a new instance file. yup, I updated the test, thanks! > > +test_run:wait_cond(function() return box.space.test:get{1} ~= nil end) > > + | --- > > + | - true > > + | ... > > + > > > You may replace both calls with test_run:wait_lsn('master', 'replica') > Even without switching. Actually I need switch, otherwise i got stuck, so I use test_run:switch("master") box.ctl.promote() s = box.schema.create_space('test', {is_sync = true}) _ = s:create_index('pk') s:insert{1} test_run:switch("replica1") test_run:wait_lsn('replica1', 'master') test_run:switch("replica2") test_run:wait_lsn('replica2', 'master') which works just fine > > + > > +-- > > +-- Make replica1 been a leader and start writting data, > > +-- the PROMOTE request get queued on replica2 and not > > +-- yet processed, same time INSERT won't complete either > > +-- waiting for PROMOTE completion first. > > +test_run:switch("replica1") > > + | --- > > + | - true > > + | ... > > +box.ctl.promote() > > + | --- > > + | ... > > +_ = require('fiber').create(function() box.space.test:insert{2} end) > > + | --- > > + | ... > > + > > +-- > > Prior to doing something on master, you should make sure > replica2 has received the promote. > "wait_lsn" won't work here, because WAL is disabled. You may try > test_run:wait_cond(function() return box.space.test:get{2} ~= nil end) Wait, this moment is dubious. Look, once we issue promote it get stuck inside journal write procedure so the next "insert" won't proceed until the promote finished. I understand that you point to the potential race here because even promote() command may get finished but slowed down on nework level and simply reach replica2 out of other calls. I think without aditional debug output (such as promote term exposed via box.info I did in previous series) we can't be sure about timings and it seems that i've to return back the box.info patch. I mean currently the command test_run:wait_cond(function() return box.space.test:get{2} ~= nil end) stucks forever because promote yet not finished and next 'insert' simply has not been applied.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-04 21:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-09-30 9:44 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v19 0/3] qsync: implement packet filtering (part 1) Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-09-30 9:44 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v19 1/3] latch: add latch_is_locked helper Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-09-30 9:44 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v19 2/3] qsync: order access to the limbo terms Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-01 12:14 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-01 12:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-01 12:37 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-04 21:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-05 13:25 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-05 21:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-09-30 9:44 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v19 3/3] test: add gh-6036-qsync-order test Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-01 12:30 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-04 21:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-10-05 13:55 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-05 22:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-05 22:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-10-06 7:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YVtvOYqBT2PLE+dE@grain \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v19 3/3] test: add gh-6036-qsync-order test' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox