From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>,
Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 3/5] limbo: gather promote tracking into a separate structure
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:20:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPAoHt7ygxzpIXSD@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3b5a447-a3bb-46d0-3dcc-0c4451a8cdd2@tarantool.org>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 03:00:11PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
>
>
> 15.07.2021 14:46, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 02:28:46PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> > > > +static void
> > > > +txn_limbo_promote_create(struct txn_limbo_promote *pmt)
> > > > +{
> > > > + vclock_create(&pmt->terms_map);
> > > > + pmt->terms_max = 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > I don't like the name (limbo->promote, struct txn_limbo_promote),
> > > but can't come up with a better one.
> > >
> > > The structure doesn't hold a specific promote. It's more like "promote
> > > history", or "terms seen".
> > >
> > > Maybe something like "term history" ? "term tracker" ?
> > > "remote term set", "term set" ?
> > >
> > > Just a suggestion, my names are not too good.
> > Sure! How about
> >
> > struct txn_terms {
> > latch lock;
> > vclock_t map;
> > uint64_t map_max;
> > };
>
> Maybe txn_limbo_terms then?
> txn_terms sounds like something related to transactions,
> but transactions know nothing of terms.
Sounds OK! Will rename.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-15 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-14 21:23 [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 0/5] limbo: implement packets filtering Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 1/5] latch: add latch_is_locked helper Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:15 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 2/5] say: introduce panic_on helper Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 3/5] limbo: gather promote tracking into a separate structure Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:28 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 12:00 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 12:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 4/5] limbo: order access to the promote terms Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:48 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 12:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-14 21:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 5/5] limbo: filter incoming requests Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-07-15 11:59 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPAoHt7ygxzpIXSD@grain \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC v5 3/5] limbo: gather promote tracking into a separate structure' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox